Unlocking Few-Shot Capabilities in LVLMs via Prompt Conditioning and Head Selection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24181v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 11:00:22 GMT
• Title: Unlocking Few-Shot Capabilities in LVLMs via Prompt Conditioning and Head Selection
• Abstract summary: We show that LVLMs can improve visual feature class separability at inference using prompt conditioning.<n>We introduce Head Ensembles (HEC) to bridge the performance gap between CLIP-based and LVLM-based classification methods.
• Score: 12.487816927241056
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Current Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) excel at many zero-shot tasks like image captioning, visual question answering and OCR. However, these same models suffer from poor performance at image classification tasks, underperforming against CLIP-based methods. Notably, this gap is surprising because many LVLMs use CLIP-pretrained vision encoders. Yet LVLMs are not inherently limited by CLIP's architecture with independent vision and text encoders. In CLIP, this separation biases classification toward class-name matching rather than joint visual-text reasoning. In this paper we show that, despite their poor raw performance, LVLMs can improve visual feature class separability at inference using prompt conditioning, and LVLMs' internal representations, especially attention heads, can outperform the model itself at zero-shot and few-shot classification. We introduce Head Ensemble Classifiers (HEC) to bridge the performance gap between CLIP-based and LVLM-based classification methods. Inspired by Gaussian Discriminant Analysis, HEC ranks the most discriminative vision and text heads and combines them into a training-free classifier. We show that HEC achieves state-of-the-art performance in few-shot and zero-shot classification across 12 datasets.

Related papers

• Hierarchical Representation Matching for CLIP-based Class-Incremental Learning [80.2317078787969]
  Class-Incremental Learning (CIL) aims to endow models with the ability to continuously adapt to evolving data streams.<n>Recent advances in pre-trained vision-language models (e.g., CLIP) provide a powerful foundation for this task.<n>We introduce HiErarchical Representation MAtchiNg (HERMAN) for CLIP-based CIL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T17:59:51Z)
• Diffusion Feedback Helps CLIP See Better [40.125318318373715]
  Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) excels at abstracting open-world representations across domains and modalities. CLIP has severe visual shortcomings, such as which can hardly distinguish orientation, quantity, color, structure. We present a post-training approach for CLIP models, which largely overcomes its visual shortcomings via a self-supervised diffusion process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T17:00:09Z)
• African or European Swallow? Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models for Fine-Grained Object Classification [53.89380284760555]
  textttFOCI (textbfFine-grained textbfObject textbfClasstextbfIfication) is a difficult multiple-choice benchmark for fine-grained object classification. textttFOCIxspace complements five popular classification datasets with four domain-specific subsets from ImageNet-21k.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T16:59:39Z)
• Why are Visually-Grounded Language Models Bad at Image Classification? [39.76294811955341]
  We revisit the image classification task using visually-grounded language models (VLMs) such as GPT-4V and LLaVA. We find that existing proprietary and public VLMs significantly underperform CLIP on standard image classification benchmarks like ImageNet. Our analysis reveals that the primary cause is data-related: critical information for image classification is encoded in the VLM's latent space but can only be effectively decoded with enough training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T17:57:06Z)
• Enhancing Fine-Grained Image Classifications via Cascaded Vision Language Models [0.0]
  This paper introduces CascadeVLM, an innovative framework that overcomes the constraints of previous CLIP-based methods. Experiments across various fine-grained image datasets demonstrate that CascadeVLM significantly outperforms existing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-18T14:12:04Z)
• CLAMP: Contrastive LAnguage Model Prompt-tuning [89.96914454453791]
  We show that large language models can achieve good image classification performance when adapted this way. Our approach beats state-of-the-art mLLMs by 13% and slightly outperforms contrastive learning with a custom text model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T05:13:59Z)
• Towards Realistic Zero-Shot Classification via Self Structural Semantic Alignment [53.2701026843921]
  Large-scale pre-trained Vision Language Models (VLMs) have proven effective for zero-shot classification. In this paper, we aim at a more challenging setting, Realistic Zero-Shot Classification, which assumes no annotation but instead a broad vocabulary. We propose the Self Structural Semantic Alignment (S3A) framework, which extracts structural semantic information from unlabeled data while simultaneously self-learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T17:56:46Z)
• Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad Concepts [121.60918966567657]
  WaffleCLIP is a framework for zero-shot visual classification which simply replaces LLM-generated descriptors with random character and word descriptors. We conduct an extensive experimental study on the impact and shortcomings of additional semantics introduced with LLM-generated descriptors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T17:59:48Z)
• Using Representation Expressiveness and Learnability to Evaluate Self-Supervised Learning Methods [61.49061000562676]
  We introduce Cluster Learnability (CL) to assess learnability. CL is measured in terms of the performance of a KNN trained to predict labels obtained by clustering the representations with K-means. We find that CL better correlates with in-distribution model performance than other competing recent evaluation schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-02T19:05:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.