More Than "Means to an End": Supporting Reasoning with Transparently Designed AI Data Science Processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24877v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 23:47:54 GMT
• Title: More Than "Means to an End": Supporting Reasoning with Transparently Designed AI Data Science Processes
• Abstract summary: We reflect on two AI data science systems designed for the medical setting.<n>We find that success in these systems was driven by constructing AI around intentionally-designed intermediate artifacts.
• Score: 12.407870690451027
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools can now help people perform complex data science tasks regardless of their expertise. While these tools have great potential to help more people work with data, their end-to-end approach does not support users in evaluating alternative approaches and reformulating problems, both critical to solving open-ended tasks in high-stakes domains. In this paper, we reflect on two AI data science systems designed for the medical setting and how they function as tools for thought. We find that success in these systems was driven by constructing AI workflows around intentionally-designed intermediate artifacts, such as readable query languages, concept definitions, or input-output examples. Despite opaqueness in other parts of the AI process, these intermediates helped users reason about important analytical choices, refine their initial questions, and contribute their unique knowledge. We invite the HCI community to consider when and how intermediate artifacts should be designed to promote effective data science thinking.

Related papers

• Intentmaking and Sensemaking: Human Interaction with AI-Guided Mathematical Discovery [72.49593499512092]
  We identify and characterize a distinct workflow we term intentmaking.<n>We frame this as a natural extension to sensemaking.<n>Our documentation of these themes suggests an approach to designing AI tools for scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T09:30:25Z)
• Towards Agentic Intelligence for Materials Science [73.4576385477731]
  This survey advances a unique pipeline-centric view that spans from corpus curation and pretraining to goal-conditioned agents interfacing with simulation and experimental platforms.<n>To bridge communities and establish a shared frame of reference, we first present an integrated lens that aligns terminology, evaluation, and workflow stages across AI and materials science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T23:48:43Z)
• What's the next frontier for Data-centric AI? Data Savvy Agents [71.76058707995398]
  We argue that data-savvy capabilities should be a top priority in the design of agentic systems.<n>We propose four key capabilities to realize this vision: Proactive data acquisition, Sophisticated data processing, Interactive test data synthesis, and Continual adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-02T17:09:29Z)
• Barbarians at the Gate: How AI is Upending Systems Research [58.95406995634148]
  We argue that systems research, long focused on designing and evaluating new performance-oriented algorithms, is particularly well-suited for AI-driven solution discovery.<n>We term this approach as AI-Driven Research for Systems ( ADRS), which iteratively generates, evaluates, and refines solutions.<n>Our results highlight both the disruptive potential and the urgent need to adapt systems research practices in the age of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T17:49:24Z)
• How Software Engineers Engage with AI: A Pragmatic Process Model and Decision Framework Grounded in Industry Observations [1.516251872371896]
  GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT have given rise to "vibe coding"<n>This paper presents two complementary contributions.<n>First, a pragmatic process model capturing real-world AI-assisted SE activities, including prompt design, inspection, fallback, and refinement.<n>Second, a 2D decision framework that could help developers reason about trade-offs between effort saved and output quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T21:00:21Z)
• AI, Humans, and Data Science: Optimizing Roles Across Workflows and the Workforce [0.0]
  We consider the potential and limitation of analytic, generative, and agentic AI to augment data scientists or take on tasks traditionally done by human analysts and researchers.<n>Just as earlier eras of survey analysis created issues when the increased ease of using statistical software allowed researchers to conduct analyses they did not fully understand, the new AI tools may create similar but larger risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T17:59:06Z)
• Measuring Data Science Automation: A Survey of Evaluation Tools for AI Assistants and Agents [9.675331256405443]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been increasingly used as assistants for data science.<n>In this paper, we survey the evaluation of LLM assistants and agents for data science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T13:47:22Z)
• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Data-centric Artificial Intelligence: A Survey [47.24049907785989]
  Recently, the role of data in AI has been significantly magnified, giving rise to the emerging concept of data-centric AI. In this survey, we discuss the necessity of data-centric AI, followed by a holistic view of three general data-centric goals. We believe this is the first comprehensive survey that provides a global view of a spectrum of tasks across various stages of the data lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T17:44:56Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Banking and Financial Services [0.0]
  We study and analyze the recent work done in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods and tools. We introduce a novel XAI process, which facilitates producing explainable models while maintaining a high level of learning performance. We develop a digital dashboard to facilitate interacting with the algorithm results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-14T08:02:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.