Semi-Automated Knowledge Engineering and Process Mapping for Total Airport Management
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26076v1
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 05:07:58 GMT
- Title: Semi-Automated Knowledge Engineering and Process Mapping for Total Airport Management
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a framework for constructing a domain-grounded, machine-readable Knowledge Graph.<n>The framework employs a scaffolded fusion strategy in which expert-curated KE structures guide Large Language Models.<n>The proposed framework fuses a probabilistic model for discovery and a deterministic algorithm for anchoring every extraction to its ground source.
- Score: 3.0773704200707233
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Documentation of airport operations is inherently complex due to extensive technical terminology, rigorous regulations, proprietary regional information, and fragmented communication across multiple stakeholders. The resulting data silos and semantic inconsistencies present a significant impediment to the Total Airport Management (TAM) initiative. This paper presents a methodological framework for constructing a domain-grounded, machine-readable Knowledge Graph (KG) through a dual-stage fusion of symbolic Knowledge Engineering (KE) and generative Large Language Models (LLMs). The framework employs a scaffolded fusion strategy in which expert-curated KE structures guide LLM prompts to facilitate the discovery of semantically aligned knowledge triples. We evaluate this methodology on the Google LangExtract library and investigate the impact of context window utilization by comparing localized segment-based inference with document-level processing. Contrary to prior empirical observations of long-context degradation in LLMs, document-level processing improves the recovery of non-linear procedural dependencies. To ensure the high-fidelity provenance required in airport operations, the proposed framework fuses a probabilistic model for discovery and a deterministic algorithm for anchoring every extraction to its ground source. This ensures absolute traceability and verifiability, bridging the gap between "black-box" generative outputs and the transparency required for operational tooling. Finally, we introduce an automated framework that operationalizes this pipeline to synthesize complex operational workflows from unstructured textual corpora.
Related papers
- Understanding by Reconstruction: Reversing the Software Development Process for LLM Pretraining [66.89012795621349]
Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with the deep, long-horizon reasoning required for complex software engineering.<n>We propose a novel paradigm: understanding via reconstruction.<n>We introduce a framework that synthesizes latent agentic trajectories using a multi-agent simulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T09:23:20Z) - AI Agent for Reverse-Engineering Legacy Finite-Difference Code and Translating to Devito [0.0]
This study develops an integrated AI framework to facilitate the transformation of legacy finite difference implementations into the Devito environment.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and open-source Large Language Models are combined through multi-stage iterative in the system's hybrid LangGraph architecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-26T11:31:00Z) - Ontology-aligned structuring and reuse of multimodal materials data and workflows towards automatic reproduction [1.4658400971135652]
Existing text-mining approaches are insufficient to extract complete computational with associated parameters.<n>A large language model (LLM)-assisted framework is introduced for the automated extraction and structuring of computational density from the literature.<n>The framework provides a foundation for organizing and contextualizing published results in a semantically interoperable form, thereby improving transparency and reusability of computational materials data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-18T20:51:23Z) - Event Extraction in Large Language Model [99.94321497574805]
We argue that EE should be viewed as a system component that provides a cognitive scaffold for LLM centered solutions.<n>This survey covers EE in text and multimodal settings, organizing tasks and taxonomy, tracing method evolution from rule based and neural models to instruction driven and generative frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-22T16:22:14Z) - Code-in-the-Loop Forensics: Agentic Tool Use for Image Forgery Detection [59.04089915447622]
ForenAgent is an interactive IFD framework that enables MLLMs to autonomously generate, execute, and refine Python-based low-level tools around the detection objective.<n>Inspired by human reasoning, we design a dynamic reasoning loop comprising global perception, local focusing, iterative probing, and holistic adjudication.<n>Experiments show that ForenAgent exhibits emergent tool-use competence and reflective reasoning on challenging IFD tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-18T08:38:44Z) - Integrating Domain Knowledge into Process Discovery Using Large Language Models [3.7448613209842967]
We propose an interactive framework that incorporates domain knowledge, expressed in natural language, into the process discovery pipeline.<n>The framework coordinates interactions among the Large Language Models (LLMs), domain experts, and a set of backend services.<n>Our empirical study includes a case study based on a real-life event log with the involvement of domain experts, who assessed the usability and effectiveness of the framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-08T15:59:11Z) - Automatic Building Code Review: A Case Study [6.530899637501737]
Building officials face labor-intensive, error-prone, and costly manual reviews of design documents as projects increase in size and complexity.<n>This study introduces a novel agent-driven framework that integrates BIM-based data extraction with automated verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-03T00:30:14Z) - Exploratory Semantic Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbine Maintenance Logs using Large Language Models [0.0]
This paper addresses the gap in leveraging modern large language models (LLMs) for more complex reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce an exploratory framework that uses LLMs to move beyond classification and perform semantic analysis.<n>The results demonstrate that LLMs can function as powerful "reliability co-pilots," moving beyond labelling to synthesise textual information and actionable, expert-level hypotheses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T14:00:20Z) - LEARN: Knowledge Adaptation from Large Language Model to Recommendation for Practical Industrial Application [54.984348122105516]
Llm-driven knowlEdge Adaptive RecommeNdation (LEARN) framework synergizes open-world knowledge with collaborative knowledge.<n>We propose an Llm-driven knowlEdge Adaptive RecommeNdation (LEARN) framework that synergizes open-world knowledge with collaborative knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-07T04:00:30Z) - Contextualization Distillation from Large Language Model for Knowledge
Graph Completion [51.126166442122546]
We introduce the Contextualization Distillation strategy, a plug-in-and-play approach compatible with both discriminative and generative KGC frameworks.
Our method begins by instructing large language models to transform compact, structural triplets into context-rich segments.
Comprehensive evaluations across diverse datasets and KGC techniques highlight the efficacy and adaptability of our approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-28T08:56:49Z) - Cross-Supervised Joint-Event-Extraction with Heterogeneous Information
Networks [61.950353376870154]
Joint-event-extraction is a sequence-to-sequence labeling task with a tag set composed of tags of triggers and entities.
We propose a Cross-Supervised Mechanism (CSM) to alternately supervise the extraction of triggers or entities.
Our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in both entity and trigger extraction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-13T11:51:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.