Discovery of Decision Synchronization Patterns from Event Logs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19879v1
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 11:47:02 GMT
- Title: Discovery of Decision Synchronization Patterns from Event Logs
- Abstract summary: Synchronizing decisions between running cases in business processes facilitates fair and efficient use of resources.<n>This paper proposes an approach for discovering decision synchronization patterns inspired by supply chain processes.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Synchronizing decisions between running cases in business processes facilitates fair and efficient use of resources, helps prioritize the most valuable cases, and prevents unnecessary waiting. Consequently, decision synchronization patterns are regularly built into processes, in the form of mechanisms that temporarily delay one case to favor another. These decision mechanisms therefore consider properties of multiple cases at once, rather than just the properties of a single case; an aspect that is rarely addressed by current process discovery techniques. To address this gap, this paper proposes an approach for discovering decision synchronization patterns inspired by supply chain processes. These decision synchronization patterns take the form of specific process constructs combined with a constraint that determines which particular case to execute. We describe, formalize and demonstrate how the constraint for four such patterns can be discovered. We evaluate our approach in two artificial scenarios. First, with four separate process models each containing a single decision synchronization pattern, i.e., we demonstrate that our approach can discover every type of pattern when only this one type is present. Second, we consider a process model containing all four decision synchronization patterns to show generalizability of the approach to more complex problems. For both scenarios, we could reliably retrieve the expected patterns.
Related papers
- A Methodology for Selecting and Composing Runtime Architecture Patterns for Production LLM Agents [0.0]
This paper names that boundary thedeterministic boundary (SDB): a four-part contract among a proposer, verifier, commit step, and reject signal.<n>We argue that the SDB is the load-bearing primitive of production agent runtimes.<n>We present a catalog of six runtime patterns that compose the SDB differently across conversational, autonomous, and long-horizon agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-19T17:54:21Z) - UniT: Unified Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Test-time Scaling [85.590774707406]
Unified models can handle both multimodal understanding and generation within a single architecture, yet they typically operate in a single pass without iteratively refining their outputs.<n>We introduce UniT, a framework for multimodal test-time scaling that enables a single unified model to reason, verify, and refine across multiple rounds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T18:59:49Z) - Do We Need Asynchronous SGD? On the Near-Optimality of Synchronous Methods [59.72933231179977]
We revisit Synchronous SGD and its robust variant, called $m$-Synchronous SGD, and theoretically show that they are nearly optimal in many heterogeneous computation scenarios.<n>While synchronous methods are not universal solutions and there exist tasks where asynchronous methods may be necessary, we show that they are sufficient for many modern heterogeneous computation scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T18:02:14Z) - Causal Structure Learning in Hawkes Processes with Complex Latent Confounder Networks [23.669083610595838]
We show that continuous-time event sequences can be represented by a discrete-time causal model as the time interval shrinks.<n>We propose a two-phase iterative algorithm that alternates between inferring causal relationships among discovered subprocesses and uncovering new latent subprocesses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-15T09:03:39Z) - The WHY in Business Processes: Unification of Causal Process Models [2.0811729303868005]
Causal reasoning is essential for business process interventions and improvement.<n>We propose a novel method to unify multiple causal process variants into a consistent model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T21:12:30Z) - Object-Centric Conformance Alignments with Synchronization (Extended Version) [57.76661079749309]
We present a new formalism that combines the ability of object-centric Petri nets to capture one-to-many relations and the one of Petri nets with identifiers to compare and synchronize objects based on their identity.
We propose a conformance checking approach for such nets based on an encoding in satisfiability modulo theories (SMT)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-13T21:53:32Z) - Anomaly Detection via Learning-Based Sequential Controlled Sensing [25.282033825977827]
We address the problem of detecting anomalies among a set of binary processes via learning-based controlled sensing.
To identify the anomalies, the decision-making agent is allowed to observe a subset of the processes at each time instant.
Our objective is to design a sequential selection policy that dynamically determines which processes to observe at each time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-30T07:49:33Z) - The WHY in Business Processes: Discovery of Causal Execution Dependencies [2.0811729303868005]
Unraveling causal relationships among the execution of process activities is a crucial element in predicting the consequences of process interventions.<n>This work offers a systematic approach to the unveiling of the causal business process by leveraging an existing causal discovery algorithm over activity timing.<n>Our methodology searches for such discrepancies between the two models in the context of three causal patterns, and derives a new view in which these inconsistencies are annotated over the mined process model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T14:23:15Z) - Towards Robust and Adaptive Motion Forecasting: A Causal Representation
Perspective [72.55093886515824]
We introduce a causal formalism of motion forecasting, which casts the problem as a dynamic process with three groups of latent variables.
We devise a modular architecture that factorizes the representations of invariant mechanisms and style confounders to approximate a causal graph.
Experiment results on synthetic and real datasets show that our three proposed components significantly improve the robustness and reusability of the learned motion representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-29T18:59:09Z) - An Empirical Study: Extensive Deep Temporal Point Process [61.14164208094238]
We first review recent research emphasis and difficulties in modeling asynchronous event sequences with deep temporal point process.<n>We propose a Granger causality discovery framework for exploiting the relations among multi-types of events.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-19T10:15:00Z) - Adversarial Robustness Verification and Attack Synthesis in Stochastic
Systems [8.833548357664606]
We develop a formal framework for adversarial robustness in systems defined as discrete time Markov chains (DTMCs)
We outline a class of threat models under which adversaries can perturb system transitions, constrained by an $varepsilon$ ball around the original transition probabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-05T15:52:47Z) - Attentional Prototype Inference for Few-Shot Segmentation [128.45753577331422]
We propose attentional prototype inference (API), a probabilistic latent variable framework for few-shot segmentation.
We define a global latent variable to represent the prototype of each object category, which we model as a probabilistic distribution.
We conduct extensive experiments on four benchmarks, where our proposal obtains at least competitive and often better performance than state-of-the-art prototype-based methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-14T06:58:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.