Advantage Collapse in Group Relative Policy Optimization: Diagnosis and Mitigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21125v1
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 12:57:37 GMT
• Title: Advantage Collapse in Group Relative Policy Optimization: Diagnosis and Mitigation
• Abstract summary: We introduce the Advantage Collapse Rate (ACR), the first metric quantifying the proportion of training batches with ineffective gradients.<n>We then propose Adaptive Virtual Sample Policy Optimization (AVSPO), a lightweight extension of GRPO that injects virtual reward samples.<n>AVSPO reduces advantage collapse by 58-63% relative to GRPO and yields consistent accuracy gains of 4-6 percentage points across all model scales.
• Score: 13.272542054938258
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), a prominent algorithm within the Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) framework, has achieved strong results in improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, GRPO is prone to advantage collapse, a failure mode where homogeneous rewards within a group (e.g., all correct or all incorrect answers) yield near-zero advantages and vanishing gradients. To address this, we introduce the Advantage Collapse Rate (ACR), the first diagnostic metric quantifying the proportion of training batches with ineffective gradients. Across models from 0.5B to 14B parameters on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, we show that ACR strongly predicts training stagnation and final performance. We then propose Adaptive Virtual Sample Policy Optimization (AVSPO), a lightweight extension of GRPO that injects virtual reward samples, guided by real-time ACR monitoring, to enable learning from homogeneous groups without additional model rollouts. AVSPO reduces advantage collapse by 58-63% relative to GRPO and yields consistent accuracy gains of 4-6 percentage points across all model scales, while maintaining generalization on the evaluated out-of-domain task. Code and datasets are available at https://qingyonghu.github.io/AVSPO.

Related papers

• Revisiting Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards from a Contrastive Perspective [10.958642517467721]
  We present a framework for Contrastive Sequence-level Policy Optimization in RLVR.<n>ConSPO replaces GRPO's clipped ratio-based scores with length-normalized sequence log-probabilities.<n>ConSPO consistently outperforms several strong RLVR baselines on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T04:02:36Z)
• GRPO-VPS: Enhancing Group Relative Policy Optimization with Verifiable Process Supervision for Effective Reasoning [48.32628338889922]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization suffers from indiscriminate credit assignment for intermediate steps.<n>We introduce a model-free and verifiable process supervision via probing the model's belief in the correct answer.<n>This approach enables more targeted and sample-efficient policy updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T15:08:58Z)
• Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data [55.84428098924793]
  We propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration.<n>We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance.<n> Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T16:43:28Z)
• When Right Meets Wrong: Bilateral Context Conditioning with Reward-Confidence Correction for GRPO [18.988527161000203]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as an effective method for training reasoning models.<n>We present a contrastive reformulation of GRPO, showing that the GRPO objective implicitly maximizes the margin between the policy ratios of correct and incorrect samples.<n>We propose Bilateral Context Conditioning (BICC), a mechanism that allows the model to cross-reference successful and failed reasoning traces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T16:25:02Z)
• Unbiased Dynamic Pruning for Efficient Group-Based Policy Optimization [60.87651283510059]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) effectively scales LLM reasoning but incurs prohibitive computational costs.<n>We propose Dynamic Pruning Policy Optimization (DPPO), a framework that enables dynamic pruning while preserving unbiased gradient estimation.<n>To mitigate the data sparsity induced by pruning, we introduce Dense Prompt Packing, a window-based greedy strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T14:48:53Z)
• iGRPO: Self-Feedback-Driven LLM Reasoning [88.83313431248473]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in solving complex mathematical problems, yet they still fall short of producing accurate and consistent solutions.<n>We introduce Iterative Group Relative Policy Optimization (iGRPO), a two-stage extension of GRPO that adds dynamic self-conditioning through model-generated drafts.<n>Under matched rollout budgets, iGRPO consistently outperforms GRPO across base models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T18:45:11Z)
• From Absolute to Relative: Rethinking Reward Shaping in Group-Based Reinforcement Learning [7.6602542594279335]
  We propose Reinforcement Learning with Relative Rewards to shift reward shaping from absolute scoring to relative ranking.<n>We show that RLRR yields consistent performance improvements over standard group-based baselines across reasoning benchmarks and open-ended generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T15:07:06Z)
• GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization [133.27496265096445]
  We show how to apply Group Relative Policy Optimization under multi-reward setting without examining its suitability.<n>We then introduce Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (GDPO), a new policy optimization method to resolve these issues.<n>GDPO consistently outperforms GRPO, demonstrating its effectiveness and generalizability for multi-reward reinforcement learning optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T18:59:24Z)
• Anchoring Values in Temporal and Group Dimensions for Flow Matching Model Alignment [61.80228667422234]
  VGPO redefines value estimation across both temporal and group dimensions.<n>It transforms the sparse terminal reward into dense, process-aware value estimates.<n>It replaces standard group normalization with a novel process enhanced by absolute values to maintain a stable optimization signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-13T16:31:26Z)
• NGRPO: Negative-enhanced Group Relative Policy Optimization [8.641009168869195]
  A representative RLVR algorithm, GRPO, suffers from a critical limitation when all responses within a group are either entirely correct or entirely incorrect.<n>This is particularly problematic for homogeneously incorrect groups, where GRPO's advantage function yields a value of zero.<n>We propose NGRPO, an algorithm designed to convert homogeneous errors into robust learning signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T09:38:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.