SoK: From Silicon to Netlist and Beyond $-$ Two Decades of Hardware Reverse Engineering Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17883v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 16:05:35 GMT
• Title: SoK: From Silicon to Netlist and Beyond $-$ Two Decades of Hardware Reverse Engineering Research
• Abstract summary: Hardware Reverse Engineering (HRE) is foundational for security assurance.<n>HRE enables critical security applications, including design verification, supply-chain assurance, and vulnerability discovery.<n>We present a systematization of knowledge based on an in-depth analysis of 187 peer-reviewed publications.
• Score: 5.914471577927024
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As hardware serves as the root of trust in modern computing systems, Hardware Reverse Engineering (HRE) is foundational for security assurance. In practice, HRE enables critical security applications, including design verification, supply-chain assurance, and vulnerability discovery. Over the past two decades, academic research on Integrated Circuit (IC), Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), and netlist reverse engineering has steadily grown. However, knowledge remains fragmented across domains and communities, which complicates assessing the state of the art and hampers identifying shared research challenges. In this paper, we present a systematization of knowledge based on an in-depth analysis of 187 peer-reviewed publications. Using this corpus, we characterize technical methods across the HRE workflow and identify technical and organizational challenges that impede research progress. We analyze all 30 artifacts from our corpus using established artifact evaluation practices. Key results could be reproduced for only seven publications (4%). Based on our findings, we derive stakeholder-centric recommendations for academia, industry, and government to enable more coordinated and reproducible HRE research. These recommendations target three cross-cutting opportunities: (i) improving reproducibility and reuse via artifact-centric practices, (ii) enabling rigorous comparability through standardized benchmarks and evaluation metrics, and (iii) improving legal clarity for public HRE research.

Related papers

• Revibing Code from Papers: Reimplementing HCI Artifacts [31.5513342575475]
  We demonstrate the potential of new agentic AI technologies to revibe interactive software.<n>To measure the success of the approach, we describe a revibeability metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-01T05:18:25Z)
• AutoResearchBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Complex Scientific Literature Discovery [55.70879973230979]
  AutoResearchBench is a benchmark for autonomous scientific literature discovery.<n>Compared to previous benchmarks on agentic web browsing, AutoResearchBench is research-oriented.<n>Even the most powerful LLMs, despite having largely conquered general agentic web-browsing benchmarks such as BrowseComp, achieve only 9.39% accuracy on Deep Research and 9.31% IoU on Wide Research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T06:05:17Z)
• From Papers to Progress: Rethinking Knowledge Accumulation in Software Engineering [0.8680081568962996]
  We analyze responses from the ICSE 2026 Future of Software Engineering pre-survey.<n>Our analysis reveals a tension between increasing research productivity and the limited mechanisms available for synthesizing results.<n>We argue that addressing these barriers requires rethinking the fundamental properties of research artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T16:19:54Z)
• The Story is Not the Science: Execution-Grounded Evaluation of Mechanistic Interpretability Research [56.80927148740585]
  We address the challenges of scalability and rigor by flipping the dynamic and developing AI agents as research evaluators.<n>We use mechanistic interpretability research as a testbed, build standardized research output, and develop MechEvalAgent.<n>Our work demonstrates the potential of AI agents to transform research evaluation and pave the way for rigorous scientific practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T19:00:02Z)
• Large Language Models for Unit Test Generation: Achievements, Challenges, and the Road Ahead [15.43943391801509]
  Unit testing is an essential yet laborious technique for verifying software.<n>Large Language Models (LLMs) address this limitation by utilizing by leveraging their data-driven knowledge of code semantics and programming patterns.<n>This framework analyzes the literature regarding core generative strategies and a set of enhancement techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T13:30:11Z)
• Triage in Software Engineering: A Systematic Review of Research and Practice [18.03124877437556]
  Triage aims to efficiently prioritize, assign, and assess issues to ensure the reliability of complex environments.<n>The vast amount of heterogeneous data generated by software systems has made effective triage indispensable.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive review of 234 papers from 2004 to the present, offering an in-depth examination of the fundamental concepts, system architecture, and problem statement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T02:42:26Z)
• Executable Knowledge Graphs for Replicating AI Research [65.41207324831583]
  Executable Knowledge Graphs (xKG) is a modular and pluggable knowledge base that automatically integrates technical insights, code snippets, and domain-specific knowledge extracted from scientific literature.<n>Code will released at https://github.com/zjunlp/xKG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T17:53:23Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
  We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z)
• A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [51.26815896167173]
  We present a comprehensive tertiary analysis of PAMI reviews along three complementary dimensions.<n>Our analyses reveal distinctive organizational patterns as well as persistent gaps in current review practices.<n>Finally, our evaluation of state-of-the-art AI-generated reviews indicates encouraging advances in coherence and organization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z)
• REVERSIM: An Open-Source Environment for the Controlled Study of Human Aspects in Hardware Reverse Engineering [5.468342362048975]
  Hardware Reverse Engineering (HRE) is a technique for analyzing integrated circuits.<n>ReverSim is a software environment that models key HRE subprocesses and integrates standardized cognitive tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T18:03:50Z)
• Promoting the Acquisition of Hardware Reverse Engineering Skills [0.7487407411063094]
  This research paper focuses on skill acquisition in Hardware Reverse Engineering (HRE) Even though the scientific community and industry have a high demand for HRE experts, there is a lack of educational courses. To investigate how novices acquire HRE skills in our course, we conducted two studies with students on different levels of prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T10:45:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.