SoK: Systematizing Software Artifacts Traceability via Associations, Techniques, and Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16208v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 07:39:31 GMT
• Title: SoK: Systematizing Software Artifacts Traceability via Associations, Techniques, and Applications
• Abstract summary: This review contributes a coherent knowledge framework for artifacts traceability research.<n>We constructed the first global artifacts traceability graph of 23 associations among 22 artifact types.<n>We proposed a role-centric framework to dynamically align artifact paths with concrete engineering activities.
• Score: 12.18666544469496
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Software development relies heavily on traceability links between various software artifacts to ensure quality and facilitate maintenance. While automated traceability recovery techniques have advanced for different artifact pairs, the field remains fragmented with an incomplete overview of artifact associations, ambiguous linking techniques, and fragmented knowledge of application scenarios. To bridge these gaps, we conducted a systematic literature review on software traceability recovery to synthesize the linked artifacts, recovery tools, and usage scenarios across the traceability ecosystem. First, we constructed the first global artifacts traceability graph of 23 associations among 22 artifact types, exposing a severe research imbalance that heavily favors code-related links. Second, while recovery techniques are shifting toward deep semantic models, a reproducibility crisis persists (e.g., only 37% of studies released code); to address this, we provided a comprehensive evaluation framework including a technical decision map and standardized benchmarks. Finally, we quantified an industrial adoption gap (i.e., 95% of tools remain confined to academia) and proposed a role-centric framework to dynamically align artifact paths with concrete engineering activities. This review contributes a coherent knowledge framework for artifacts traceability research, identifies current trends, and provides directions for future work.

Related papers

• Recovering Software Architecture Intent from Historical Work Items using Generative AI: A Mixed-Methods Industry Case Study [2.5501791028999583]
  This work investigates the recovery of C4 architecture diagrams from historical agile work items using an LLM-based pipeline.<n>The semi-automatic five-step workflow employs a prompt chain, bidirectional traceability, and Chain-of-Thought reasoning.<n>The proposed workflow demonstrates the practical viability of LLM-assisted architectural recovery based on development process artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-28T14:56:00Z)
• ArtifactLinker: Linking Scientific Artifacts for Automatic State-of-the-Art Discovery [58.48859167777581]
  ArtifactLinker is a framework to automatically discover state-of-the-art (SOTA) models for datasets.<n>A benchmark named ArtifactBench with 14,053 artifacts and 51,337 relations is presented.<n>Results show that (1) graph structures between existing artifacts are effective for missing link prediction; (2) end-to-end ranking and verification with ArtifactLinker help discover potential SOTA results and research insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-16T09:26:08Z)
• Understanding by Reconstruction: Reversing the Software Development Process for LLM Pretraining [66.89012795621349]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with the deep, long-horizon reasoning required for complex software engineering.<n>We propose a novel paradigm: understanding via reconstruction.<n>We introduce a framework that synthesizes latent agentic trajectories using a multi-agent simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T09:23:20Z)
• Advances and Frontiers of LLM-based Issue Resolution in Software Engineering: A Comprehensive Survey [59.3507264893654]
  Issue resolution is a complex Software Engineering task integral to real-world development.<n> benchmarks like SWE-bench revealed this task as profoundly difficult for large language models.<n>This paper presents a systematic survey of this emerging domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T18:55:03Z)
• Executable Knowledge Graphs for Replicating AI Research [65.41207324831583]
  Executable Knowledge Graphs (xKG) is a modular and pluggable knowledge base that automatically integrates technical insights, code snippets, and domain-specific knowledge extracted from scientific literature.<n>Code will released at https://github.com/zjunlp/xKG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T17:53:23Z)
• A Systematic Literature Review on Detecting Software Vulnerabilities with Large Language Models [2.518519330408713]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in software engineering have sparked interest in their use for software vulnerability detection.<n>The rapid development of this field has resulted in a fragmented research landscape.<n>This fragmentation makes it difficult to obtain a clear overview of the state-of-the-art or compare and categorize studies meaningfully.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T13:17:16Z)
• TRIAD: Automated Traceability Recovery based on Biterm-enhanced Deduction of Transitive Links among Artifacts [53.92293118080274]
  Traceability allows stakeholders to extract and comprehend the trace links among software artifacts introduced across the software life cycle. Most rely on textual similarities among software artifacts, such as those based on Information Retrieval (IR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T06:44:24Z)
• A Discrepancy Aware Framework for Robust Anomaly Detection [51.710249807397695]
  We present a Discrepancy Aware Framework (DAF), which demonstrates robust performance consistently with simple and cheap strategies. Our method leverages an appearance-agnostic cue to guide the decoder in identifying defects, thereby alleviating its reliance on synthetic appearance. Under the simple synthesis strategies, it outperforms existing methods by a large margin. Furthermore, it also achieves the state-of-the-art localization performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T15:21:40Z)
• Improving Trace Link Recommendation by Using Non-Isotropic Distances and Combinations [0.799536002595393]
  We study non-linear similarity measures for computing trace links. We evaluated our observations on a dataset of four open source projects and two industrial projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T11:35:02Z)
• An Empirical Study on Data Leakage and Generalizability of Link Prediction Models for Issues and Commits [7.061740334417124]
  LinkFormer preserves and improves the accuracy of existing predictions. Our findings support that to simulate real-world scenarios effectively, researchers must maintain the temporal flow of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T10:54:26Z)
• Improving the Effectiveness of Traceability Link Recovery using Hierarchical Bayesian Networks [21.15456830607455]
  We implement a HierarchiCal PrObabilistic Model for SoftwarE Traceability (Comet) Comet is capable of modeling relationships between artifacts by combining the complementary observational prowess of multiple measures of textual similarity. We conduct a comprehensive empirical evaluation of Comet that illustrates an improvement over a set of optimally configured baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T19:38:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.