Towards an AI Buddy for every University Student? Exploring Students' Experiences, Attitudes and Motivations towards AI and AI-based Study Companions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20909v1
• Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 18:44:41 GMT
• Title: Towards an AI Buddy for every University Student? Exploring Students' Experiences, Attitudes and Motivations towards AI and AI-based Study Companions
• Abstract summary: This study investigates students' prior experiences with AI tools, their perceived digital and AI-related competences, and their interest in emerging technologies.<n>Based on a survey of 926 students at a Swiss university, students revealed widespread prior use of AI, primarily for text-based and productivity tasks, with moderate self-assessed digital competence.<n>Students expressed strong enthusiasm for adopting an AI Buddy, valuing its potential for time efficiency, personalized academic support, and study organization, but expressed significant concerns about data privacy and over-reliance.
• Score: 4.16108684206315
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite the widespread integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools in higher education, there is limited empirical insight into students' experiences, competences, and readiness to adopt personalized AI companions. To address this gap, this study investigates three key questions: (RQ1) What are students' prior experiences with AI tools, their perceived digital and AI-related competences, and their interest in emerging technologies?; (RQ2) How do students perceive a hypothetical "AI Buddy" (a digital companion designed to support students throughout their academic journey) including adoption, benefits, and concerns?; (RQ3) How does students' willingness to adopt an AI Buddy relate to motivations for engaging in traditional academic activities? Based on a survey of 926 students at a Swiss university, students revealed widespread prior use of AI, primarily for text-based and productivity tasks, with moderate self-assessed digital competence. Students expressed strong enthusiasm for adopting an AI Buddy, valuing its potential for time efficiency, personalized academic support, and study organization, but expressed significant concerns about data privacy and over-reliance. A weak negative correlation emerged between AI Buddy adoption willingness and motivations for attending lectures or using library resources, while social and collaborative motivations remained unaffected. These findings suggest that AI Buddies may partially replace information-seeking behaviours but preserve the social fabric of university life. This study provides practical recommendations including the need for robust privacy protections and critical engagement strategies to ensure AI Buddies enhance, rather than undermine, the academic and communal value of higher education.

Related papers

• Beyond Detection: Redesigning Assessment and Governande of Generative AI at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) [39.92037610044293]
  Most institutions frame the debate around AI detection, plagiarism, academic integrity and a presumed drop in student effort as defensive.<n>Other group of pioneering universities is pursuing deeper adoption, and assuming that any policy built on prevention or sanction will not hold.<n>What universities need instead is a coordinated effort to set clear, course-by-course rules for GenAI use.<n>UPM is developing a strategic and sustainable AI policy and adoption framework structured around six dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T18:04:50Z)
• AI Literacy, Safety Awareness, and STEM Career Aspirations of Australian Secondary Students: Evaluating the Impact of Workshop Interventions [38.350232667249095]
  Deepfakes and other forms of synthetic media pose growing safety risks for adolescents.<n>This study evaluates the impact of Day of AI Australia's workshop-based intervention on Australian secondary students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T02:55:53Z)
• Do Students Rely on AI? Analysis of Student-ChatGPT Conversations from a Field Study [10.71612026319996]
  This study analyzed 315 student-AI conversations during a brief, quiz-based scenario across various STEM courses.<n>Students exhibited overall low reliance on AI and many of them could not effectively use AI for learning.<n>Certain behavioral metrics strongly predicted AI reliance, highlighting potential behavioral mechanisms to explain AI adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T20:00:27Z)
• Evaluating AI-Powered Learning Assistants in Engineering Higher Education: Student Engagement, Ethical Challenges, and Policy Implications [0.2099922236065961]
  This study evaluates the Educational AI Hub, an AI-powered learning framework, implemented in undergraduate civil and environmental engineering courses at a large R1 public university.<n>Students valued the AI assistant for its accessibility and comfort, with nearly half reporting greater ease using it than seeking help from instructors or teaching assistants.<n>Ethical uncertainty, particularly around institutional policy and academic integrity, emerged as a key barrier to full engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T03:02:49Z)
• Student Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of AI in Education [0.49157446832511503]
  The use of chatbots equipped with artificial intelligence (AI) in educational settings has increased in recent years.<n>The adoption of these technologies has raised concerns about their impact on academic integrity, students' ability to problem-solve independently, and potential underlying biases.<n>To better understand students' perspectives and experiences with these tools, a survey was conducted at a large public university in the United States.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-04T17:36:11Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Sports: Insights from a Quantitative Survey among Sports Students in Germany about their Perceptions, Expectations, and Concerns regarding the Use of AI Tools [0.0]
  The manuscript presents findings from a quantitative survey conducted among sports students of all semesters in Germany.<n>Students express confidence that the proliferation of AI will not compromise their critical thinking skills.<n>Students have concerns about plagiarism, lecturer preparedness and their own skills and future skill development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T05:37:53Z)
• Let people fail! Exploring the influence of explainable virtual and robotic agents in learning-by-doing tasks [45.23431596135002]
  This study compares the effects of classic vs. partner-aware explanations on human behavior and performance during a learning-by-doing task. Results indicated that partner-aware explanations influenced participants differently based on the type of artificial agents involved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T13:22:04Z)
• I would love this to be like an assistant, not the teacher: a voice of the customer perspective of what distance learning students want from an Artificial Intelligence Digital Assistant [0.0]
  This study examined the perceptions of ten online and distance learning students regarding the design of a hypothetical AI Digital Assistant (AIDA) All participants agreed on the usefulness of such an AI tool while studying and reported benefits from using it for real-time assistance and query resolution, support for academic tasks, personalisation and accessibility, together with emotional and social support. Students' concerns related to the ethical and social implications of implementing AIDA, data privacy and data use, operational challenges, academic integrity and misuse, and the future of education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T08:10:41Z)
• Charting the Future of AI in Project-Based Learning: A Co-Design Exploration with Students [35.05435052195561]
  The increasing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by students in learning presents new challenges for assessing their learning outcomes. This paper introduces a co-design study to explore the potential of students' AI usage data as a novel material for assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T14:49:29Z)
• Learning to Prompt in the Classroom to Understand AI Limits: A pilot study [35.06607166918901]
  Large Language Models (LLM) and the derived chatbots, like ChatGPT, have highly improved the natural language processing capabilities of AI systems. However, excitement has led to negative sentiments, even as AI methods demonstrate remarkable contributions. A pilot educational intervention was performed in a high school with 21 students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T07:51:37Z)
• AGI: Artificial General Intelligence for Education [41.45039606933712]
  This position paper reviews artificial general intelligence (AGI)'s key concepts, capabilities, scope, and potential within future education. It highlights that AGI can significantly improve intelligent tutoring systems, educational assessment, and evaluation procedures. The paper emphasizes that AGI's capabilities extend to understanding human emotions and social interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T22:31:59Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.