FinMCP-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use under the Model Context Protocol
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24943v1
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 02:20:04 GMT
- Title: FinMCP-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use under the Model Context Protocol
- Abstract summary: FinMCP-Bench is a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in solving real-world financial problems.<n>It incorporates 65 real financial MCPs and three types of samples, single tool, multi-tool, and multi-turn, allowing evaluation of models across different levels of task complexity.
- Score: 25.065258058016052
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper introduces \textbf{FinMCP-Bench}, a novel benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in solving real-world financial problems through tool invocation of financial model context protocols. FinMCP-Bench contains 613 samples spanning 10 main scenarios and 33 sub-scenarios, featuring both real and synthetic user queries to ensure diversity and authenticity. It incorporates 65 real financial MCPs and three types of samples, single tool, multi-tool, and multi-turn, allowing evaluation of models across different levels of task complexity. Using this benchmark, we systematically assess a range of mainstream LLMs and propose metrics that explicitly measure tool invocation accuracy and reasoning capabilities. FinMCP-Bench provides a standardized, practical, and challenging testbed for advancing research on financial LLM agents.
Related papers
- ComplexMCP: Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dynamic, Interdependent, and Large-Scale Tool Sandbox [61.862814740220806]
$textbfComplexMCP$ is a benchmark designed to evaluate agents in rigorous conditions.<n>Built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), $textbfComplexMCP$ provides over 300 meticulously tested tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-11T16:20:51Z) - Time Series Augmented Generation for Financial Applications [0.10499611180329804]
We introduce a novel evaluation methodology and benchmark designed to rigorously measure an agent's reasoning for financial time-series analysis.<n>We apply this methodology in a large-scale empirical study using our framework, Time Series Augmented Generation.<n>The results demonstrate that capable agents can achieve near-perfect tool-use accuracy with minimal hallucination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-21T16:20:59Z) - FinToolBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use [11.47696602663462]
FinToolBench is the first real-world, runnable benchmark dedicated to evaluating financial tool learning agents.<n>We propose a novel evaluation framework that goes beyond binary execution success, assessing agents on finance-critical dimensions.<n>We present FATR, a finance-aware tool retrieval and reasoning baseline that enhances stability and compliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-09T11:33:05Z) - The CLEF-2026 FinMMEval Lab: Multilingual and Multimodal Evaluation of Financial AI Systems [54.12165004393043]
FinMMEval 2026 offers three interconnected tasks that span financial understanding, reasoning, and decision-making.<n>The lab aims to promote the development of robust, transparent, and globally inclusive financial AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-11T14:14:06Z) - FinSight: Towards Real-World Financial Deep Research [68.31086471310773]
FinSight is a novel framework for producing high-quality, multimodal financial reports.<n>To ensure professional-grade visualization, we propose an Iterative Vision-Enhanced Mechanism.<n>A two-stage Writing Framework expands concise Chain-of-Analysis segments into coherent, citation-aware, and multimodal reports.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-19T14:05:35Z) - FinLFQA: Evaluating Attributed Text Generation of LLMs in Financial Long-Form Question Answering [57.43420753842626]
FinLFQA is a benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of Large Language Models to generate long-form answers to complex financial questions.<n>We provide an automatic evaluation framework covering both answer quality and attribution quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T20:06:15Z) - MultiFinBen: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multilingual and Multimodal Financial Application [118.63802040274999]
MultiFinBen is the first expert-annotated multilingual (five languages) and multimodal benchmark for evaluating LLMs in realistic financial contexts.<n>Financial reasoning tests cross-lingual evidence integration from filings and news, and financial OCR, which extracts structured text from scanned documents.<n> evaluating 21 leading LLMs shows that even frontier multimodal models like GPT-4o achieve only 46.01% overall, stronger on vision and audio but dropping sharply in multilingual settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T22:01:49Z) - FinMaster: A Holistic Benchmark for Mastering Full-Pipeline Financial Workflows with LLMs [15.230256296815565]
FinMaster is a benchmark designed to assess the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in financial literacy, accounting, auditing, and consulting.<n>FinMaster comprises three main modules: FinSim, FinSuite, and FinEval.<n>Experiments reveal critical capability gaps in financial reasoning, with accuracy dropping from over 90% on basic tasks to merely 37% on complex scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-18T11:47:55Z) - FinTSB: A Comprehensive and Practical Benchmark for Financial Time Series Forecasting [58.70072722290475]
Financial time series (FinTS) record the behavior of human-brain-augmented decision-making.<n>FinTSB is a comprehensive and practical benchmark for financial time series forecasting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-26T05:19:16Z) - FinMTEB: Finance Massive Text Embedding Benchmark [12.949322198287417]
We introduce the Finance Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (FinMTEB), a specialized counterpart to MTEB designed for the financial domain.<n>FinMTEB comprises 64 financial domain-specific embedding datasets across 7 tasks.<n>We show three key findings: (1) performance on general-purpose benchmarks shows limited correlation with financial domain tasks; (2) domain-adapted models consistently outperform their general-purpose counterparts; and (3) surprisingly, a simple Bag-of-Words approach outperforms sophisticated dense embeddings in financial Semantic Textual Similarity tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-16T04:23:52Z) - Evaluating Large Language Models on Financial Report Summarization: An Empirical Study [9.28042182186057]
We conduct a comparative study on three state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our primary motivation is to explore how these models can be harnessed within finance, a field demanding precision, contextual relevance, and robustness against erroneous or misleading information.
We introduce an innovative evaluation framework that integrates both quantitative metrics (e.g., precision, recall) and qualitative analyses (e.g., contextual fit, consistency) to provide a holistic view of each model's output quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T10:36:04Z) - CatMemo at the FinLLM Challenge Task: Fine-Tuning Large Language Models using Data Fusion in Financial Applications [10.225210627594894]
This paper presents our solution to IJCAI-2024 FinLLM challenge, investigating the capabilities of LLMs within three critical areas of financial tasks.
Financial classification, financial text summarization, and single stock trading are investigated.
Our approach aims to tackle these diverse tasks in a comprehensive and integrated manner, showcasing LLMs' capacity to address diverse and complex financial tasks with improved accuracy and decision-making capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T05:04:13Z) - PIXIU: A Large Language Model, Instruction Data and Evaluation Benchmark
for Finance [63.51545277822702]
PIXIU is a comprehensive framework including the first financial large language model (LLMs) based on fine-tuning LLaMA with instruction data.
We propose FinMA by fine-tuning LLaMA with the constructed dataset to be able to follow instructions for various financial tasks.
We conduct a detailed analysis of FinMA and several existing LLMs, uncovering their strengths and weaknesses in handling critical financial tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T14:20:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.