Building to Understand: Examining Teens' Technical and Socio-Ethical Pieces of Understandings in the Construction of Small Generative Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25852v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:20:39 GMT
• Title: Building to Understand: Examining Teens' Technical and Socio-Ethical Pieces of Understandings in the Construction of Small Generative Language Models
• Abstract summary: The rising adoption of generative AI/ML technologies increases the need to support teens in developing these systems.<n>Recent studies demonstrate the feasibility of engaging teens in the construction of very small generative language models (LMs)<n>We conducted a week-long participatory design workshop in which sixteen teenagers constructed very small LMs to generate recipes, screenplays, and songs.
• Score: 2.4937400423177762
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The rising adoption of generative AI/ML technologies increases the need to support teens in developing AI/ML literacies. Child-computer interaction research argues that construction activities can support young people in understanding these systems and their implications. Recent exploratory studies demonstrate the feasibility of engaging teens in the construction of very small generative language models (LMs). However, it is unclear how constructing such models may foster the development of teens' understanding of these systems from technical and socio-ethical perspectives. We conducted a week-long participatory design workshop in which sixteen teenagers constructed very small LMs to generate recipes, screenplays, and songs. Using thematic analysis, we identified technical and socio-ethical pieces of understandings that teens exhibited while designing generative LMs. This paper contributes (a) evidence of the kinds of pieces of understandings that teens have when constructing LMs and (b) a theory-backed framing to study novices' understandings of AI/ML systems.

Related papers

• The Ramon Llull's Thinking Machine for Automated Ideation [52.06378166909451]
  Our approach defines three compositional axes: Theme, Domain, and Method.<n>We show that prompting LLMs with curated combinations produces research ideas that are diverse, relevant, and grounded in current literature.<n>This modern thinking machine offers a lightweight, interpretable tool for augmenting scientific creativity and suggests a path toward collaborative ideation between humans and AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T17:03:43Z)
• Learning AI Auditing: A Case Study of Teenagers Auditing a Generative AI Model [0.0]
  We conducted a two-week participatory design workshop with 14 teenagers (ages 14-15)<n>They audited the generative AI model behind TikTok's Effect House, a tool for creating interactive TikTok filters.<n>Our findings show that participants were engaged and creative throughout the activities, independently raising and exploring new considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T21:57:25Z)
• Investigating Youth's Technical and Ethical Understanding of Generative Language Models When Engaging in Construction and Deconstruction Activities [0.0]
  This study investigates how engaging young people in the design and auditing of generative language models (GLMs) may foster the development of their understanding of how these systems work from both technical and ethical perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T14:30:16Z)
• Building babyGPTs: Youth Engaging in Data Practices and Ethical Considerations through the Construction of Generative Language Models [0.0]
  Youth are increasingly using generative language models (GLMs) in their everyday lives.<n>Most research has centered on supporting youth as users of GLM-powered systems.<n>This paper contributes a case study that demonstrates the feasibility of engaging youth in building GLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T23:40:29Z)
• Form-Substance Discrimination: Concept, Cognition, and Pedagogy [55.2480439325792]
  This paper examines form-substance discrimination as an essential learning outcome for curriculum development in higher education.<n>We propose practical strategies for fostering this ability through curriculum design, assessment practices, and explicit instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T04:15:56Z)
• Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges [88.3032929492409]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents, with goal-driven behaviors and dynamic adaptation capabilities, potentially represent a critical pathway toward artificial general intelligence.<n>This survey systematically deconstructs LLM agent systems through a methodology-centered taxonomy.<n>Our work provides a unified architectural perspective, examining how agents are constructed, how they collaborate, and how they evolve over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T12:50:17Z)
• Youth as Peer Auditors: Engaging Teenagers with Algorithm Auditing of Machine Learning Applications [0.44998333629984877]
  This paper positions youth as auditors of their peers' machine learning (ML)-powered applications. In a two-week workshop, 13 youth (ages 14-15) designed and audited ML-powered applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T21:15:26Z)
• Investigating Youths' Everyday Understanding of Machine Learning Applications: a Knowledge-in-Pieces Perspective [0.0]
  Despite recent calls for including artificial intelligence in K-12 education, not enough attention has been paid to studying youths' everyday knowledge about machine learning (ML) We investigate teens' everyday understanding of ML through a knowledge-in-pieces perspective. Our analyses reveal that youths showed some understanding that ML applications learn from training data and that applications recognize patterns in input data and depending on these provide different outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T16:11:33Z)
• Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlook [69.02214694865229]
  We systematically review the technological advancements in each perspective, organize related datasets and benchmarks, and identify the risks and challenges associated with deploying LLMs in education. Our survey aims to provide a comprehensive technological picture for educators, researchers, and policymakers to harness the power of LLMs to revolutionize educational practices and foster a more effective personalized learning environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T21:04:29Z)
• Language Models: A Guide for the Perplexed [51.88841610098437]
  This tutorial aims to help narrow the gap between those who study language models and those who are intrigued and want to learn more. We offer a scientific viewpoint that focuses on questions amenable to study through experimentation. We situate language models as they are today in the context of the research that led to their development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T01:19:02Z)
• Evaluating, Understanding, and Improving Constrained Text Generation for Large Language Models [49.74036826946397]
  This study investigates constrained text generation for large language models (LLMs) Our research mainly focuses on mainstream open-source LLMs, categorizing constraints into lexical, structural, and relation-based types. Results illuminate LLMs' capacity and deficiency to incorporate constraints and provide insights for future developments in constrained text generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T03:58:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.