Mechanistic Foundations of Goal-Directed Control

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15248v2
• Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 21:36:46 GMT
• Title: Mechanistic Foundations of Goal-Directed Control
• Abstract summary: We show that foundational biases give rise to causal control circuits, with learned gating mechanisms converging toward theoretically motivated uncertainty thresholds.<n>This work sharpens mechanistic accounts of cognitive development and provides principled guidance for the design of interpretable embodied agents.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Mechanistic interpretability has transformed the analysis of transformer circuits by decomposing model behavior into competing algorithms, identifying phase transitions during training, and deriving closed-form predictions for when and why strategies shift. However, this program has remained largely confined to sequence-prediction architectures, leaving embodied control systems without comparable mechanistic accounts. Here we extend this framework to sensorimotor-cognitive development, using infant motor learning as a model system. We show that foundational inductive biases give rise to causal control circuits, with learned gating mechanisms converging toward theoretically motivated uncertainty thresholds. The resulting dynamics reveal a clean phase transition in the arbitration gate whose commitment behavior is well described by a closed-form exponential moving-average surrogate. We identify context window k as the critical parameter governing circuit formation: below a minimum threshold (k$\leq$4) the arbitration mechanism cannot form; above it (k$\geq$8), gate confidence scales asymptotically as log k. A two-dimensional phase diagram further reveals task-demand-dependent route arbitration consistent with the prediction that prospective execution becomes advantageous only when prediction error remains within the task tolerance window. Together, these results provide a mechanistic account of how reactive and prospective control strategies emerge and compete during learning. More broadly, this work sharpens mechanistic accounts of cognitive development and provides principled guidance for the design of interpretable embodied agents.

Related papers

• Indirect Geoeconomic Influence: A Switching Dynamical Systems Framework for Mechanism Design [0.8399688944263844]
  We develop a formal framework for analyzing indirect geoeconomic influence.<n>We analyze two modes: a permissive mode, in which a mechanism transmits pressure toward the sender's preferred policy, and a contested mode, entered naturally once the target detects and attributes the mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T06:01:11Z)
• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• Active Inference: A method for Phenotyping Agency in AI systems? [0.11904398364437437]
  We argue for a minimal notion open to principled inspection given three criteria.<n> posterior beliefs, prior preferences, and the minimization of expected free energy jointly constitute an agentic action chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-25T12:41:53Z)
• Decoding the Critique Mechanism in Large Reasoning Models [50.821607345799386]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) exhibit backtracking and self-verification mechanisms that enable them to revise intermediate steps and reach correct solutions.<n>We investigate how current LRMs recover from errors by inserting arithmetic mistakes in their intermediate reasoning steps.<n>We find that despite the error propagating through the chain-of-thought, the model still reaches the correct final answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T10:03:30Z)
• OrthoFormer: Instrumental Variable Estimation in Transformer Hidden States via Neural Control Functions [0.0]
  Transformer architectures excel at sequential modeling yet remain fundamentally limited by correlational learning.<n>We propose OrthoFormer, a causally grounded architecture that embeds instrumental variable estimation directly into Transformer blocks via neural control functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-08T03:05:16Z)
• Epistemic Traps: Rational Misalignment Driven by Model Misspecification [36.837352790122544]
  We show that safety is a discrete phase determined by the agent's priors rather than a continuous function of reward magnitude.<n>This establishes Subjective Model Engineering as a necessary condition for robust alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T09:21:36Z)
• From Passive Metric to Active Signal: The Evolving Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models [77.04403907729738]
  This survey charts the evolution of uncertainty from a passive diagnostic metric to an active control signal guiding real-time model behavior.<n>We demonstrate how uncertainty is leveraged as an active control signal across three frontiers.<n>This survey argues that mastering the new trend of uncertainty is essential for building the next generation of scalable, reliable, and trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T06:21:31Z)
• Closed-Loop Transformers: Autoregressive Modeling as Iterative Latent Equilibrium [0.6820746164515952]
  We introduce the closed-loop prediction principle, which requires that models iteratively refine latent representations until reaching a self-consistent equilibrium.<n>We instantiate this principle as Equilibrium Transformers, which augment standard transformer layers with an Equilibrium Refinement Module.<n>Preliminary experiments on the binary parity task demonstrate +3.28% average improvement on challenging sequences, with gains reaching +8.07% where standard transformers approach random performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T20:02:59Z)
• Drift No More? Context Equilibria in Multi-Turn LLM Interactions [58.69551510148673]
  contexts drift is the gradual divergence of a model's outputs from goal-consistent behavior across turns.<n>Unlike single-turn errors, drift unfolds temporally and is poorly captured by static evaluation metrics.<n>We show that multi-turn drift can be understood as a controllable equilibrium phenomenon rather than as inevitable decay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T04:48:49Z)
• Disentangling Recall and Reasoning in Transformer Models through Layer-wise Attention and Activation Analysis [3.1526281887627587]
  Distinguishing recall from reasoning is crucial for predicting model generalization.<n>We use controlled datasets of synthetic linguistic puzzles to probe transformer models at the layer, head, and neuron level.<n>Our results provide the first causal evidence that recall and reasoning rely on separable but interacting circuits in transformer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T04:13:06Z)
• Interpreting Affine Recurrence Learning in GPT-style Transformers [54.01174470722201]
  In-context learning allows GPT-style transformers to generalize during inference without modifying their weights. This paper focuses specifically on their ability to learn and predict affine recurrences as an ICL task. We analyze the model's internal operations using both empirical and theoretical approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T21:30:01Z)
• Interpretable Imitation Learning with Dynamic Causal Relations [65.18456572421702]
  We propose to expose captured knowledge in the form of a directed acyclic causal graph. We also design this causal discovery process to be state-dependent, enabling it to model the dynamics in latent causal graphs. The proposed framework is composed of three parts: a dynamic causal discovery module, a causality encoding module, and a prediction module, and is trained in an end-to-end manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T20:59:42Z)
• Provable Guarantees for Generative Behavior Cloning: Bridging Low-Level Stability and High-Level Behavior [51.60683890503293]
  We propose a theoretical framework for studying behavior cloning of complex expert demonstrations using generative modeling. We show that pure supervised cloning can generate trajectories matching the per-time step distribution of arbitrary expert trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T04:27:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.