Exploring How Fair Model Representations Relate to Fair Recommendations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24396v1
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:12:20 GMT
- Title: Exploring How Fair Model Representations Relate to Fair Recommendations
- Abstract summary: One of the many fairness definitions pursued in recommender system research targets mitigating demographic information encoded in model representations.<n>We propose two new approaches for measuring how well demographic information can be classified given ranked recommendations.
- Score: 0.19116784879310025
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: One of the many fairness definitions pursued in recent recommender system research targets mitigating demographic information encoded in model representations. Models optimized for this definition are typically evaluated on how well demographic attributes can be classified given model representations, with the (implicit) assumption that this measure accurately reflects \textit{recommendation parity}, i.e., how similar recommendations given to different users are. We challenge this assumption by comparing the amount of demographic information encoded in representations with various measures of how the recommendations differ. We propose two new approaches for measuring how well demographic information can be classified given ranked recommendations. Our results from extensive testing of multiple models on one real and multiple synthetically generated datasets indicate that optimizing for fair representations positively affects recommendation parity, but also that evaluation at the representation level is not a good proxy for measuring this effect when comparing models. We also provide extensive insight into how recommendation-level fairness metrics behave for various models by evaluating their performances on numerous generated datasets with different properties.
Related papers
- Probing Preference Representations: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation and Analysis Method for Reward Models [63.00458229517523]
This work addresses the evaluation challenge of reward models by probing preference representations.<n>We construct a Multi-dimensional Reward Model Benchmark (MRMBench), a collection of six probing tasks for different preference dimensions.<n>We introduce an analysis method, inference-time probing, which identifies the dimensions used during the reward prediction and enhances its interpretability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-16T05:29:29Z) - Where is this coming from? Making groundedness count in the evaluation of Document VQA models [12.951716701565019]
We argue that common evaluation metrics do not account for the semantic and multimodal groundedness of a model's outputs.<n>We propose a new evaluation methodology that accounts for the groundedness of predictions.<n>Our proposed methodology is parameterized in such a way that users can configure the score according to their preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-24T20:14:46Z) - Representer Point Selection for Explaining Regularized High-dimensional
Models [105.75758452952357]
We introduce a class of sample-based explanations we term high-dimensional representers.
Our workhorse is a novel representer theorem for general regularized high-dimensional models.
We study the empirical performance of our proposed methods on three real-world binary classification datasets and two recommender system datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T16:23:58Z) - Revisiting the Evaluation of Image Synthesis with GANs [55.72247435112475]
This study presents an empirical investigation into the evaluation of synthesis performance, with generative adversarial networks (GANs) as a representative of generative models.
In particular, we make in-depth analyses of various factors, including how to represent a data point in the representation space, how to calculate a fair distance using selected samples, and how many instances to use from each set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T17:54:32Z) - Evaluating Representations with Readout Model Switching [19.907607374144167]
In this paper, we propose to use the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle to devise an evaluation metric.
We design a hybrid discrete and continuous-valued model space for the readout models and employ a switching strategy to combine their predictions.
The proposed metric can be efficiently computed with an online method and we present results for pre-trained vision encoders of various architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-19T14:08:01Z) - Exploring validation metrics for offline model-based optimisation with
diffusion models [50.404829846182764]
In model-based optimisation (MBO) we are interested in using machine learning to design candidates that maximise some measure of reward with respect to a black box function called the (ground truth) oracle.
While an approximation to the ground oracle can be trained and used in place of it during model validation to measure the mean reward over generated candidates, the evaluation is approximate and vulnerable to adversarial examples.
This is encapsulated under our proposed evaluation framework which is also designed to measure extrapolation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-19T16:57:37Z) - A Recommendation Approach based on Similarity-Popularity Models of
Complex Networks [1.385805101975528]
This work proposes a novel recommendation method based on complex networks generated by a similarity-popularity model to predict ones.
We first construct a model of a network having users and items as nodes from observed ratings and then use it to predict unseen ratings.
The proposed approach is implemented and experimentally compared against baseline and state-of-the-art recommendation methods on 21 datasets from various domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-29T11:00:06Z) - How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating
and Auditing Generative Models [95.8037674226622]
We introduce a 3-dimensional evaluation metric that characterizes the fidelity, diversity and generalization performance of any generative model in a domain-agnostic fashion.
Our metric unifies statistical divergence measures with precision-recall analysis, enabling sample- and distribution-level diagnoses of model fidelity and diversity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T18:25:30Z) - Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective
Labels [69.64662540443162]
We develop a framework for characterizing predictive fairness properties over the set of models that deliver similar overall performance.
We provide tractable algorithms to compute the range of attainable group-level predictive disparities.
We extend our framework to address the empirically relevant challenge of selectively labelled data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-02T02:11:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.