Deterministic Hallucination Detection in Medical VQA via Confidence-Evidence Bayesian Gain

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21693v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:29:53 GMT
• Title: Deterministic Hallucination Detection in Medical VQA via Confidence-Evidence Bayesian Gain
• Abstract summary: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for medical Visual Question Answering (VQA)<n>They remain prone to hallucinations, defined as generating responses that contradict the input image, posing serious risks in clinical settings.<n>Current hallucination detection methods, such as Semantic Entropy (SE) and Vision-Amplified Semantic Entropy (VASE), require 10 to 20 generations per sample together with an external natural language inference model for semantic clustering, making them expensive and difficult to deploy in practice.<n>We propose a deterministic detection method that requires no sampling, no external models, and no task-
• Score: 6.272224314406867
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for medical Visual Question Answering (VQA), yet they remain prone to hallucinations, defined as generating responses that contradict the input image, posing serious risks in clinical settings. Current hallucination detection methods, such as Semantic Entropy (SE) and Vision-Amplified Semantic Entropy (VASE), require 10 to 20 stochastic generations per sample together with an external natural language inference model for semantic clustering, making them computationally expensive and difficult to deploy in practice. We observe that hallucinated responses exhibit a distinctive signature directly in the model's own log-probabilities: inconsistent token-level confidence and weak sensitivity to visual evidence. Based on this observation, we propose Confidence-Evidence Bayesian Gain (CEBaG), a deterministic hallucination detection method that requires no stochastic sampling, no external models, and no task-specific hyperparameters. CEBaG combines two complementary signals: token-level predictive variance, which captures inconsistent confidence across response tokens, and evidence magnitude, which measures how much the image shifts per-token predictions relative to text-only inference. Evaluated across four medical MLLMs and three VQA benchmarks (16 experimental settings), CEBaG achieves the highest AUC in 13 of 16 settings and improves over VASE by 8 AUC points on average, while being fully deterministic and self-contained. The code will be made available upon acceptance.

Related papers

• VIHD: Visual Intervention-based Hallucination Detection for Medical Visual Question Answering [27.827862126990553]
  Hallucinations pose risks to clinical decision-making and necessitate effective detection.<n>Existing introspective detection methods primarily perform uncertainty estimation or logical verification.<n>We propose VIHD, a Visual Intervention-based Hallucination Detection method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T06:14:45Z)
• VCE: A zero-cost hallucination mitigation method of LVLMs via visual contrastive editing [70.82867621856968]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) frequently suffer from Object Hallucination (OH)<n>Recent studies suggest that the hallucination problem may stem from language priors.<n>We propose Visual Contrastive Editing (VCE), a novel post-hoc method that identifies and suppresses hallucinatory tendencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T12:40:07Z)
• Neural Uncertainty Principle: A Unified View of Adversarial Fragility and LLM Hallucination [60.197429875410286]
  Adversarial vulnerability in vision and hallucination in large language models are conventionally viewed as separate problems.<n>Formalizing a Neural Uncertainty Principle (NUP) under a loss-induced state, we find that in near-bound regimes, further compression must be accompanied by increased sensitivity dispersion.<n>In vision, masking highly coupled components improves robustness without costly adversarial training.<n>In language, the same prefill-stage probe detects hallucination risk before generating any answer tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T02:07:10Z)
• FaithSCAN: Model-Driven Single-Pass Hallucination Detection for Faithful Visual Question Answering [14.550872089352943]
  FaithSCAN is a lightweight network that detects hallucinations by exploiting rich internal signals of vision-language models.<n>We extend the LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm to VQA hallucination and propose a low-cost strategy to automatically generate model-dependent supervision signals.<n>In-depth analysis shows hallucinations arise from systematic internal state variations in visual perception, cross-modal reasoning, and language decoding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-01T09:19:39Z)
• Semantic Energy: Detecting LLM Hallucination Beyond Entropy [106.92072182161712]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly deployed in real-world applications, but they remain susceptible to hallucinations.<n>Uncertainty estimation is a feasible approach to detect such hallucinations.<n>We introduce Semantic Energy, a novel uncertainty estimation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T07:33:50Z)
• SHALE: A Scalable Benchmark for Fine-grained Hallucination Evaluation in LVLMs [52.03164192840023]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) still suffer from hallucinations, i.e., generating content inconsistent with input or established world knowledge.<n>We propose an automated data construction pipeline that produces scalable, controllable, and diverse evaluation data.<n>We construct SHALE, a benchmark designed to assess both faithfulness and factuality hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T07:58:01Z)
• Detecting Token-Level Hallucinations Using Variance Signals: A Reference-Free Approach [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive generative capabilities across diverse tasks but remain susceptible to hallucinations.<n>We introduce a reference-free, token-level hallucination detection framework that leverages the variance in token log-probabilities across multiple generations.<n>Our approach is model-agnostic, interpretable, and suited for real-time or post-hoc analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-05T19:20:59Z)
• RePPL: Recalibrating Perplexity by Uncertainty in Semantic Propagation and Language Generation for Explainable QA Hallucination Detection [26.186204911845866]
  hallucinations remain a vital obstacle to large language models' trustworthy use.<n>We propose RePPL to recalibrate uncertainty measurement by these two aspects.<n>Our method achieves the best comprehensive detection performance across various QA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T11:23:05Z)
• Vision-Amplified Semantic Entropy for Hallucination Detection in Medical Visual Question Answering [42.116697933322875]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in medical Visual Question Answering (VQA)<n>They remain prone to hallucinations-incorrect responses that contradict input images, posing substantial risks in clinical decision-making.<n>Current hallucination detection methods, especially semantic entropy (SE), have demonstrated promising hallucination detection capacity for LLMs.<n>We propose Vision Amplified Semantic Entropy (VASE), which incorporates weak image transformations and amplifies the impact of visual input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T12:45:34Z)
• REAL Sampling: Boosting Factuality and Diversity of Open-Ended Generation via Asymptotic Entropy [93.8400683020273]
  Decoding methods for large language models (LLMs) usually struggle with the tradeoff between ensuring factuality and maintaining diversity. We propose REAL sampling, a decoding method that improved factuality and diversity over nucleus sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T21:44:49Z)
• To Believe or Not to Believe Your LLM [51.2579827761899]
  We explore uncertainty quantification in large language models (LLMs) We derive an information-theoretic metric that allows to reliably detect when only epistemic uncertainty is large. We conduct a series of experiments which demonstrate the advantage of our formulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T17:58:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.