LLM Use, Cheating, and Academic Integrity in Software Engineering Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17060v2
• Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 02:03:40 GMT
• Title: LLM Use, Cheating, and Academic Integrity in Software Engineering Education
• Abstract summary: Cheating in university education is commonly described as context dependent and influenced by assessment design, institutional norms, and student interpretation.<n>This study investigates how software engineering students describe experiences of using large language models (LLMs) in ways they perceived as inappropriate, disallowed, or misaligned with course expectations.
• Score: 2.6055991635575446
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Background: Cheating in university education is commonly described as context dependent and influenced by assessment design, institutional norms, and student interpretation. In software engineering education, programming oriented coursework has historically involved ambiguity around collaboration, reuse, and external assistance. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have introduced additional mediation in the production of code and related artifacts. Aims: This study investigates how software engineering students describe experiences of using LLMs in ways they perceived as inappropriate, disallowed, or misaligned with course expectations. Method: A cross sectional survey was conducted with 116 undergraduate software engineering students from multiple countries, combining quantitative summaries with qualitative data. Results: Reported LLM cheating practices occurred primarily in programming assignments, routine coursework, and documentation tasks, often in contexts of time pressure and unclear guidance. Use during quizzes and exams was less frequent and more consistently identified as a violation. Students reported awareness of academic and professional consequences regarding LLM cheating, while formal sanctions were perceived as limited. Conclusions: Our study indicates that reported LLM misuse in software engineering is associated with assessment and instructional conditions, suggesting a need for clearer alignment between assessment design, learning objectives, and expectations for LLM use.

Related papers

• ClarifyCodeBench: Evaluating LLMs on Clarifying Ambiguous Requirements for Code Generation [54.788849448970154]
  We introduce ClarifyCodeBench, a novel interactive benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' capability in resolving requirement ambiguity.<n>We conduct a systematic evaluation of six state-of-the-art LLMs using ClarifyCodeBench.<n>Our empirical results yield three critical insights: 1) Capability Decoupling: Strong code generation performance does not inherently translate to effective requirement clarification; 2) The Reasoning Paradox: While increased computational thinking enhances code correctness, it yields marginal gains in identifying ambiguities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T09:58:59Z)
• How Software Engineering Students Use LLMs to Write Research Papers: An Experience Report [3.415373522515852]
  Large language models are increasingly becoming part of software engineering education.<n>This paper reports an educational experience involving the integration of reflective LLM use into an empirical methods assignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T17:19:43Z)
• Towards Personalizing Secure Programming Education with LLM-Injected Vulnerabilities [5.120675183010351]
  According to constructivist theory, students learn software security more effectively when examples are grounded in their own code.<n>This paper introduces a method that uses LLMs to inject instances of specific Common Weaknessions into students' own assignment code.<n>We present an agentic AI framework, using autonomous-based agents equipped with task-specific tools to orchestrate injection, evaluation, ranking, and learning outcome generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T15:06:42Z)
• Once Upon a Team: Investigating Bias in LLM-Driven Software Team Composition and Task Allocation [48.2168236140771]
  This study investigates whether LLMs exhibit bias in team composition and task assignment.<n>Using three LLMs and 3,000 simulated decisions, we find systematic disparities.<n>Our findings indicate that LLMs exacerbate demographic inequities in software engineering contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T12:13:22Z)
• Do AI models help produce verified bug fixes? [62.985237003585674]
  Large Language Models are used to produce corrections to software bugs.<n>This paper investigates how programmers use Large Language Models to complement their own skills.<n>The results are a first step towards a proper role for AI and LLMs in providing guaranteed-correct fixes to program bugs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T17:30:16Z)
• Can Large Language Models Help Students Prove Software Correctness? An Experimental Study with Dafny [75.55915044740566]
  Students in computing education increasingly use large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT.<n>This paper investigates how students interact with an LLM when solving formal verification exercises in Dafny.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T16:34:13Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models for Real-World Engineering Tasks [75.97299249823972]
  This paper introduces a curated database comprising over 100 questions derived from authentic, production-oriented engineering scenarios.<n>Using this dataset, we evaluate four state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our results show that LLMs demonstrate strengths in basic temporal and structural reasoning but struggle significantly with abstract reasoning, formal modeling, and context-sensitive engineering logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T14:05:23Z)
• LLMs' Reshaping of People, Processes, Products, and Society in Software Development: A Comprehensive Exploration with Early Adopters [3.4069804433026314]
  Large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and GitHub Copilot are rapidly gaining traction in the software industry.<n>Our study provides a nuanced understanding of how LLMs are shaping the landscape of software development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T22:27:05Z)
• Insights from Social Shaping Theory: The Appropriation of Large Language Models in an Undergraduate Programming Course [0.9718746651638346]
  Large language models (LLMs) can generate, debug, and explain code. Our study explores how students' social perceptions influence their own LLM usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T16:40:14Z)
• Analyzing LLM Usage in an Advanced Computing Class in India [4.580708389528142]
  This study examines the use of large language models (LLMs) by undergraduate and graduate students for programming assignments in advanced computing classes. We conducted a comprehensive analysis involving 411 students from a Distributed Systems class at an Indian university.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T12:06:56Z)
• An Exploratory Study on Upper-Level Computing Students' Use of Large Language Models as Tools in a Semester-Long Project [2.7325338323814328]
  The purpose of this study is to explore computing students' experiences and approaches to using LLMs during a semester-long software engineering project. We collected data from a senior-level software engineering course at Purdue University. We analyzed the data to identify themes related to students' usage patterns and learning outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T15:21:58Z)
• CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing [139.77117915309023]
  CRITIC allows large language models to validate and amend their own outputs in a manner similar to human interaction with tools. Comprehensive evaluations involving free-form question answering, mathematical program synthesis, and toxicity reduction demonstrate that CRITIC consistently enhances the performance of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T15:19:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.