Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17123v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 20:32:06 GMT
• Title: Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models increasingly power critical infrastructure from healthcare to finance, yet their vulnerability to adversarial manipulation threatens system integrity and user safety.<n>This research addresses this gap by establishing a standardized vulnerability assessment framework and developing a multi-layered defensive system to protect against identified threats.
• Score: 0.6015898117103067
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models increasingly power critical infrastructure from healthcare to finance, yet their vulnerability to adversarial manipulation threatens system integrity and user safety. Despite growing deployment, no comprehensive comparative security assessment exists across major LLM architectures, leaving organizations unable to quantify risk or select appropriately secure LLMs for sensitive applications. This research addresses this gap by establishing a standardized vulnerability assessment framework and developing a multi-layered defensive system to protect against identified threats. We systematically evaluate five widely-deployed LLM families GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo, Claude-3 Haiku, LLaMA-2-70B, and Gemini-2.5-pro against 10,000 adversarial prompts spanning six attack categories. Our assessment reveals critical security disparities, with vulnerability rates ranging from 11.9\% to 29.8\%, demonstrating that LLM capability does not correlate with security robustness. To mitigate these risks, we develop a production-ready defensive framework achieving 83\% average detection accuracy with only 5\% false positives. These results demonstrate that systematic security assessment combined with external defensive measures provides a viable path toward safer LLM deployment in production environments.

Related papers

• Yuvion LLM: An Adversarially-Aware Large Language Model for Content And AI Safety [67.86055044301408]
  We present Yuvion LLM, a large language model built for adversarially robust content safety and broader AI safety.<n>Its pipeline combines adversarially aware data construction, knowledge-enhanced continued pretraining, and policy-grounded multi-task safety post-training.<n>Yuvion LLM demonstrates clear advantages on safety-focused benchmarks and particularly strong robustness under adversarial conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-26T01:12:02Z)
• Steering LLM Viewpoints through Fabricated Evidence Injection [61.22850755490993]
  We introduce a two-phase attack framework that first repackages misleading statements with fabricated rationales, then instruct target LLMs to incorporate these viewpoints when responding to relevant queries.<n>Experiments on BBQ, ToxiGen, and our specialized dataset reveal that commercial LLMs without external safety classifiers remain highly vulnerable.<n>Building on this, we explore multiple defense strategies, among which a tailored safety policy enablesgpt-oss-safeguard to achieve 81% detection rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T14:48:23Z)
• What Matters For Safety Alignment? [38.86339753409445]
  This paper presents a comprehensive empirical study on the safety alignment capabilities of AI systems.<n>We systematically investigate and compare the influence of six critical intrinsic model characteristics and three external attack techniques.<n>We identify the LRMs GPT-OSS-20B, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking, and GPT-OSS-120B as the top-three safest models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T12:31:52Z)
• SafeLawBench: Towards Safe Alignment of Large Language Models [18.035407356604832]
  There is a lack of definitive standards for evaluating the safety of large language models (LLMs)<n>SafeLawBench categorizes safety risks into three levels based on legal standards.<n>It comprises 24,860 multi-choice questions and 1,106 open-domain question-answering (QA) tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T03:09:59Z)
• Analysing Safety Risks in LLMs Fine-Tuned with Pseudo-Malicious Cyber Security Data [2.549390156222399]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been used in many application domains, including cyber security.<n>Recent findings show that fine-tuning LLMs with pseudo-malicious cyber security data significantly compromises their safety.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive validation and extension of these safety risks using a different evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T05:22:53Z)
• Can Small Language Models Reliably Resist Jailbreak Attacks? A Comprehensive Evaluation [10.987263424166477]
  Small language models (SLMs) have emerged as promising alternatives to large language models (LLMs)<n>In this paper, we conduct the first large-scale empirical study of SLMs' vulnerabilities to jailbreak attacks.<n>We identify four key factors: model size, model architecture, training datasets and training techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T08:47:16Z)
• SafeDialBench: A Fine-Grained Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues with Diverse Jailbreak Attacks [90.41592442792181]
  We propose a fine-grained benchmark SafeDialBench for evaluating the safety of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Specifically, we design a two-tier hierarchical safety taxonomy that considers 6 safety dimensions and generates more than 4000 multi-turn dialogues in both Chinese and English under 22 dialogue scenarios.<n> Notably, we construct an innovative assessment framework of LLMs, measuring capabilities in detecting, and handling unsafe information and maintaining consistency when facing jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T12:08:08Z)
• Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents [72.92604341646691]
  We introduce Agent-SafetyBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the safety of large language models (LLMs)<n>Agent-SafetyBench encompasses 349 interaction environments and 2,000 test cases, evaluating 8 categories of safety risks and covering 10 common failure modes frequently encountered in unsafe interactions.<n>Our evaluation of 16 popular LLM agents reveals a concerning result: none of the agents achieves a safety score above 60%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T02:35:15Z)
• Global Challenge for Safe and Secure LLMs Track 1 [57.08717321907755]
  The Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs) is a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO) This paper introduces the Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs), a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO) to foster the development of advanced defense mechanisms against automated jailbreaking attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T08:20:31Z)
• SafeBench: A Safety Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Large Language Models [75.67623347512368]
  We propose toolns, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety evaluations of MLLMs. Our framework consists of a comprehensive harmful query dataset and an automated evaluation protocol. Based on our framework, we conducted large-scale experiments on 15 widely-used open-source MLLMs and 6 commercial MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:14:40Z)
• Characterizing and Evaluating the Reliability of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks [23.782566331783134]
  We focus on 10 cutting-edge jailbreak strategies across three categories, 1525 questions from 61 specific harmful categories, and 13 popular LLMs. We adopt multi-dimensional metrics such as Attack Success Rate (ASR), Toxicity Score, Fluency, Token Length, and Grammatical Errors to thoroughly assess the LLMs' outputs under jailbreak. We explore the relationships among the models, attack strategies, and types of harmful content, as well as the correlations between the evaluation metrics, which proves the validity of our multifaceted evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-18T01:58:03Z)
• Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models [51.83369778259149]
  Large language models (LLMs) may generate insulting and discriminatory content, reflect incorrect social values, and may be used for malicious purposes. To promote the deployment of safe, responsible, and ethical AI, we release SafetyPrompts including 100k augmented prompts and responses by LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T16:27:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.