FaithSCAN: Model-Driven Single-Pass Hallucination Detection for Faithful Visual Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00269v1
• Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2026 09:19:39 GMT
• Title: FaithSCAN: Model-Driven Single-Pass Hallucination Detection for Faithful Visual Question Answering
• Authors: Chaodong Tong, Qi Zhang, Chen Li, Lei Jiang, Yanbing Liu,
• Abstract summary: FaithSCAN is a lightweight network that detects hallucinations by exploiting rich internal signals of vision-language models.<n>We extend the LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm to VQA hallucination and propose a low-cost strategy to automatically generate model-dependent supervision signals.<n>In-depth analysis shows hallucinations arise from systematic internal state variations in visual perception, cross-modal reasoning, and language decoding.
• Score: 14.550872089352943
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Faithfulness hallucinations in VQA occur when vision-language models produce fluent yet visually ungrounded answers, severely undermining their reliability in safety-critical applications. Existing detection methods mainly fall into two categories: external verification approaches relying on auxiliary models or knowledge bases, and uncertainty-driven approaches using repeated sampling or uncertainty estimates. The former suffer from high computational overhead and are limited by external resource quality, while the latter capture only limited facets of model uncertainty and fail to sufficiently explore the rich internal signals associated with the diverse failure modes. Both paradigms thus have inherent limitations in efficiency, robustness, and detection performance. To address these challenges, we propose FaithSCAN: a lightweight network that detects hallucinations by exploiting rich internal signals of VLMs, including token-level decoding uncertainty, intermediate visual representations, and cross-modal alignment features. These signals are fused via branch-wise evidence encoding and uncertainty-aware attention. We also extend the LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm to VQA hallucination and propose a low-cost strategy to automatically generate model-dependent supervision signals, enabling supervised training without costly human labels while maintaining high detection accuracy. Experiments on multiple VQA benchmarks show that FaithSCAN significantly outperforms existing methods in both effectiveness and efficiency. In-depth analysis shows hallucinations arise from systematic internal state variations in visual perception, cross-modal reasoning, and language decoding. Different internal signals provide complementary diagnostic cues, and hallucination patterns vary across VLM architectures, offering new insights into the underlying causes of multimodal hallucinations.

Related papers

• PromptCD: Test-Time Behavior Enhancement via Polarity-Prompt Contrastive Decoding [85.22047087898311]
  We introduce Polarity-Prompt Contrastive Decoding (PromptCD), a test-time behavior control method that generalizes contrastive decoding to broader enhancement settings.<n>PromptCD constructs paired positive and negative guiding prompts for a target behavior and contrasts model responses to reinforce desirable outcomes.<n>Experiments on the "3H" alignment objectives demonstrate consistent and substantial improvements, indicating that post-trained models can achieve meaningful self-enhancement purely at test time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T08:56:52Z)
• Hallucination Begins Where Saliency Drops [18.189047289404325]
  hallucinations frequently arise when preceding output tokens exhibit low saliency toward the prediction of the next token.<n>We introduce LVLMs-Saliency, a gradient-aware diagnostic framework that quantifies the visual grounding strength of each output token.<n>Our method significantly reduces hallucination rates while preserving fluency and task performance, offering a robust and interpretable solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T05:50:52Z)
• Agentic Uncertainty Quantification [76.94013626702183]
  We propose a unified Dual-Process Agentic UQ (AUQ) framework that transforms verbalized uncertainty into active, bi-directional control signals.<n>Our architecture comprises two complementary mechanisms: System 1 (Uncertainty-Aware Memory, UAM), which implicitly propagates verbalized confidence and semantic explanations to prevent blind decision-making; and System 2 (Uncertainty-Aware Reflection, UAR), which utilizes these explanations as rational cues to trigger targeted inference-time resolution only when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T07:16:26Z)
• Vision-Language Introspection: Mitigating Overconfident Hallucinations in MLLMs via Interpretable Bi-Causal Steering [33.3588824921581]
  We introduce Vision-Language Introspection (VLI), a training-free inference framework that simulates a metacognitive self-correction process.<n>VLI achieves state-of-the-art performance on advanced models, reducing object hallucination rates by 12.67% on MMHal-Bench and improving accuracy by 5.8% on POPE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T17:49:13Z)
• HaluNet: Multi-Granular Uncertainty Modeling for Efficient Hallucination Detection in LLM Question Answering [12.183015986299438]
  We present textbfHaluNet, a lightweight and trainable neural framework that integrates multi granular token level uncertainties.<n> Experiments on SQuAD, TriviaQA, and Natural Questions show that HaluNet delivers strong detection performance and favorable computational efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-31T02:03:10Z)
• Revealing Perception and Generation Dynamics in LVLMs: Mitigating Hallucinations via Validated Dominance Correction [59.801614364841775]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities, yet hallucinations remain a persistent challenge.<n>This work presents a systematic analysis of the internal evolution of visual perception and token generation in LVLMs.<n>We devise the VDC (d Dominance Correction) strategy, which detects unsupported tokens and replaces them with validated ones to improve output reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T17:05:42Z)
• VOGUE: Guiding Exploration with Visual Uncertainty Improves Multimodal Reasoning [62.09195763860549]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves reasoning in large language models (LLMs) but struggles with exploration.<n>We introduce $textbfVOGUE (Visual Uncertainty Guided Exploration)$, a novel method that shifts exploration from the output (text) to the input (visual) space.<n>Our work shows that grounding exploration in the inherent uncertainty of visual inputs is an effective strategy for improving multimodal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T20:32:08Z)
• LLM Hallucination Detection: A Fast Fourier Transform Method Based on Hidden Layer Temporal Signals [10.85580316542761]
  Hallucination remains a critical barrier for deploying large language models (LLMs) in reliability-sensitive applications.<n>We propose HSAD (Hidden Signal Analysis-based Detection), a novel hallucination detection framework that models the temporal dynamics of hidden representations.<n>Across multiple benchmarks, including TruthfulQA, HSAD achieves over 10 percentage points improvement compared to prior state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T15:08:19Z)
• ICR Probe: Tracking Hidden State Dynamics for Reliable Hallucination Detection in LLMs [50.18087419133284]
  hallucination detection methods leveraging hidden states predominantly focus on static and isolated representations.<n>We introduce a novel metric, the ICR Score, which quantifies the contribution of modules to the hidden states' update.<n>We propose a hallucination detection method, the ICR Probe, which captures the cross-layer evolution of hidden states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T11:44:26Z)
• Detecting Token-Level Hallucinations Using Variance Signals: A Reference-Free Approach [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive generative capabilities across diverse tasks but remain susceptible to hallucinations.<n>We introduce a reference-free, token-level hallucination detection framework that leverages the variance in token log-probabilities across multiple generations.<n>Our approach is model-agnostic, interpretable, and suited for real-time or post-hoc analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-05T19:20:59Z)
• Seeing is Believing? Mitigating OCR Hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models [24.363156120809546]
  We propose KIE-HVQA, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating OCR hallucination in degraded document understanding.<n>This dataset includes test samples spanning identity cards and invoices, with simulated real-world degradations for OCR reliability.<n>Experiments on Qwen2.5-VL demonstrate that our 7B- parameter model achieves a 22% absolute improvement in hallucination-free accuracy over GPT-4o.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T06:44:07Z)
• Mitigating Low-Level Visual Hallucinations Requires Self-Awareness: Database, Model and Training Strategy [53.07517728420411]
  We introduce the first instruction database specifically focused on hallucinations in low-level vision tasks.<n>We propose the Self-Awareness Failure Elimination (SAFEQA) model to improve the perception and comprehension abilities of the model in low-level vision tasks.<n>We conduct comprehensive experiments on low-level vision tasks, with the results demonstrating that our proposed method significantly enhances self-awareness of the model in these tasks and reduces hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T16:05:01Z)
• Detecting LLM Hallucination Through Layer-wise Information Deficiency: Analysis of Ambiguous Prompts and Unanswerable Questions [60.31496362993982]
  Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate confident yet inaccurate responses.<n>We present a novel, test-time approach to detecting model hallucination through systematic analysis of information flow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T16:14:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.