MoRI: Learning Motivation-Grounded Reasoning for Scientific Ideation in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19044v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 15:39:38 GMT
• Title: MoRI: Learning Motivation-Grounded Reasoning for Scientific Ideation in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: We propose textbfMoRI (textbfMotivation-grounded textbfReasoning for Scientific textbfIdeation) as a framework to explicitly learn the reasoning process from research motivations to methodologies.<n>MoRI significantly outperforms strong commercial LLMs and complex agentic baselines across multiple dimensions, including novelty, technical rigor, and feasibility.
• Score: 3.5060208861040127
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Scientific ideation aims to propose novel solutions within a given scientific context. Existing LLM-based agentic approaches emulate human research workflows, yet inadequately model scientific reasoning, resulting in surface-level conceptual recombinations that lack technical depth and scientific grounding. To address this issue, we propose \textbf{MoRI} (\textbf{Mo}tivation-grounded \textbf{R}easoning for Scientific \textbf{I}deation), a framework that enables LLMs to explicitly learn the reasoning process from research motivations to methodologies. The base LLM is initialized via supervised fine-tuning to generate a research motivation from a given context, and is subsequently trained under a composite reinforcement learning reward that approximates scientific rigor: (1) entropy-aware information gain encourages the model to uncover and elaborate high-complexity technical details grounded in ground-truth methodologies, and (2) contrastive semantic gain constrains the reasoning trajectory to maintain conceptually aligned with scientifically valid solutions. Empirical results show that MoRI significantly outperforms strong commercial LLMs and complex agentic baselines across multiple dimensions, including novelty, technical rigor, and feasibility. The code will be made available on \href{https://github.com/ECNU-Text-Computing/IdeaGeneration}{GitHub}.

Related papers

• ECLAIR: A Causally-Grounded AI Framework for Scientific Discovery in Empirical Software Engineering [51.19819833971252]
  This paper introduces ECLAIR, a causally grounded AI framework that integrates Large Language Models into every stage of the scientific process.<n>ECLAIR treats LLMs as active scientific agents operating under the principles of causal inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T14:47:03Z)
• MolQuest: A Benchmark for Agentic Evaluation of Abductive Reasoning in Chemical Structure Elucidation [20.62843594129358]
  We introduce MolQuest, a novel agent-based evaluation framework for molecular structure elucidation.<n>Unlike existing datasets, MolQuest formalizes molecular structure elucidation as a multi-turn interactive task.<n>Results reveal that contemporary frontier models exhibit significant limitations in authentic scientific scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T09:57:17Z)
• Probing Scientific General Intelligence of LLMs with Scientist-Aligned Workflows [203.3527268311731]
  We present an operational SGI definition grounded in the Practical Inquiry Model (PIM)<n>We operationalize it via four scientist-aligned tasks: deep research, idea generation, dry/wet experiments, and experimental reasoning.<n>Our PIM-grounded definition, workflow-centric benchmark, and empirical insights establish a foundation for AI systems that genuinely participate in scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T12:44:36Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery [91.732562776782]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to scientific research, yet prevailing science benchmarks probe decontextualized knowledge.<n>We introduce a scenario-grounded benchmark that evaluates LLMs across biology, chemistry, materials, and physics.<n>The framework assesses models at two levels: (i) question-level accuracy on scenario-tied items and (ii) project-level performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T16:20:03Z)
• Graph Your Way to Inspiration: Integrating Co-Author Graphs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Model Based Scientific Idea Generation [1.2232326171442904]
  This paper proposes a scientific idea generation system called GYWI.<n>It combines author knowledge graphs with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to form an external knowledge base.<n>The generated ideas are evaluated from the following five dimensions: novelty, feasibility, clarity, relevance, and significance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T03:38:23Z)
• Deep Ideation: Designing LLM Agents to Generate Novel Research Ideas on Scientific Concept Network [9.317340414316446]
  We propose a framework to integrate a scientific network that captures keyword co-occurrence and contextual relationships.<n>A critic engine, trained on real-world reviewer feedback, guides the process by providing continuous feedback on the novelty and feasibility of ideas.<n>Our approach improves the quality of generated ideas by 10.67% compared to other methods, with ideas surpassing top conference acceptance levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T04:00:20Z)
• Demystifying Scientific Problem-Solving in LLMs by Probing Knowledge and Reasoning [53.82037883518254]
  We introduce SciReas, a diverse suite of existing benchmarks for scientific reasoning tasks.<n>We then propose KRUX, a probing framework for studying the distinct roles of reasoning and knowledge in scientific tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T17:04:23Z)
• Computational Thinking Reasoning in Large Language Models [69.28428524878885]
  Computational Thinking Model (CTM) is a novel framework that incorporates computational thinking paradigms into large language models (LLMs)<n>Live code execution is seamlessly integrated into the reasoning process, allowing CTM to think by computing.<n>CTM outperforms conventional reasoning models and tool-augmented baselines in terms of accuracy, interpretability, and generalizability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T09:11:15Z)
• Advancing AI-Scientist Understanding: Multi-Agent LLMs with Interpretable Physics Reasoning [0.7499722271664147]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are playing an increasingly important role in physics research by assisting with symbolic manipulation, numerical computation, and scientific reasoning.<n>We introduce a novel multi-agent LLM physicist framework that fosters collaboration between AI and human scientists through three key modules.<n>A case study demonstrates that our approach significantly improves interpretability, enables systematic validation, and enhances human-AI collaboration in physics problem-solving and discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T17:13:16Z)
• Position: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Significantly Advance Scientific Reasoning [51.11965014462375]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) integrate text, images, and other modalities.<n>This paper argues that MLLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning across disciplines such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T04:05:27Z)
• Improving Scientific Hypothesis Generation with Knowledge Grounded Large Language Models [20.648157071328807]
  Large language models (LLMs) can identify novel research directions by analyzing existing knowledge. LLMs are prone to generating hallucinations'', outputs that are plausible-sounding but factually incorrect. We propose KG-CoI, a system that enhances LLM hypothesis generation by integrating external, structured knowledge from knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:50:00Z)
• LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discovery [141.39722070734737]
  We propose to enhance the knowledge-driven, abstract reasoning abilities of Large Language Models with the computational strength of simulations. We introduce Scientific Generative Agent (SGA), a bilevel optimization framework. We conduct experiments to demonstrate our framework's efficacy in law discovery and molecular design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T03:04:10Z)
• Rethinking Scientific Summarization Evaluation: Grounding Explainable Metrics on Facet-aware Benchmark [42.131133762827375]
  This paper presents conceptual and experimental analyses of scientific summarization.<n>We introduce the Facet-aware Metric (FM), employing LLMs for advanced semantic matching to evaluate summaries.<n>Our findings confirm that FM offers a more logical approach to evaluating scientific summaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T07:58:29Z)
• SciInstruct: a Self-Reflective Instruction Annotated Dataset for Training Scientific Language Models [57.96527452844273]
  We introduce SciInstruct, a suite of scientific instructions for training scientific language models capable of college-level scientific reasoning. We curated a diverse and high-quality dataset encompassing physics, chemistry, math, and formal proofs. To verify the effectiveness of SciInstruct, we fine-tuned different language models with SciInstruct, i.e., ChatGLM3 (6B and 32B), Llama3-8B-Instruct, and Mistral-7B: MetaMath.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T20:22:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.