Promoting the Acquisition of Hardware Reverse Engineering Skills

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.13725v1
• Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 10:45:17 GMT
• Title: Promoting the Acquisition of Hardware Reverse Engineering Skills
• Authors: Carina Wiesen and Steffen Becker and Nils Albartus Christof Paar and Nikol Rummel
• Abstract summary: This research paper focuses on skill acquisition in Hardware Reverse Engineering (HRE) Even though the scientific community and industry have a high demand for HRE experts, there is a lack of educational courses. To investigate how novices acquire HRE skills in our course, we conducted two studies with students on different levels of prior knowledge.
• Score: 0.7487407411063094
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This full research paper focuses on skill acquisition in Hardware Reverse Engineering (HRE) - an important field of cyber security. HRE is a prevalent technique routinely employed by security engineers (i) to detect malicious hardware manipulations, (ii) to conduct VLSI failure analysis, (iii) to identify IP infringements, and (iv) to perform competitive analyses. Even though the scientific community and industry have a high demand for HRE experts, there is a lack of educational courses. We developed a university-level HRE course based on general cognitive psychological research on skill acquisition, as research on the acquisition of HRE skills is lacking thus far. To investigate how novices acquire HRE skills in our course, we conducted two studies with students on different levels of prior knowledge. Our results show that cognitive factors (e.g., working memory), and prior experiences (e.g., in symmetric cryptography) influence the acquisition of HRE skills. We conclude by discussing implications for future HRE courses and by outlining ideas for future research that would lead to a more comprehensive understanding of skill acquisition in this important field of cyber security.

Related papers

• Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
  Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks. In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z)
• Ontology-Aware RAG for Improved Question-Answering in Cybersecurity Education [13.838970688067725]
  AI-driven question-answering (QA) systems can actively manage uncertainty in cybersecurity problem-solving. Large language models (LLMs) have gained prominence in AI-driven QA systems, offering advanced language understanding and user engagement. We propose CyberRAG, an ontology-aware retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach for developing a reliable and safe QA system in cybersecurity education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T21:52:35Z)
• An Evidence-Based Curriculum Initiative for Hardware Reverse Engineering Education [5.794342083222512]
  This paper investigates the current state of education in hardware security and HRE. We identify common topics, threat models, key pedagogical features, and course evaluation methods. We suggest several possible improvements to HRE education and offer recommendations for developing new training courses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T14:23:04Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Safetywashing: Do AI Safety Benchmarks Actually Measure Safety Progress? [59.96471873997733]
  We propose an empirical foundation for developing more meaningful safety metrics and define AI safety in a machine learning research context. We aim to provide a more rigorous framework for AI safety research, advancing the science of safety evaluations and clarifying the path towards measurable progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T17:59:24Z)
• Requirements for a Career in Information Security: A Comprehensive Review [0.0]
  The primary objective is to increase public awareness regarding the diverse opportunities available in the Information Security (IS) field. Thematic analysis was conducted on these studies to identify and delineate the crucial knowledge and skills that an IS professional should possess. The study recognizes the existence of gender-related obstacles for women pursuing cybersecurity careers due to the field's unique requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-07T16:41:13Z)
• REVERSIM: A Game-Based Environment to Study Human Aspects in Hardware Reverse Engineering [5.468342362048975]
  Hardware Reverse Engineering (HRE) is a technique for analyzing Integrated Circuits (ICs) We have developed REVERSIM, a game-based environment that mimics realistic HRE subprocesses and can integrate standardized cognitive tests. REVERSIM enables quantitative studies with easier-to-recruit non-experts to uncover cognitive factors relevant to HRE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T18:03:50Z)
• Towards Quantum Federated Learning [80.1976558772771]
  Quantum Federated Learning aims to enhance privacy, security, and efficiency in the learning process. We aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the principles, techniques, and emerging applications of QFL. As the field of QFL continues to progress, we can anticipate further breakthroughs and applications across various industries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T15:40:21Z)
• On the Security Risks of Knowledge Graph Reasoning [71.64027889145261]
  We systematize the security threats to KGR according to the adversary's objectives, knowledge, and attack vectors. We present ROAR, a new class of attacks that instantiate a variety of such threats. We explore potential countermeasures against ROAR, including filtering of potentially poisoning knowledge and training with adversarially augmented queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T18:47:42Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.