A Hybrid AI and Rule-Based Decision Support System for Disease Diagnosis and Management Using Labs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14876v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 06:22:48 GMT
• Title: A Hybrid AI and Rule-Based Decision Support System for Disease Diagnosis and Management Using Labs
• Abstract summary: The system fuses knowledge contained in a rule-base expert system with inferences of data driven predictors based on the features in labs.<n>Our Rule-Base comprises clinically validated rules, modeling 59 health conditions that can directly confirm one or more of diseases and assign ICD-10 codes to them.<n>The Likely Diagnosis system uses multi-class classification, covering 37 ICD-10 codes, which are grouped together into 11 categories based on the labs that physicians prescribe to confirm the diagnosis.
• Score: 0.8264316322451414
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This research paper outlines the development and implementation of a novel Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) that integrates AI predictive modeling with medical knowledge bases. It utilizes the quantifiable information elements in lab results for inferring likely diagnoses a patient might have. Subsequently, suggesting investigations to confirm the likely diagnoses -- an assistive tool for physicians. The system fuses knowledge contained in a rule-base expert system with inferences of data driven predictors based on the features in labs. The data for 593,055 patients was collected from 547 primary care centers across the US to model our decision support system and derive Real-Word Evidence (RWE) to make it relevant for a large demographic of patients. Our Rule-Base comprises clinically validated rules, modeling 59 health conditions that can directly confirm one or more of diseases and assign ICD-10 codes to them. The Likely Diagnosis system uses multi-class classification, covering 37 ICD-10 codes, which are grouped together into 11 categories based on the labs that physicians prescribe to confirm the diagnosis. This research offers a novel system that assists a physician by utilizing medical profile of a patient and routine lab investigations to predict a group of likely diseases and then confirm them, coupled with providing explanations for inferences, thereby assisting physicians to reduce misdiagnosis of patients in clinical decision-making.

Related papers

• MedReaMM: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Expert-Level Clinical Diagnostic Synthesis [61.266743965495884]
  We introduce MedReaMM, a benchmark designed to evaluate models' ability to synthesize heterogeneous clinical evidence.<n>MedReaMM comprises 625 expert-validated cases with an average of 2.79 medical images per case and a total of 1,042 standardized diagnoses annotated with ICD-11 codes.<n>We evaluate 23 Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) and find that most achieve diagnostic accuracy scores below 50%, underscoring a substantial gap in multimodal diagnostic synthesis capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-23T09:37:53Z)
• Medical Model Synthesis Architectures: A Case Study [72.46211022258122]
  Current AI systems struggle with calibrated reasoning under uncertainty.<n>We propose a framework for AI systems that can make practically useful but formally transparent clinical predictions under uncertainty.<n>We show how an initial proof-of-concept of this framework can be used for differential diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T19:30:16Z)
• Doctorina MedBench: End-to-End Evaluation of Agent-Based Medical AI [0.0]
  Doctorina MedBench is a comprehensive evaluation framework for agent-based medical AI based on the simulation of realistic physician-patient interactions.<n>The framework supports safety-oriented trap cases, category-based random sampling of clinical scenarios, and full regression testing.<n>The universality of the evaluation metrics allows the framework to be used not only to assess medical AI systems, but also to evaluate physicians and support the development of clinical reasoning skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T18:38:25Z)
• Evolving Diagnostic Agents in a Virtual Clinical Environment [75.59389103511559]
  We present a framework for training large language models (LLMs) as diagnostic agents with reinforcement learning.<n>Our method acquires diagnostic strategies through interactive exploration and outcome-based feedback.<n>DiagAgent significantly outperforms 10 state-of-the-art LLMs, including DeepSeek-v3 and GPT-4o.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T17:19:47Z)
• Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
  We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z)
• End-to-End Agentic RAG System Training for Traceable Diagnostic Reasoning [52.12425911708585]
  Deep-DxSearch is an agentic RAG system trained end-to-end with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>In Deep-DxSearch, we first construct a large-scale medical retrieval corpus comprising patient records and reliable medical knowledge sources.<n> Experiments demonstrate that our end-to-end RL training framework consistently outperforms prompt-engineering and training-free RAG approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T17:42:47Z)
• An Agentic System for Rare Disease Diagnosis with Traceable Reasoning [69.46279475491164]
  We introduce DeepRare, the first rare disease diagnosis agentic system powered by a large language model (LLM)<n>DeepRare generates ranked diagnostic hypotheses for rare diseases, each accompanied by a transparent chain of reasoning.<n>The system demonstrates exceptional diagnostic performance among 2,919 diseases, achieving 100% accuracy for 1013 diseases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T13:42:26Z)
• Bridging Stepwise Lab-Informed Pretraining and Knowledge-Guided Learning for Diagnostic Reasoning [20.369746122143063]
  We propose a dual-expertise framework that combines two complementary sources of information.<n>For external knowledge, we construct a Diagnosis Knowledge Graph (KG) that encodes both hierarchical language and semantic relations enriched by large models.<n>We introduce a lab-informed proxy task that guides the model to follow a clinically consistent stepwise reasoning process based on lab test signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T20:25:22Z)
• Conversational Disease Diagnosis via External Planner-Controlled Large Language Models [18.93345199841588]
  This study presents a LLM-based diagnostic system that enhances planning capabilities by emulating doctors. By utilizing real patient electronic medical record data, we constructed simulated dialogues between virtual patients and doctors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T06:16:35Z)
• Towards the Identifiability and Explainability for Personalized Learner Modeling: An Inductive Paradigm [36.60917255464867]
  We propose an identifiable cognitive diagnosis framework (ID-CDF) based on a novel response-proficiency-response paradigm inspired by encoder-decoder models. We show that ID-CDF can effectively address the problems without loss of diagnosis preciseness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T07:18:02Z)
• Clinical Evidence Engine: Proof-of-Concept For A Clinical-Domain-Agnostic Decision Support Infrastructure [26.565616653685115]
  We present a proof-of-concept system to demonstrate the technical and design feasibility of this approach across three domains. Leveraging Clinical BioBERT, the system can effectively identify clinical trial reports based on lengthy clinical questions. We discuss the idea of designing DST explanations not as specific to a DST or an algorithm, but as a domain-agnostic decision support infrastructure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-31T23:21:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.