Decorrelation, Diversity, and Emergent Intelligence: The Isomorphism Between Social Insect Colonies and Ensemble Machine Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20328v2
• Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:17:15 GMT
• Title: Decorrelation, Diversity, and Emergent Intelligence: The Isomorphism Between Social Insect Colonies and Ensemble Machine Learning
• Abstract summary: Social insect colonies and ensemble machine learning methods represent two of the most successful examples of decentralized information processing in nature and computation respectively.<n>We develop a rigorous framework demonstrating that ant colony decision-making and random forest learning are emergent under a common formalism of textbfstochastic ensemble intelligence.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Social insect colonies and ensemble machine learning methods represent two of the most successful examples of decentralized information processing in nature and computation respectively. Here we develop a rigorous mathematical framework demonstrating that ant colony decision-making and random forest learning are isomorphic under a common formalism of \textbf{stochastic ensemble intelligence}. We show that the mechanisms by which genetically identical ants achieve functional differentiation -- through stochastic response to local cues and positive feedback -- map precisely onto the bootstrap aggregation and random feature subsampling that decorrelate decision trees. Using tools from Bayesian inference, multi-armed bandit theory, and statistical learning theory, we prove that both systems implement identical variance reduction strategies through decorrelation of identical units. We derive explicit mappings between ant recruitment rates and tree weightings, pheromone trail reinforcement and out-of-bag error estimation, and quorum sensing and prediction averaging. This isomorphism suggests that collective intelligence, whether biological or artificial, emerges from a universal principle: \textbf{randomized identical agents + diversity-enforcing mechanisms $\rightarrow$ emergent optimality}.

Related papers

• Joint Causal Structure and Cluster Discovery Using Variational Inference [12.348487219726865]
  Causal discovery aims to understand the relationships between individual random variables.<n>Existing methods assume that knowledge of such groups or clusters is explicitly available when modeling interactions.<n>We present a novel approach based on variational inference to simultaneously infer both the latent clusters and causal structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-23T04:32:36Z)
• Isomorphic Functionalities between Ant Colony and Ensemble Learning: Part II-On the Strength of Weak Learnability and the Boosting Paradigm [0.0]
  In Part I of this series, we established a rigorous mathematical isomorphism between ant colony decision-making and random forest learning.<n>Here we turn to the complementary mechanism: bias reduction through adaptive weighting.<n>We prove that these processes are mathematically isomorphic, establishing that the fundamental theorem of weak learnability has a direct analog in colony decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T03:04:21Z)
• The Minary Primitive of Computational Autopoiesis [0.0]
  We introduce Minary, a computational framework designed as a candidate for the first formally provable autopoietic primitive.<n>We derive exact formulas for the mean and variance of the normalized consensus conditioned on the activation of a given semantic dimension.<n>We argue that Minary is organizationally closed yet operationally open in the sense of Maturana and Varela.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T02:12:04Z)
• Indiscriminate Disruption of Conditional Inference on Multivariate Gaussians [60.22542847840578]
  Despite advances in adversarial machine learning, inference for Gaussian models in the presence of an adversary is notably understudied. We consider a self-interested attacker who wishes to disrupt a decisionmaker's conditional inference and subsequent actions by corrupting a set of evidentiary variables. To avoid detection, the attacker also desires the attack to appear plausible wherein plausibility is determined by the density of the corrupted evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T17:46:55Z)
• The Hive Mind is a Single Reinforcement Learning Agent [7.794211366198159]
  This paper draws from the well-established collective decision-making model of nest-hunting in swarms of honey bees.<n>We show that the emergent distributed cognition (sometimes referred to as the $textithive mind$) arising from individual bees following simple, local imitation-based rules is that of a single online reinforcement learning (RL) agent.<n>Our analysis implies that a group of cognition-limited organisms can be equivalent to a more complex, reinforcement-enabled entity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T02:49:37Z)
• Evaluating the Robustness of Interpretability Methods through Explanation Invariance and Equivariance [72.50214227616728]
  Interpretability methods are valuable only if their explanations faithfully describe the explained model. We consider neural networks whose predictions are invariant under a specific symmetry group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-13T17:59:03Z)
• Counting Like Human: Anthropoid Crowd Counting on Modeling the Similarity of Objects [92.80955339180119]
  mainstream crowd counting methods regress density map and integrate it to obtain counting results. Inspired by this, we propose a rational and anthropoid crowd counting framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-02T07:00:53Z)
• Equivariant Representation Learning via Class-Pose Decomposition [17.032782230538388]
  We introduce a general method for learning representations that are equivariant to symmetries of data. The components semantically correspond to intrinsic data classes and poses respectively. Results show that our representations capture the geometry of data and outperform other equivariant representation learning frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T06:55:52Z)
• Causal Discovery in Heterogeneous Environments Under the Sparse Mechanism Shift Hypothesis [7.895866278697778]
  Machine learning approaches commonly rely on the assumption of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data. In reality, this assumption is almost always violated due to distribution shifts between environments. We propose the Mechanism Shift Score (MSS), a score-based approach amenable to various empirical estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T15:39:30Z)
• Intersection Regularization for Extracting Semantic Attributes [72.53481390411173]
  We consider the problem of supervised classification, such that the features that the network extracts match an unseen set of semantic attributes. For example, when learning to classify images of birds into species, we would like to observe the emergence of features that zoologists use to classify birds. We propose training a neural network with discrete top-level activations, which is followed by a multi-layered perceptron (MLP) and a parallel decision tree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-22T14:32:44Z)
• General stochastic separation theorems with optimal bounds [68.8204255655161]
  Phenomenon of separability was revealed and used in machine learning to correct errors of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems and analyze AI instabilities. Errors or clusters of errors can be separated from the rest of the data. The ability to correct an AI system also opens up the possibility of an attack on it, and the high dimensionality induces vulnerabilities caused by the same separability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-11T13:12:41Z)
• Learning from Aggregate Observations [82.44304647051243]
  We study the problem of learning from aggregate observations where supervision signals are given to sets of instances. We present a general probabilistic framework that accommodates a variety of aggregate observations. Simple maximum likelihood solutions can be applied to various differentiable models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-14T06:18:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.