Beyond Detection: Redesigning Assessment and Governande of Generative AI at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01255v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 18:04:50 GMT
• Title: Beyond Detection: Redesigning Assessment and Governande of Generative AI at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)
• Abstract summary: Most institutions frame the debate around AI detection, plagiarism, academic integrity and a presumed drop in student effort as defensive.<n>Other group of pioneering universities is pursuing deeper adoption, and assuming that any policy built on prevention or sanction will not hold.<n>What universities need instead is a coordinated effort to set clear, course-by-course rules for GenAI use.<n>UPM is developing a strategic and sustainable AI policy and adoption framework structured around six dimensions.
• Score: 39.92037610044293
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Universities have responded to generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in noticeably different ways, both internationally and within Spain. So far, the dominant reaction has been defensive, this is, most institutions frame the debate around AI detection, plagiarism, academic integrity and a presumed drop in student effort, prioritizing basic training for academic staff over students. Other group of pioneering universities is doing the opposite, pursuing deeper adoption, and assuming that any policy built on prevention or sanction will not hold. This paper sides with that second view. Obsessing about detection is a dead end, since generated text is increasingly hard to distinguish from human writing, and detectors still misfire too often to be trusted. What universities need instead is a coordinated effort to set clear, course-by-course rules for GenAI use, redesign assessment toward authentic and interdisciplinary assessment that fosters critical thinking and learner autonomy, and build a serious AI-literacy programme that treats students as critical co-creators rather than passive users. The challenge, though, is not only pedagogical. Adoption at university scale also raises organisational, technical, operational, legal and economic questions that have to be solved together. In this context, the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) is developing a strategic and sustainable AI policy and adoption framework structured around six dimensions, in which AI functions as an enabler of student autonomy and pedagogical innovation rather than as a threat to be policed.

Related papers

• Reshaping Undergraduate Computer Science Education in the Generative AI Era [85.78707817763434]
  Generative AI represents a turning point for Computer Science (CS) education.<n>To keep pace with advances in AI technology, CS curricula should consider a shift toward understanding and verifying AI-generated artifacts.<n>We believe that to effectively prepare future computer science graduates, capable of creating, solving problems, and managing, as well as co-creating, artifacts with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T05:26:24Z)
• Group-Differentiated Discourse on Generative AI in High School Education: A Case Study of Reddit Communities [12.603101932945995]
  We study how different Reddit communities discuss generative AI in high school education.<n>Using 3,789 posts from five education-related subreddits, we compare student, teacher, and mixed communities.<n>Teachers are more likely to articulate explicit pedagogical trade-offs, simultaneously framing AI as both beneficial and harmful for learning.<n>Students more often discuss AI tactically in relation to accusations, grades, and enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T03:06:21Z)
• "Everyone's using it, but no one is allowed to talk about it": College Students' Experiences Navigating the Higher Education Environment in a Generative AI World [13.109430455513882]
  Findings show that institutional pressure factors like deadlines, exam cycles, and grading lead students to engage with AI even when they think it undermines their learning.<n>Current institutional AI policies are perceived as generic, inconsistent, and confusing, resulting in routine noncompliance.<n>Students develop value-based self-regulation strategies, but environmental pressures create a gap between students' intentions and their behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T19:00:28Z)
• Who Owns the Knowledge? Copyright, GenAI, and the Future of Academic Publishing [0.0]
  The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs) into scientific research and higher education presents a paradigm shift.<n>This study examines the complex intersection of AI and science, with a specific focus on the challenges posed to copyright law and the principles of open science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T10:34:38Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control [44.99833362998488]
  The use of Artificial Intelligence in public administration is expanding rapidly.<n>While AI promises greater efficiency and responsiveness, its integration into government functions raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability.<n>This article applies principal-agent theory to AI adoption as a special case of delegation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T07:46:41Z)
• Auto-assessment of assessment: A conceptual framework towards fulfilling the policy gaps in academic assessment practices [4.770873744131964]
  We surveyed 117 academics from three countries (UK, UAE, and Iraq) We identified that most academics retain positive opinions regarding AI in education. For the first time, we propose a novel AI framework for autonomously evaluating students' work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T15:22:37Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Is AI Changing the Rules of Academic Misconduct? An In-depth Look at Students' Perceptions of 'AI-giarism' [0.0]
  This study explores students' perceptions of AI-giarism, an emergent form of academic dishonesty involving AI and plagiarism. The findings portray a complex landscape of understanding, with clear disapproval for direct AI content generation. The study provides pivotal insights for academia, policy-making, and the broader integration of AI technology in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T02:22:08Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.