Fusing Driver Perceived and Physical Risk for Safety Critical Scenario Screening in Autonomous Driving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20232v1
• Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2026 13:24:23 GMT
• Title: Fusing Driver Perceived and Physical Risk for Safety Critical Scenario Screening in Autonomous Driving
• Abstract summary: We propose a driver risk fusion based hazardous scenario screening method for autonomous driving.<n>During training, the method combines an improved Driver Risk Field with a dynamic cost model to generate high quality risk supervision signals.<n>During inference it directly predicts scenario level risk scores through fast forward passes, avoiding per frame risk computation.
• Score: 20.663269212781426
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous driving testing increasingly relies on mining safety critical scenarios from large scale naturalistic driving data, yet existing screening pipelines still depend on manual risk annotation and expensive frame by frame risk evaluation, resulting in low efficiency and weakly grounded risk quantification. To address this issue, we propose a driver risk fusion based hazardous scenario screening method for autonomous driving. During training, the method combines an improved Driver Risk Field with a dynamic cost model to generate high quality risk supervision signals, while during inference it directly predicts scenario level risk scores through fast forward passes, avoiding per frame risk computation and enabling efficient large scale ranking and retrieval. The improved Driver Risk Field introduces a new risk height function and a speed adaptive look ahead mechanism, and the dynamic cost model integrates kinetic energy, oriented bounding box constraints, and Gaussian kernel diffusion smoothing for more accurate interaction modeling. We further design a risk trajectory cross attention decoder to jointly decode risk and trajectories. Experiments on the INTERACTION and FLUID datasets show that the proposed method produces smoother and more discriminative risk estimates. On FLUID, it achieves an AUC of 0.792 and an AP of 0.825, outperforming PODAR by 9.1 percent and 5.1 percent, respectively, demonstrating its effectiveness for scalable risk labeling and hazardous scenario screening.

Related papers

• Data-Driven Risk Fields for Safer End-to-End Autonomous Driving [25.328788313918977]
  We propose DRiF, a data-driven risk-field framework for safer autonomous driving.<n>DRiF learns a shared BEV feature with static map segmentation, dynamic risk prediction, and vehicle planning.<n>Experiments on Bench2Drive show DRiF achieves competitive overall performance, with consistent improvements in driving score, success rate, and collision-related metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T16:05:17Z)
• Comparison-Based Ordinal Learning for Proactive Driving Risk Assessment [18.28137177820341]
  This paper proposes a comparison-based ordinal risk learning framework that learns collision-relevant risk scores from pairwise supervision in driving data.<n>Results show that the proposed framework improves high-recall risk discrimination, warning precision, and warning lead time over representative surrogate-based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-13T06:05:17Z)
• Risk-Aware World Model Predictive Control for Generalizable End-to-End Autonomous Driving [82.69496624372944]
  "Only driving like the expert" suffers from limited generalization.<n>Can an E2E-AD system make reliable decisions without any expert action supervision?<n>We propose a unified framework named Risk-aware World Model Predictive Control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T17:32:30Z)
• Conformal Thinking: Risk Control for Reasoning on a Compute Budget [60.65072883773352]
  Reasoning Large Language Models (LLMs) enable test-time scaling, with dataset-level accuracy improving as the token budget increases.<n>We re-frame the budget setting problem as risk control, limiting the error rate while minimizing compute.<n>Our framework introduces an upper threshold that stops reasoning when the model is confident and a novel lower threshold that preemptively stops unsolvable instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T18:17:22Z)
• Constrained Language Model Policy Optimization via Risk-aware Stepwise Alignment [49.2305683068875]
  We propose Risk-aware Stepwise Alignment (RSA), a novel alignment method that incorporates risk awareness into the policy optimization process.<n> RSA mitigates risks induced by excessive model shift away from a reference policy, and it explicitly suppresses low-probability yet high-impact harmful behaviors.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves high levels of helpfulness while ensuring strong safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T14:38:02Z)
• STRAP: Spatial-Temporal Risk-Attentive Vehicle Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Driving [0.968535561940627]
  We propose a novel spatial-temporal risk-attentive trajectory prediction framework that incorporates a risk potential field.<n>The proposed framework provides interpretable, risk-aware predictions, contributing to more robust decision-making for autonomous driving systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T13:05:35Z)
• Learning Risk-Aware Quadrupedal Locomotion using Distributional Reinforcement Learning [12.156082576280955]
  Deployment in hazardous environments requires robots to understand the risks associated with their actions and movements to prevent accidents. We propose a risk sensitive locomotion training method employing distributional reinforcement learning to consider safety explicitly. We show emergent risk sensitive locomotion behavior in simulation and on the quadrupedal robot ANYmal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T16:05:32Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• Efficient Risk-Averse Reinforcement Learning [79.61412643761034]
  In risk-averse reinforcement learning (RL), the goal is to optimize some risk measure of the returns. We prove that under certain conditions this inevitably leads to a local-optimum barrier, and propose a soft risk mechanism to bypass it. We demonstrate improved risk aversion in maze navigation, autonomous driving, and resource allocation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-10T19:40:52Z)
• Automatic Risk Adaptation in Distributional Reinforcement Learning [26.113528145137497]
  The use of Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents in practical applications requires the consideration of suboptimal outcomes. This is especially important in safety-critical environments, where errors can lead to high costs or damage. We show reduced failure rates by up to a factor of 7 and improved generalization performance by up to 14% compared to both risk-aware and risk-agnostic agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T11:31:04Z)
• Risk-Sensitive Sequential Action Control with Multi-Modal Human Trajectory Forecasting for Safe Crowd-Robot Interaction [55.569050872780224]
  We present an online framework for safe crowd-robot interaction based on risk-sensitive optimal control, wherein the risk is modeled by the entropic risk measure. Our modular approach decouples the crowd-robot interaction into learning-based prediction and model-based control. A simulation study and a real-world experiment show that the proposed framework can accomplish safe and efficient navigation while avoiding collisions with more than 50 humans in the scene.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T02:02:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.