CoVerRL: Breaking the Consensus Trap in Label-Free Reasoning via Generator-Verifier Co-Evolution

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17775v2
• Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 06:36:19 GMT
• Title: CoVerRL: Breaking the Consensus Trap in Label-Free Reasoning via Generator-Verifier Co-Evolution
• Abstract summary: CoVerRL is a framework where a single model alternates between generator and verifier roles, with each capability bootstrapping the other.<n> Experiments across Qwen and Llama model families demonstrate that CoVerRL outperforms label-free baselines by 4.7-5.9% on mathematical reasoning benchmarks.<n>Self-verification accuracy improves from around 55% to over 85%, confirming that both capabilities genuinely co-evolve.
• Score: 52.691495954442985
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Label-free reinforcement learning enables large language models to improve reasoning capabilities without ground-truth supervision, typically by treating majority-voted answers as pseudo-labels. However, we identify a critical failure mode: as training maximizes self-consistency, output diversity collapses, causing the model to confidently reinforce systematic errors that evade detection. We term this the consensus trap. To escape it, we propose CoVerRL, a framework where a single model alternates between generator and verifier roles, with each capability bootstrapping the other. Majority voting provides noisy but informative supervision for training the verifier, while the improving verifier progressively filters self-consistent errors from pseudo-labels. This co-evolution creates a virtuous cycle that maintains high reward accuracy throughout training. Experiments across Qwen and Llama model families demonstrate that CoVerRL outperforms label-free baselines by 4.7-5.9% on mathematical reasoning benchmarks. Moreover, self-verification accuracy improves from around 55% to over 85%, confirming that both capabilities genuinely co-evolve.

Related papers

• Co-RL: Unsupervised Reasoning Emerges from Diverse Cohort in Multi-agent RL [55.05743310621117]
  Co-RL is a framework in which multiple decoupled models, sharing no parameters, are simultaneously optimized through RL using rewards derived from their peers.<n>We show that increasing cohort diversity, through heterogeneous model families, sizes, and rephrased training samples, reduces the correlated errors that drive self-reinforcing feedback loops.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T01:16:02Z)
• Consensus as Privileged Context for Label-Free Self-Distillation [12.523025093871304]
  CANON (Consensus-ANchored self-distillatiON) is a label-free training method that turns consensus into dense, token-level supervision.<n>CanON improves pass@1 by up to 12 points, outperforming label-free reinforcement learning by 6 points at a seventh of its compute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T09:39:32Z)
• Label-Free Reinforcement Learning via Cross-Model Entropy [4.404496835736175]
  Post-training large language models with reinforcement learning are bottlenecked by the reward signal.<n>We propose Cross-Model Entropy (CME) as a label-free reward signal for RL post-training.<n>CME is continuous, training-free, and grounded in the principle that responses a verifier finds unsurprising are likely correct or high quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T19:04:35Z)
• CyberCorrect: A Cybernetic Framework for Closed-Loop Self-Correction in Large Language Models [9.281774217584289]
  CyberCorrect is a framework that formalizes large language model self-correction.<n>A type-directed Correction Controller generates repair instructions based on diagnosed error categories.<n>A Convergence Judge determines iteration termination using stability criteria adapted from control theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T07:47:34Z)
• The Illusion of Certainty: Decoupling Capability and Calibration in On-Policy Distillation [67.26315138466312]
  We propose a calibration-aware OPD framework, CaOPD, that estimates empirical confidence from model rollouts.<n>Our findings highlight that capability distillation does not imply confidence, and that confidence should be treated as an essential objective in post-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-18T04:43:40Z)
• Correct Answers from Sound Reasoning: Verifiable Process Supervision for Language Models [94.68358825189738]
  We propose a post-training framework for verifiable domains that jointly optimize prediction accuracy and reasoning quality.<n>We evaluate VPS on chess, a controlled testbed where reasoning steps can be deterministically verified against engine signals.<n>VPS preserves accuracy while significantly improving reasoning quality, reducing win-rate error by up to 30% and restoring consistency to near saturation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T15:19:46Z)
• What If Consensus Lies? Selective-Complementary Reinforcement Learning at Test Time [57.533031432715084]
  Test-Time Reinforcement Learning (TTRL) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance reasoning capabilities on unlabeled test streams.<n>Existing TTRL methods rely exclusively on positive pseudo-labeling strategies.<n>We propose SCRL, a robust test-time reinforcement learning framework that effectively mitigates label noise amplification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T11:47:12Z)
• CARE What Fails: Contrastive Anchored-REflection for Verifiable Multimodal [84.71254539482369]
  Group-relative reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) often wastes the most informative data it already has the failures.<n>We present CARE, a failure-centric post-training framework for multimodal reasoning that turns errors into supervision.<n> CARE improves accuracy and training smoothness while explicitly increasing the share of learning signal that comes from failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T16:34:21Z)
• Hybrid Reinforcement: When Reward Is Sparse, It's Better to Be Dense [36.71358559780692]
  HERO is a reinforcement learning framework that integrates verifier signals with reward-model scores in a structured way.<n> HERO consistently outperforms RM-only and verifier-only baselines, with strong gains on both verifiable and hard-to-verify tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T17:09:41Z)
• RESTRAIN: From Spurious Votes to Signals -- Self-Driven RL with Self-Penalization [52.01526898310723]
  We introduce RESTRAIN, a self-penalizing RL framework that converts the absence of gold labels into a useful learning signal.<n>Instead of overcommitting to spurious majority votes, RESTRAIN exploits signals from the model's entire answer distribution.<n>On challenging reasoning benchmarks, RESTRAIN delivers large gains using only unlabeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T16:24:01Z)
• Co-rewarding: Stable Self-supervised RL for Eliciting Reasoning in Large Language Models [56.055015597319674]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is effective to improve the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs)<n>Recent self-rewarding methods investigate a label-free alternative to unlock the reasoning capabilities of LLMs.<n>We propose textitCo-rewarding, a novel self-supervised RL framework that improves training stability by seeking complementary supervision from another views.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T08:09:14Z)
• Can Large Reasoning Models Self-Train? [51.0277533541394]
  We use majority voting as a simple self-feedback mechanism to study whether self-training can be sustained within reinforcement learning.<n>We find that this basic approach improves not only the model's reasoning performance, but also its capability of generating better quality feedback for the next RL iteration.<n>Yet our analysis also reveals a critical limitation of such a self-training paradigm - prolonged RL with self-reward leads to reward hacking, resulting in sudden and complete performance collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T17:16:00Z)
• Latent Veracity Inference for Identifying Errors in Stepwise Reasoning [78.29317733206643]
  We introduce Veracity Search (VS), a discrete search algorithm over veracity assignments.<n>It performs otherwise intractable inference in the posterior distribution over latent veracity values.<n>It generalizes VS, enabling accurate zero-shot veracity inference in novel contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T04:16:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.