FIPO: Eliciting Deep Reasoning with Future-KL Influenced Policy Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19835v2
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 03:56:41 GMT
- Title: FIPO: Eliciting Deep Reasoning with Future-KL Influenced Policy Optimization
- Abstract summary: We present Future-KL Influenced Policy Optimization (FIPO), a reinforcement learning algorithm designed to overcome reasoning bottlenecks in large language models.<n>FIPO addresses this by incorporating discounted future-KL divergence into the policy update, creating a dense advantage formulation that re-weights tokens based on their influence on subsequent trajectory behavior.<n> evaluated on Qwen2.5-32B, FIPO extends the average chain-of-thought length from roughly 4,000 to over 10,000 tokens and increases AIME 2024 Pass@1 accuracy from 50.0% to a peak of 58.0%.
- Score: 84.58281577727566
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We present Future-KL Influenced Policy Optimization (FIPO), a reinforcement learning algorithm designed to overcome reasoning bottlenecks in large language models. While GRPO style training scales effectively, it typically relies on outcome-based rewards (ORM) that distribute a global advantage uniformly across every token in a trajectory. We argue that this coarse-grained credit assignment imposes a performance ceiling by failing to distinguish critical logical pivots from trivial tokens. FIPO addresses this by incorporating discounted future-KL divergence into the policy update, creating a dense advantage formulation that re-weights tokens based on their influence on subsequent trajectory behavior. Empirically, FIPO enables models to break through the length stagnation seen in standard baselines. Evaluated on Qwen2.5-32B, FIPO extends the average chain-of-thought length from roughly 4,000 to over 10,000 tokens and increases AIME 2024 Pass@1 accuracy from 50.0% to a peak of 58.0% (converging at approximately 56.0\%). This outperforms both DeepSeek-R1-Zero-Math-32B (around 47.0%) and o1-mini (approximately 56.0%). Our results suggest that establishing dense advantage formulations is a vital path for evolving ORM-based algorithms to unlock the full reasoning potential of base models. We open-source our training system, built on the verl framework.
Related papers
- Beyond Entropy: Learning from Token-Level Distributional Deviations for LLM Reasoning [36.34371525731833]
We introduce the Independent Combinatorial Tokens (ICT) framework, which shifts the optimization focus from scalar uncertainty to the distributional properties of token logits.<n>Our theoretical analysis, grounded in both Shannon and second-order Rényi entropy, proves that selectively updating on these tokens regulates policy concentration.<n> Empirical results demonstrate that updating only the top 10% of unique tokens on Qwen2.5 (0.5B/1.5B/7B) models yields an average pass@4 improvement of 4.58%, with a maximum gain of 14.9%, over GRPO, 20-Entropy, and STAPO baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-18T04:11:56Z) - STARE: Surprisal-Guided Token-Level Advantage Reweighting for Policy Entropy Stability [78.63876433996107]
We conduct a first-order gradient analysis of token-level entropy dynamics under GRPO.<n>We propose STARE, which identifies entropy-critical token subsets via batch-internal surprisal quantiles.<n>On AIME24 and AIME25, STARE outperforms DAPO and other competitive baselines by 4%-8% in average accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T16:13:42Z) - Advantage Collapse in Group Relative Policy Optimization: Diagnosis and Mitigation [13.272542054938258]
We introduce the Advantage Collapse Rate (ACR), the first metric quantifying the proportion of training batches with ineffective gradients.<n>We then propose Adaptive Virtual Sample Policy Optimization (AVSPO), a lightweight extension of GRPO that injects virtual reward samples.<n>AVSPO reduces advantage collapse by 58-63% relative to GRPO and yields consistent accuracy gains of 4-6 percentage points across all model scales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T12:57:37Z) - Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning [72.25890308541334]
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serves as the de facto standard algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization (DPPO), which substitutes clipping with a more principled constraint.<n>DPPO achieves superior training and efficiency compared to existing methods, offering a more robust foundation for RL-based fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T18:59:04Z) - PRPO: Aligning Process Reward with Outcome Reward in Policy Optimization [15.965340493880701]
We introduce Process Relative Policy Optimization (PRPO), which combines outcome reliability with process-level guidance in a critic-free framework.<n>PRPO segments reasoning sequences based on semantic clues, normalizes PRM scores into token-level advantages, and aligns their distribution with outcome advantages.<n>On MATH500, PRPO improves Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B accuracy from 61.2% to 64.4% over GRPO using only eight rollouts and no value network.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T04:04:43Z) - Future Policy Aware Preference Learning for Mathematical Reasoning [15.444539171776983]
A key challenge is the large token overlap between preferred and dispreferred trajectories.<n>We propose Future Policy Aware (FPA) preference learning, which replaces the current policy with a future policy in the regularization term.<n>FPA yields consistent performance gains, with the largest improvements observed with SimPER, achieving gains of up to 5.75%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T08:44:12Z) - Perception-Aware Policy Optimization for Multimodal Reasoning [79.56070395437898]
A major source of error in current multimodal reasoning lies in the perception of visual inputs.<n>We propose PAPO, a novel policy gradient algorithm that encourages the model to learn to perceive while learning to reason.<n>We observe a substantial reduction of 30.5% in perception errors, indicating improved perceptual capabilities with PAPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-08T23:22:34Z) - Pre-Trained Policy Discriminators are General Reward Models [81.3974586561645]
We propose a scalable pre-training method named Policy Discriminative Learning (POLAR)<n>POLAR trains a reward model (RM) to discern identical policies and discriminate different ones.<n> Empirical results show that POLAR substantially outperforms traditional non-pre-trained methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T16:56:31Z) - KTAE: A Model-Free Algorithm to Key-Tokens Advantage Estimation in Mathematical Reasoning [19.25257653416883]
Key-token Advantage Estimation (KTAE) is a novel algorithm that estimates fine-grained, token-level advantages without introducing additional models.<n>We show that models trained with GRPO+KTAE and DAPO+KTAE outperform baseline methods across five mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T16:00:33Z) - Exploring the Limit of Outcome Reward for Learning Mathematical Reasoning [65.2421542320293]
Reasoning abilities are crucial components of general intelligence.<n>Recent advances by proprietary companies, such as o-series models of OpenAI, have made remarkable progress on reasoning tasks.<n>This paper proposes a new RL framework, termed OREAL, to pursue the performance limit that can be achieved through textbfOutcome textbfREwtextbfArd-based reinforcement textbfLearning for mathematical reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-10T18:57:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.