Characterizing and Evaluating the Reliability of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09326v1
• Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 01:58:03 GMT
• Title: Characterizing and Evaluating the Reliability of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks
• Authors: Kexin Chen, Yi Liu, Dongxia Wang, Jiaying Chen, Wenhai Wang,
• Abstract summary: We focus on 10 cutting-edge jailbreak strategies across three categories, 1525 questions from 61 specific harmful categories, and 13 popular LLMs. We adopt multi-dimensional metrics such as Attack Success Rate (ASR), Toxicity Score, Fluency, Token Length, and Grammatical Errors to thoroughly assess the LLMs' outputs under jailbreak. We explore the relationships among the models, attack strategies, and types of harmful content, as well as the correlations between the evaluation metrics, which proves the validity of our multifaceted evaluation framework.
• Score: 23.782566331783134
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have increasingly become pivotal in content generation with notable societal impact. These models hold the potential to generate content that could be deemed harmful.Efforts to mitigate this risk include implementing safeguards to ensure LLMs adhere to social ethics.However, despite such measures, the phenomenon of "jailbreaking" -- where carefully crafted prompts elicit harmful responses from models -- persists as a significant challenge. Recognizing the continuous threat posed by jailbreaking tactics and their repercussions for the trustworthy use of LLMs, a rigorous assessment of the models' robustness against such attacks is essential. This study introduces an comprehensive evaluation framework and conducts an large-scale empirical experiment to address this need. We concentrate on 10 cutting-edge jailbreak strategies across three categories, 1525 questions from 61 specific harmful categories, and 13 popular LLMs. We adopt multi-dimensional metrics such as Attack Success Rate (ASR), Toxicity Score, Fluency, Token Length, and Grammatical Errors to thoroughly assess the LLMs' outputs under jailbreak. By normalizing and aggregating these metrics, we present a detailed reliability score for different LLMs, coupled with strategic recommendations to reduce their susceptibility to such vulnerabilities. Additionally, we explore the relationships among the models, attack strategies, and types of harmful content, as well as the correlations between the evaluation metrics, which proves the validity of our multifaceted evaluation framework. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate a lack of resilience among all tested LLMs against certain strategies, and highlight the need to concentrate on the reliability facets of LLMs. We believe our study can provide valuable insights into enhancing the security evaluation of LLMs against jailbreak within the domain.

Related papers

• You Can't Eat Your Cake and Have It Too: The Performance Degradation of LLMs with Jailbreak Defense [34.023473699165315]
  We study the utility degradation, safety elevation, and exaggerated-safety escalation of LLMs with jailbreak defense strategies. We find that mainstream jailbreak defenses fail to ensure both safety and performance simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T15:24:29Z)
• Look Before You Leap: Enhancing Attention and Vigilance Regarding Harmful Content with GuidelineLLM [53.79753074854936]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly vulnerable to emerging jailbreak attacks. This vulnerability poses significant risks to the real-world applications. We propose a novel defensive paradigm called GuidelineLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T12:42:33Z)
• SafeBench: A Safety Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Large Language Models [75.67623347512368]
  We propose toolns, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety evaluations of MLLMs. Our framework consists of a comprehensive harmful query dataset and an automated evaluation protocol. Based on our framework, we conducted large-scale experiments on 15 widely-used open-source MLLMs and 6 commercial MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:14:40Z)
• Cognitive Overload Attack:Prompt Injection for Long Context [39.61095361609769]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in performing tasks without needing explicit retraining. This capability, known as In-Context Learning (ICL), exposes LLMs to adversarial prompts and jailbreaks that manipulate safety-trained LLMs into generating undesired or harmful output. We apply the principles of Cognitive Load Theory in LLMs and empirically validate that similar to human cognition, LLMs also suffer from cognitive overload. We show that advanced models such as GPT-4, Claude-3.5 Sonnet, Claude-3 OPUS, Llama-3-70B-Instruct, Gemini-1.0-Pro, and
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T04:53:34Z)
• PathSeeker: Exploring LLM Security Vulnerabilities with a Reinforcement Learning-Based Jailbreak Approach [25.31933913962953]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread use, raising concerns about their security. We introduce PathSeeker, a novel black-box jailbreak method, which is inspired by the game of rats escaping a maze. Our method outperforms five state-of-the-art attack techniques when tested across 13 commercial and open-source LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T15:36:26Z)
• Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning [61.2224355547598]
  Open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress. Our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief. By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T13:22:54Z)
• ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming [64.86326523181553]
  ALERT is a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy. It aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T15:01:47Z)
• Fine-Tuning, Quantization, and LLMs: Navigating Unintended Outcomes [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption across various domains, including chatbots and auto-task completion agents. These models are susceptible to safety vulnerabilities such as jailbreaking, prompt injection, and privacy leakage attacks. This study investigates the impact of these modifications on LLM safety, a critical consideration for building reliable and secure AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T20:31:45Z)
• Flames: Benchmarking Value Alignment of LLMs in Chinese [86.73527292670308]
  This paper proposes a value alignment benchmark named Flames. It encompasses both common harmlessness principles and a unique morality dimension that integrates specific Chinese values. Our findings indicate that all the evaluated LLMs demonstrate relatively poor performance on Flames.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T17:18:21Z)
• Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models [51.83369778259149]
  Large language models (LLMs) may generate insulting and discriminatory content, reflect incorrect social values, and may be used for malicious purposes. To promote the deployment of safe, responsible, and ethical AI, we release SafetyPrompts including 100k augmented prompts and responses by LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T16:27:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.