Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15125v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 20:30:20 GMT
• Title: Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis
• Abstract summary: We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
• Score: 51.95395936342771
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Social media platforms play a pivotal role in shaping political discourse, but analyzing their vast and rapidly evolving content remains a major challenge. We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus. By combining unsupervised clustering with prompt-based labeling, our method leverages large language models (LLMs) to iteratively construct a taxonomy without requiring seed sets or domain expertise. We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta (previously known as Facebook) political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election. Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions. We show quantitative and qualitative analyses to demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework. Our findings reveal that voting and immigration ads dominate overall spending and impressions, while abortion and election-integrity achieve disproportionate reach. Funding patterns are equally polarized: economic appeals are driven mainly by conservative PACs, abortion messaging splits between pro- and anti-rights coalitions, and crime-and-justice campaigns are fragmented across local committees. The framing of these appeals also diverges--abortion ads emphasize liberty/oppression rhetoric, while economic messaging blends care/harm, fairness/cheating, and liberty/oppression narratives. Topic salience further reveals strong correlations between moral foundations and issues. Demographic targeting also emerges. This work supports scalable, interpretable analysis of political messaging on social media, enabling researchers, policymakers, and the public to better understand emerging narratives, polarization dynamics, and the moral underpinnings of digital political communication.

Related papers

• Automated Identification of Competing Narratives in Political Discourse on Social Media [0.0]
  This paper presents an unsupervised framework for identifying and characterizing competing narratives in political discourse on social media.<n>The framework is able to detect the key competing narratives, highlighting the divergent framings and conflicts surrounding trending political topics.<n>The findings contribute to the broader understanding of how narratives propagate within the digital public sphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-10T08:10:33Z)
• Motivation, Attention, and Visual Platform Design: How Moral Contagions Spread on TikTok and Instagram in the 2024 United States Presidential Election [0.9883261192383612]
  We analyze 2,027,595 TikToks and 1,126,972 Instagram posts during the 2024 US presidential election.<n>Using temporal supply-demand analysis and moral foundations scoring, we examine the dynamics of key electoral issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T18:55:27Z)
• Integrating Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs to Capture Political Viewpoints in News Media [3.509771256227556]
  We develop a pipeline to identify the range of viewpoints expressed about a given topic.<n>We also enrich claim representations with semantic descriptions drawn from Wikidata.<n>We evaluate our approach against alternative solutions on a benchmark centred on the UK immigration debate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T20:10:55Z)
• Modeling Political Discourse with Sentence-BERT and BERTopic [0.0]
  We analyze the longevity and moral dimensions of political topics in Twitter activity during the 117th U.S. Congress.<n>Our findings reveal that while overarching themes remain stable, granular topics tend to dissolve rapidly.<n>Moral foundations play a critical role in topic longevity, with Care and Loyalty dominating durable topics, while partisan differences manifest in distinct moral framing strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T01:19:42Z)
• Unveiling Political Influence Through Social Media: Network and Causal Dynamics in the 2022 French Presidential Election [0.0]
  During the 2022 French presidential election, we collected daily Twitter messages on key topics posted by political candidates and their close networks.<n>Using a data-driven approach, we analyze interactions among political parties, identifying central topics that shape the landscape of political debate.<n>Our findings demonstrate how specific issues, such as health and foreign policy, act as catalysts for cross-party influence, particularly during critical election phases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T16:35:02Z)
• Passing the Turing Test in Political Discourse: Fine-Tuning LLMs to Mimic Polarized Social Media Comments [0.0]
  This study explores the extent to which fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) can replicate and amplify polarizing discourse.<n>Using a curated dataset of politically charged discussions extracted from Reddit, we fine-tune an open-source LLM to produce context-aware and ideologically aligned responses.<n>The results indicate that, when trained on partisan data, LLMs are capable of producing highly plausible and provocative comments, often indistinguishable from those written by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T15:41:26Z)
• Talking Point based Ideological Discourse Analysis in News Events [62.18747509565779]
  We propose a framework motivated by the theory of ideological discourse analysis to analyze news articles related to real-world events.<n>Our framework represents the news articles using a relational structure - talking points, which captures the interaction between entities, their roles, and media frames along with a topic of discussion.<n>We evaluate our framework's ability to generate these perspectives through automated tasks - ideology and partisan classification tasks, supplemented by human validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T02:52:34Z)
• "Whose Side Are You On?" Estimating Ideology of Political and News Content Using Large Language Models and Few-shot Demonstration Selection [5.277598111323805]
  Existing approaches to classifying ideology are limited in that they require extensive human effort, the labeling of large datasets, and are not able to adapt to evolving ideological contexts.<n>This paper explores the potential of Large Language Models for classifying the political ideology of online content in the context of the two-party US political spectrum through in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T02:32:25Z)
• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Aligning AI with Public Values: Deliberation and Decision-Making for Governing Multimodal LLMs in Political Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  How AI models should deal with political topics has been discussed, but it remains challenging and requires better governance.<n>This paper examines the governance of large language models through individual and collective deliberation, focusing on politically sensitive videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• Whose Side Are You On? Investigating the Political Stance of Large Language Models [56.883423489203786]
  We investigate the political orientation of Large Language Models (LLMs) across a spectrum of eight polarizing topics. Our investigation delves into the political alignment of LLMs across a spectrum of eight polarizing topics, spanning from abortion to LGBTQ issues. The findings suggest that users should be mindful when crafting queries, and exercise caution in selecting neutral prompt language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T04:02:24Z)
• Moral consensus and divergence in partisan language use [0.0]
  Polarization has increased substantially in political discourse, contributing to a widening partisan divide. We analyzed large-scale, real-world language use in Reddit communities and in news outlets to uncover psychological dimensions along which partisan language is divided.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T16:50:26Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries.<n>We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.