Understanding Bugs in Quantum Simulators: An Empirical Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22789v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 04:24:25 GMT
• Title: Understanding Bugs in Quantum Simulators: An Empirical Study
• Abstract summary: Quantum simulators are a foundational component of the quantum software ecosystem.<n>They are used to develop and debug quantum programs, validate compiler transformations, and support empirical claims about correctness and performance.<n>Yet, we still lack a large-scale and in-depth study of failures in quantum simulators.
• Score: 0.5926203312586109
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantum simulators are a foundational component of the quantum software ecosystem. They are widely used to develop and debug quantum programs, validate compiler transformations, and support empirical claims about correctness and performance. In the absence of large-scale quantum hardware, simulator outputs are often treated as ground truth for algorithm development and system evaluation. However, quantum simulators also introduce unique implementation challenges. They must faithfully emulate quantum behavior while executing on classical hardware, requiring complex representations of quantum state evolution, operator composition, and noise modeling. Yet, we still lack a large-scale and in-depth study of failures in quantum simulators. To bridge this gap, this work presents a comprehensive empirical study of bugs in widely used open-source quantum simulators. We analyze 394 confirmed bugs from 12 simulators and manually categorize them based on root causes, failure manifestations, affected components, and discovery mechanisms. Our study reveals several key findings. First, bug discovery is largely user-driven, with most crashes, exceptions, and resource-related failures not detected by automated testing and identified after deployment. Second, logical correctness failures are widespread and often silent, producing plausible but incorrect outputs without triggering crashes or explicit error signals. Third, many critical failures originate in classical simulator infrastructure, such as memory management, indexing, configuration, and dependency compatibility, rather than in core quantum execution logic. These findings provide new insights into the reliability challenges of quantum simulators and highlight opportunities to improve testing and validation practices in the quantum software ecosystem.

Related papers

• Enabling large-scale digital quantum simulations with superconducting qubits [0.0]
  Digital quantum simulation could transform fields such as quantum chemistry, condensed matter physics, and materials science.<n>The envisaged long-term solution of fault-tolerant quantum computers that correct their own errors remains out of reach mainly due to the associated qubit number overhead.<n>This thesis contributes to this broader effort by exploring methods for advancing quantum simulation across the full computational stack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T16:29:55Z)
• Reinforcement Learning Control of Quantum Error Correction [108.70420561323692]
  Quantum computer learns to self-improve directly from its errors and never stops computing.<n>This work enables a new paradigm: a quantum computer that learns to self-improve directly from its errors and never stops computing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T17:32:25Z)
• An experience-based classification of quantum bugs in quantum software [0.34376560669160394]
  We describe a set of 14 quantum bugs, sourced primarily from our experience as quantum software developers.<n>We detail their context, symptoms, and the techniques applied to identify and fix them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T12:58:22Z)
• Digital quantum simulation of many-body systems: Making the most of intermediate-scale, noisy quantum computers [51.56484100374058]
  This thesis is centered around simulating quantum dynamics on quantum devices.<n>We present an overview of the most relevant quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics.<n>We identify relevant problems within quantum dynamics that could benefit from quantum simulation in the near future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T10:37:19Z)
• Identifying Flaky Tests in Quantum Code: A Machine Learning Approach [5.323578182914324]
  Indeterminacy, a fundamental characteristic of quantum systems, increases the likelihood of flaky tests in quantum programs.<n>We present a novel machine learning platform that leverages multiple machine learning models to automatically detect flaky tests in quantum programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T19:43:51Z)
• QCircuitBench: A Large-Scale Dataset for Benchmarking Quantum Algorithm Design [63.02824918725805]
  Quantum computing is recognized for the significant speedup it offers over classical computing through quantum algorithms.<n>QCircuitBench is the first benchmark dataset designed to evaluate AI's capability in designing and implementing quantum algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T14:24:30Z)
• The curse of random quantum data [62.24825255497622]
  We quantify the performances of quantum machine learning in the landscape of quantum data. We find that the training efficiency and generalization capabilities in quantum machine learning will be exponentially suppressed with the increase in qubits. Our findings apply to both the quantum kernel method and the large-width limit of quantum neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T12:18:07Z)
• Quantum Tunneling: From Theory to Error-Mitigated Quantum Simulation [49.1574468325115]
  This study presents the theoretical background and the hardware aware circuit implementation of a quantum tunneling simulation. We use error mitigation techniques (ZNE and REM) and multiprogramming of the quantum chip for solving the hardware under-utilization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T14:27:07Z)
• Long-Time Error-Mitigating Simulation of Open Quantum Systems on Near Term Quantum Computers [38.860468003121404]
  We study an open quantum system simulation on quantum hardware, which demonstrates robustness to hardware errors even with deep circuits containing up to two thousand entangling gates. We simulate two systems of electrons coupled to an infinite thermal bath: 1) a system of dissipative free electrons in a driving electric field; and 2) the thermalization of two interacting electrons in a single orbital in a magnetic field -- the Hubbard atom. Our results demonstrate that algorithms for simulating open quantum systems are able to far outperform similarly complex non-dissipative algorithms on noisy hardware.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-02T21:36:37Z)
• Hardware-Efficient, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Rydberg Atoms [55.41644538483948]
  We provide the first complete characterization of sources of error in a neutral-atom quantum computer. We develop a novel and distinctly efficient method to address the most important errors associated with the decay of atomic qubits to states outside of the computational subspace. Our protocols can be implemented in the near-term using state-of-the-art neutral atom platforms with qubits encoded in both alkali and alkaline-earth atoms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T23:29:53Z)
• Considering Decoherence Errors in the Simulation of Quantum Circuits Using Decision Diagrams [2.450250748409888]
  We investigate how the consideration of decoherence errors affects the simulation performance of approaches based on decision diagrams. Experiments confirm that this yields improvements of several orders of magnitudes compared to a naive consideration of errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T12:29:24Z)
• Stochastic Quantum Circuit Simulation Using Decision Diagrams [3.9006434061597877]
  A substantial amount of quantum algorithms research still relies on simulating quantum circuits on classical hardware. We propose to use decision diagrams, as well as concurrent executions, to substantially reduce resource-requirements. Backed up by rigorous theory, empirical studies show that this approach allows for a substantially faster and much more scalable simulation for certain quantum circuits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T12:10:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.