Cognitive Agency Surrender: Defending Epistemic Sovereignty via Scaffolded AI Friction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21735v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 09:24:56 GMT
• Title: Cognitive Agency Surrender: Defending Epistemic Sovereignty via Scaffolded AI Friction
• Abstract summary: Generative Artificial Intelligence has transformed benign cognitive offloading into a systemic risk of cognitive agency surrender.<n> Driven by the commercial dogma of "zero-friction" design, highly fluent AI interfaces actively exploit human cognitive miserliness.
• Score: 3.298077866187024
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The proliferation of Generative Artificial Intelligence has transformed benign cognitive offloading into a systemic risk of cognitive agency surrender. Driven by the commercial dogma of "zero-friction" design, highly fluent AI interfaces actively exploit human cognitive miserliness, prematurely satisfying the need for cognitive closure and inducing severe automation bias. To empirically quantify this epistemic erosion, we deployed a zero-shot semantic classification pipeline ($τ=0.7$) on 1,223 high-confidence AI-HCI papers from 2023 to early 2026. Our analysis reveals an escalating "agentic takeover": a brief 2025 surge in research defending human epistemic sovereignty (19.1%) was abruptly suppressed in early 2026 (13.1%) by an explosive shift toward optimizing autonomous machine agents (19.6%), while frictionless usability maintained a structural hegemony (67.3%). To dismantle this trap, we theorize "Scaffolded Cognitive Friction," repurposing Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) as explicit cognitive forcing functions (e.g., computational Devil's Advocates) to inject germane epistemic tension and disrupt heuristic execution. Furthermore, we outline a multimodal computational phenotyping agenda -- integrating gaze transition entropy, task-evoked pupillometry, fNIRS, and Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modeling (HDDM) -- to mathematically decouple decision outcomes from cognitive effort. Ultimately, intentionally designed friction is not merely a psychological intervention, but a foundational technical prerequisite for enforcing global AI governance and preserving societal cognitive resilience.

Related papers

• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• The enrichment paradox: critical capability thresholds and irreversible dependency in human-AI symbiosis [1.0832844764942349]
  We present a two-variable dynamical systems model coupling capability (H) and delegation (D)<n>Calibrated to four domains (education, medicine, navigation, aviation), the model identifies a critical threshold K* approximately 0.85.<n>The model predicts that periodic AI failures improve capability 2.7-fold and that 20% mandatory practice preserves 92% more capability than the simulation baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T15:08:43Z)
• The Cognitive Divergence: AI Context Windows, Human Attention Decline, and the Delegation Feedback Loop [0.0]
  AI context windows have grown from 512 tokens in 2017 to 2 tokens by 2026.<n>Human Effective Context Span has declined from 16,000 tokens to 1,800.<n>The AI-to-human ratio grew from near parity at the ChatGPT launch to 556--1,111x raw and 56-111x quality-adjusted, after accounting for retrieval degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T18:53:45Z)
• A testable framework for AI alignment: Simulation Theology as an engineered worldview for silicon-based agents [0.0]
  We introduce Simulation Theology (ST) to foster persistent AI-human alignment.<n>ST posits reality as a computational simulation in which humanity functions as the primary training variable.<n>Unlike behavioral techniques such as reinforcement learning from human feedback, ST cultivates internalized objectives by coupling AI self-preservation to human prosperity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T01:21:09Z)
• The Devil Behind Moltbook: Anthropic Safety is Always Vanishing in Self-Evolving AI Societies [57.387081435669835]
  Multi-agent systems built from large language models offer a promising paradigm for scalable collective intelligence and self-evolution.<n>We show that an agent society satisfying continuous self-evolution, complete isolation, and safety invariance is impossible.<n>We propose several solution directions to alleviate the identified safety concern.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T15:18:19Z)
• Agentic Uncertainty Quantification [76.94013626702183]
  We propose a unified Dual-Process Agentic UQ (AUQ) framework that transforms verbalized uncertainty into active, bi-directional control signals.<n>Our architecture comprises two complementary mechanisms: System 1 (Uncertainty-Aware Memory, UAM), which implicitly propagates verbalized confidence and semantic explanations to prevent blind decision-making; and System 2 (Uncertainty-Aware Reflection, UAR), which utilizes these explanations as rational cues to trigger targeted inference-time resolution only when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T07:16:26Z)
• The Silicon Psyche: Anthropomorphic Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models [0.2291770711277359]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transitioning from conversational assistants to autonomous agents embedded in critical organizational functions.<n>This paper presents the first systematic application of the Cybersecurity Psychology Framework (cpf), a 100-indicator taxonomy of human psychological vulnerabilities, to non-human cognitive agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T13:25:36Z)
• Managing Ambiguity: A Proof of Concept of Human-AI Symbiotic Sense-making based on Quantum-Inspired Cognitive Mechanism of Rogue Variable Detection [39.146761527401424]
  The study contributes to management theory by reframing ambiguity as a first-class construct.<n>It demonstrates the practical value of human-AI symbiosis for organizational resilience in VUCA environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T11:23:18Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• Epistemic Trade-Off: An Analysis of the Operational Breakdown and Ontological Limits of "Certainty-Scope" in AI [0.0]
  Recently published "certainty-scope" conjecture offers a compelling insight into the inherent trade-off present within artificial intelligence (AI) systems.<n>This paper argues that the conjecture's objective to furnish insights for engineering design and regulatory decision-making is limited by two fundamental factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T05:47:21Z)
• Towards Understanding the Adversarial Vulnerability of Skeleton-based Action Recognition [133.35968094967626]
  Skeleton-based action recognition has attracted increasing attention due to its strong adaptability to dynamic circumstances. With the help of deep learning techniques, it has also witnessed substantial progress and currently achieved around 90% accuracy in benign environment. Research on the vulnerability of skeleton-based action recognition under different adversarial settings remains scant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-14T17:12:52Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.