Politics of Questions in News: A Mixed-Methods Study of Interrogative Stances as Markers of Voice and Power

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21823v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:04:30 GMT
• Title: Politics of Questions in News: A Mixed-Methods Study of Interrogative Stances as Markers of Voice and Power
• Abstract summary: We study the "Politics of Questions" in contemporary French-language digital news.<n>We detect interrogative stances, approximate their functional types, and locate textual answers when present.<n>Our suggests that questions are overwhelmingly taken up within the same article and usually linked to a subsequent answer-like span.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Interrogatives in news discourse have been examined in linguistics and conversation analysis, but mostly in broadcast interviews and relatively small, often English-language corpora, while large-scale computational studies of news rarely distinguish interrogatives from declaratives or differentiate their functions. This paper brings these strands together through a mixed-methods study of the "Politics of Questions" in contemporary French-language digital news. Using over one million articles published between January 2023 and June 2024, we automatically detect interrogative stances, approximate their functional types, and locate textual answers when present, linking these quantitative measures to a qualitatively annotated subcorpus grounded in semantic and pragmatic theories of questions. Interrogatives are sparse but systematically patterned: they mainly introduce or organize issues, with most remaining cases being information-seeking or echo-like, while explicitly leading or tag questions are rare. Although their density and mix vary across outlets and topics, our heuristic suggests that questions are overwhelmingly taken up within the same article and usually linked to a subsequent answer-like span, most often in the journalist's narrative voice and less often through quoted speech. Interrogative contexts are densely populated with named individuals, organizations, and places, whereas publics and broad social groups are mentioned much less frequently, suggesting that interrogative discourse tends to foreground already prominent actors and places and thus exhibits strong personalization. We show how interrogative stance, textual uptake, and voice can be operationalized at corpus scale, and argue that combining computational methods with pragmatic and sociological perspectives can help account for how questioning practices structure contemporary news discourse.

Related papers

• Multimodal QUD: Inquisitive Questions from Scientific Figures [63.41049609329304]
  We generate inquisitive questions that reach the depth of questions humans generate when engaging with scientific papers.<n>We extend the linguistic theory of Questions Under Discussion (QUD) from being text-only to multimodal.<n>We show that fine-tuning a VLM on MQUD shifts the model from generating generic low-level visual questions to content-specific grounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T14:25:23Z)
• Listening Between the Lines: Decoding Podcast Narratives with Language Modeling [17.51119928424848]
  We show that existing large language models, typically trained on more structured text such as news articles, struggle to capture subtle cues that human listeners rely on to identify narrative frames.<n>Our approach then uses these granular frame labels to reveal broader discourse trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T15:12:06Z)
• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• Synchronization between media followers and political supporters during an election process: towards a real time study [0.18749305679160366]
  We present an analysis of the dynamics of discussions in Twitter (before it became X) among supporters of various candidates in the 2022 French presidential election.<n>Our study demonstrates that we can automatically detect the synchronization of interest among different groups around specific topics at particular times.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T16:25:58Z)
• How to Engage Your Readers? Generating Guiding Questions to Promote Active Reading [60.19226384241482]
  We introduce GuidingQ, a dataset of 10K in-text questions from textbooks and scientific articles. We explore various approaches to generate such questions using language models. We conduct a human study to understand the implication of such questions on reading comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T13:42:56Z)
• NewsDialogues: Towards Proactive News Grounded Conversation [72.10055780635625]
  We propose a novel task, Proactive News Grounded Conversation, in which a dialogue system can proactively lead the conversation based on some key topics of the news. To further develop this novel task, we collect a human-to-human Chinese dialogue dataset tsNewsDialogues, which includes 1K conversations with a total of 14.6K utterances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-12T08:33:42Z)
• Question-Interlocutor Scope Realized Graph Modeling over Key Utterances for Dialogue Reading Comprehension [61.55950233402972]
  We propose a new key utterances extracting method for dialogue reading comprehension. It performs prediction on the unit formed by several contiguous utterances, which can realize more answer-contained utterances. As a graph constructed on the text of utterances, we then propose Question-Interlocutor Scope Realized Graph (QuISG) modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T04:00:42Z)
• Twitter Topic Classification [15.306383757213956]
  We present a new task based on tweet topic classification and release two associated datasets. Given a wide range of topics covering the most important discussion points in social media, we provide training and testing data. We perform a quantitative evaluation and analysis of current general- and domain-specific language models on the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-20T16:13:52Z)
• Advancing an Interdisciplinary Science of Conversation: Insights from a Large Multimodal Corpus of Human Speech [0.12038936091716987]
  In this report we advance an interdisciplinary science of conversation, with findings from a large, multimodal corpus of 1,656 recorded conversations in spoken English. This 7+ million word, 850 hour corpus totals over 1TB of audio, video, and transcripts, with moment-to-moment measures of vocal, facial, and semantic expression. We report (5) a comprehensive mixed-method report, based on quantitative analysis and qualitative review of each recording, that showcases how individuals from diverse backgrounds alter their communication patterns and find ways to connect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-01T18:50:33Z)
• Linguistic Characterization of Divisive Topics Online: Case Studies on Contentiousness in Abortion, Climate Change, and Gun Control [11.127421264715556]
  divisive topics prompt both contentious and non-contentious conversations. We focus on conversations from highly divisive topics (abortion, climate change, and gun control) We operationalize a set of novel linguistic and conversational characteristics and user factors, and incorporate them to build interpretable models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-30T23:55:38Z)
• Who Responded to Whom: The Joint Effects of Latent Topics and Discourse in Conversation Structure [53.77234444565652]
  We identify the responding relations in the conversation discourse, which link response utterances to their initiations. We propose a model to learn latent topics and discourse in word distributions, and predict pairwise initiation-response links. Experimental results on both English and Chinese conversations show that our model significantly outperforms the previous state of the arts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T17:46:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.