Shifting Uncertainty to Critical Moments: Towards Reliable Uncertainty Quantification for VLA Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18342v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 22:52:03 GMT
• Title: Shifting Uncertainty to Critical Moments: Towards Reliable Uncertainty Quantification for VLA Model
• Abstract summary: We propose a unified uncertainty quantification approach for predicting rollout success versus failure.<n>Our method substantially improves failure prediction accuracy and yields more reliable signals for failure detection.
• Score: 10.781664119473966
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable general-purpose robotic policies by mapping visual observations and language instructions to low-level actions, but they often lack reliable introspection. A common practice is to compute a token-level uncertainty signal and take its mean over a rollout. However, mean aggregation can dilute short-lived but safety-critical uncertainty spikes in continuous control. In particular, successful rollouts may contain localized high-entropy segments due to benign noise or non-critical micro-adjustments, while failure rollouts can appear low-entropy for most timesteps and only exhibit brief spikes near the onset of failure. We propose a unified uncertainty quantification approach for predicting rollout success versus failure that (1) uses max-based sliding window pooling to preserve transient risk signals, (2) applies motion-aware stability weighting to emphasize high-frequency action oscillations associated with unstable behaviors, and (3) performs DoF-adaptive calibration via Bayesian Optimization to prioritize kinematically critical axes. Experiments on the LIBERO benchmark show that our method substantially improves failure prediction accuracy and yields more reliable signals for failure detection, which can support downstream human-in-the-loop interventions.

Related papers

• Perturbation-Based Uncertainty for Failure Detection in Vision-Language-Action Models [5.736588561666141]
  We propose a model-agnostic framework for inference-time uncertainty estimation through hidden activation perturbations.<n>We show that perturbation-based uncertainty consistently improves failure detection under distribution shift compared to sampling-based uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T05:41:45Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for Flow-Based Vision-Language-Action Models [33.28454469934064]
  Vision-language-action models (VLAs) combine vision-language backbones with expressive generative action heads trained via flow matching on large-scale robotic datasets.<n>Despite their strong empirical performance in robotic manipulation, VLAs lack mechanisms to quantify confidence in their predictions and to detect when their actions may be unreliable.<n>We propose SAVE, a framework for uncertainty-guided active fine-tuning that reduces the number of costly expert demonstrations required to adapt VLAs to new tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T15:19:09Z)
• ReconVLA: An Uncertainty-Guided and Failure-Aware Vision-Language-Action Framework for Robotic Control [7.018221049093963]
  Vision-language-action (VLA) models have emerged as generalist robotic controllers capable of mapping visual observations and natural language instructions to continuous action sequences.<n>We introduce ReconVLA, a reliable conformal model that produces uncertainty-guided and failure-aware control signals.<n>Our results show that conformalized action predictions consistently improve failure anticipation, reduce catastrophic errors, and provide a calibrated measure of confidence without retraining or modifying the underlying VLA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T20:20:43Z)
• Gradients Must Earn Their Influence: Unifying SFT with Generalized Entropic Objectives [22.29000001610794]
  Standard negative log-likelihood for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) applies uniform token-level weighting.<n>This rigidity creates a two-fold failure mode: (i) overemphasizing low-probability targets can amplify gradients on noisy supervision and disrupt robust priors, and (ii) uniform weighting provides weak sharpening when the model is already confident.<n>Existing methods fail to resolve the resulting plasticity--stability dilemma, often suppressing necessary learning signals alongside harmful ones.<n>We introduce Dynamic Entropy Fine-Tuning (DEFT), a parameter-free objective that modulates the
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T22:56:43Z)
• "I May Not Have Articulated Myself Clearly": Diagnosing Dynamic Instability in LLM Reasoning at Inference Time [1.570719611178015]
  Reasoning failures in large language models (LLMs) are typically measured only at the end of a generation, yet many failures manifest as a process-level breakdown.<n>We define a simple instability signal that combines consecutive-step distributional shift (JSD) and uncertainty (entropy)<n>Across GSM8K and HotpotQA, instability strength predicts wrong answers with above-chance AUC and yields monotonic bucket-level accuracy decline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T22:11:25Z)
• Noise-Robust Tiny Object Localization with Flows [63.60972031108944]
  We propose a noise-robust localization framework leveraging normalizing flows for flexible error modeling and uncertainty-guided optimization.<n>Our method captures complex, non-Gaussian prediction distributions through flow-based error modeling, enabling robust learning under noisy supervision.<n>An uncertainty-aware gradient modulation mechanism further suppresses learning from high-uncertainty, noise-prone samples, mitigating overfitting while stabilizing training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-02T09:16:55Z)
• Towards Adversarial Robustness and Uncertainty Quantification in DINOv2-based Few-Shot Anomaly Detection [6.288045889067255]
  Foundation models such as DINOv2 have shown strong performance in few-shot anomaly detection.<n>We present one of the first systematic studies of adversarial attacks and uncertainty estimation in this setting.<n>We find that raw anomaly scores are poorly calibrated, revealing a gap between confidence and correctness that limits safety-critical use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T15:06:45Z)
• ResAD: Normalized Residual Trajectory Modeling for End-to-End Autonomous Driving [64.42138266293202]
  ResAD is a Normalized Residual Trajectory Modeling framework.<n>It reframes the learning task to predict the residual deviation from an inertial reference.<n>On the NAVSIM benchmark, ResAD achieves a state-of-the-art PDMS of 88.6 using a vanilla diffusion policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:59:36Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Reliability: Selective Prediction and Trustworthy Deployment in Modern Machine Learning [1.2183405753834562]
  This thesis investigates how uncertainty estimation can enhance the safety and trustworthiness of machine learning (ML) systems.<n>We first show that a model's training trajectory contains rich uncertainty signals that can be exploited without altering its architecture or loss.<n>We propose a lightweight, post-hoc abstention method that works across tasks, avoids the cost of deep ensembles, and achieves state-of-the-art selective prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T02:33:53Z)
• Selective Learning: Towards Robust Calibration with Dynamic Regularization [79.92633587914659]
  Miscalibration in deep learning refers to there is a discrepancy between the predicted confidence and performance. We introduce Dynamic Regularization (DReg) which aims to learn what should be learned during training thereby circumventing the confidence adjusting trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T11:25:20Z)
• When Does Confidence-Based Cascade Deferral Suffice? [69.28314307469381]
  Cascades are a classical strategy to enable inference cost to vary adaptively across samples. A deferral rule determines whether to invoke the next classifier in the sequence, or to terminate prediction. Despite being oblivious to the structure of the cascade, confidence-based deferral often works remarkably well in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T04:13:57Z)
• Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definition [109.62614226793833]
  The trade-off between robustness and accuracy has been widely studied in the adversarial literature. We find that it may stem from the improperly defined robust error, which imposes an inductive bias of local invariance. By definition, SCORE facilitates the reconciliation between robustness and accuracy, while still handling the worst-case uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T10:36:09Z)
• Discriminative Jackknife: Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning via Higher-Order Influence Functions [121.10450359856242]
  We develop a frequentist procedure that utilizes influence functions of a model's loss functional to construct a jackknife (or leave-one-out) estimator of predictive confidence intervals. The DJ satisfies (1) and (2), is applicable to a wide range of deep learning models, is easy to implement, and can be applied in a post-hoc fashion without interfering with model training or compromising its accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T13:36:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.