"Oops! ChatGPT is Temporarily Unavailable!": A Diary Study on Knowledge Workers' Experiences of LLM Withdrawal

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26099v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 06:13:27 GMT
• Title: "Oops! ChatGPT is Temporarily Unavailable!": A Diary Study on Knowledge Workers' Experiences of LLM Withdrawal
• Abstract summary: LLMs have become deeply embedded in knowledge work, raising concerns about growing dependency and the potential undermining of human skills.<n>Our findings show how self-directed work led participants to reclaim professional values, and how everyday practices revealed the extent to which LLM use had become inescapably normative.<n>This research contributes empirical insights into the often invisible role of LLMs and proposes value-driven appropriation as an approach to supporting professional values in the current LLM-pervasive work environment.
• Score: 13.938784393853908
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: LLMs have become deeply embedded in knowledge work, raising concerns about growing dependency and the potential undermining of human skills. To investigate the pervasiveness of LLMs in work practices, we conducted a four-day diary study with frequent LLM users (N=10), observing how knowledge workers responded to a temporary withdrawal of LLMs. Our findings show how LLM withdrawal disrupted participants' workflows by identifying gaps in task execution, how self-directed work led participants to reclaim professional values, and how everyday practices revealed the extent to which LLM use had become inescapably normative. Conceptualizing LLMs as infrastructural to contemporary knowledge work, this research contributes empirical insights into the often invisible role of LLMs and proposes value-driven appropriation as an approach to supporting professional values in the current LLM-pervasive work environment.

Related papers

• Demystify, Use, Reflect, Assess (DURA): An Experience Report on LLM Integration in CS2 [11.901902742791357]
  We restructure our CS2 course to allow the use of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We first demystified LLMs, then provided guidance on use with required attribution.<n>We also added reflections related to LLM use at three points throughout the semester to encourage student meta-cognition around LLM use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-29T20:57:52Z)
• Demystify, Use, Reflect: Preparing students to be informed LLM-users [12.70014939919203]
  This course introduces Large Language Models (LLMs) in a structured, critical, and practical manner.<n>It aims to help students develop the skills needed to engage meaningfully and responsibly with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T04:43:49Z)
• LLM-Specific Utility: A New Perspective for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [110.610512800947]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge.<n>Existing studies often treat utility as a generic attribute, ignoring the fact that different LLMs may benefit differently from the same passage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T12:57:45Z)
• Performance Gains of LLMs With Humans in a World of LLMs Versus Humans [1.12376792916275]
  Currently, a considerable research effort is devoted to comparing LLMs to a group of human experts.<n>Without proper safeguards in place, LLMs will threaten to cause harm to the established structure of safe delivery of patient care.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T18:44:22Z)
• Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review [8.524433537542484]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been positioned to revolutionize HCI.<n>To-date, there has been little understanding of LLMs' uptake in HCI.<n>We review 153 CHI papers from 2020-24 that engage with LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-22T00:31:51Z)
• A Reality check of the benefits of LLM in business [1.9181612035055007]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in language understanding and generation tasks. This paper thoroughly examines the usefulness and readiness of LLMs for business processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T02:36:00Z)
• A Survey of Useful LLM Evaluation [20.048914787813263]
  Two-stage framework: from core ability'' to agent'' In the "core ability" stage, we discussed the reasoning ability, societal impact, and domain knowledge of LLMs. In the agent'' stage, we demonstrated embodied action, planning, and tool learning of LLMs agent applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T02:20:03Z)
• Small Models, Big Insights: Leveraging Slim Proxy Models To Decide When and What to Retrieve for LLMs [60.40396361115776]
  This paper introduces a novel collaborative approach, namely SlimPLM, that detects missing knowledge in large language models (LLMs) with a slim proxy model. We employ a proxy model which has far fewer parameters, and take its answers as answers. Heuristic answers are then utilized to predict the knowledge required to answer the user question, as well as the known and unknown knowledge within the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T11:11:08Z)
• When Do LLMs Need Retrieval Augmentation? Mitigating LLMs' Overconfidence Helps Retrieval Augmentation [66.01754585188739]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been found to have difficulty knowing they do not possess certain knowledge. Retrieval Augmentation (RA) has been extensively studied to mitigate LLMs' hallucinations. We propose several methods to enhance LLMs' perception of knowledge boundaries and show that they are effective in reducing overconfidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T04:57:19Z)
• Rethinking the Roles of Large Language Models in Chinese Grammatical Error Correction [62.409807640887834]
  Chinese Grammatical Error Correction (CGEC) aims to correct all potential grammatical errors in the input sentences. LLMs' performance as correctors on CGEC remains unsatisfactory due to its challenging task focus. We rethink the roles of LLMs in the CGEC task so that they can be better utilized and explored in CGEC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T01:40:34Z)
• Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificity [61.54815512469125]
  This survey addresses the crucial issue of factuality in Large Language Models (LLMs) As LLMs find applications across diverse domains, the reliability and accuracy of their outputs become vital.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T14:18:03Z)
• Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentation [109.8527403904657]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) possess unwavering confidence in their knowledge and cannot handle the conflict between internal and external knowledge well. Retrieval augmentation proves to be an effective approach in enhancing LLMs' awareness of knowledge boundaries. We propose a simple method to dynamically utilize supporting documents with our judgement strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T16:46:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.