Fair Data Pre-Processing with Imperfect Attribute Space

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26456v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:27:13 GMT
• Title: Fair Data Pre-Processing with Imperfect Attribute Space
• Abstract summary: LatentPre is a novel framework that enables principled and robust fair data processing in practical settings.<n>LatentPre augments the fairness policy with latent attributes that capture essential but subtle signals.<n>Experiments demonstrate that LatentPre consistently achieves strong fairness-utility trade-offs across diverse scenarios.
• Score: 9.017721212703352
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Fair data pre-processing is a widely used strategy for mitigating bias in machine learning. A promising line of research focuses on calibrating datasets to satisfy a designed fairness policy so that sensitive attributes influence outcomes only through clearly specified legitimate causal pathways. While effective on clean and information-rich data, these methods often break down in real-world scenarios with imperfect attribute spaces, where decision-relevant factors may be deemed unusable or even missing. To address this gap, we propose LatentPre, a novel framework that enables principled and robust fair data processing in practical settings. Instead of relying solely on observed attributes, LatentPre augments the fairness policy with latent attributes that capture essential but subtle signals, enabling the framework to operate as if the attribute space were perfect. These latent attributes are strategically introduced to guarantee identifiability and are estimated using a tailored expectation-maximization paradigm. The raw data is then carefully refined to conform to this latent-augmented policy, effectively removing biased patterns while preserving justifiable ones. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LatentPre consistently achieves strong fairness-utility trade-offs across diverse scenarios, advancing practical fairness-aware data management.

Related papers

• Understanding Fairness and Prediction Error through Subspace Decomposition and Influence Analysis [20.446739075831722]
  We propose a principled framework that adjusts data representations to balance predictive utility and fairness.<n>We provide a theoretical analysis of how prediction error and fairness gaps evolve as shared subspaces are added.<n>Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets validate our theoretical insights and show that the proposed method effectively improves fairness while preserving predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T23:38:00Z)
• Targeted Learning for Data Fairness [52.59573714151884]
  We expand fairness inference by evaluating fairness in the data generating process itself.<n>We derive estimators demographic parity, equal opportunity, and conditional mutual information.<n>To validate our approach, we perform several simulations and apply our estimators to real data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T18:51:28Z)
• Identifying and Mitigating Social Bias Knowledge in Language Models [52.52955281662332]
  We propose a novel debiasing approach, Fairness Stamp (FAST), which enables fine-grained calibration of individual social biases.<n>FAST surpasses state-of-the-art baselines with superior debiasing performance.<n>This highlights the potential of fine-grained debiasing strategies to achieve fairness in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T17:14:58Z)
• Lazy Data Practices Harm Fairness Research [49.02318458244464]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of fair ML datasets, demonstrating how unreflective practices hinder the reach and reliability of algorithmic fairness findings. Our analyses identify three main areas of concern: (1) a textbflack of representation for certain protected attributes in both data and evaluations; (2) the widespread textbf of minorities during data preprocessing; and (3) textbfopaque data processing threatening the generalization of fairness research. This study underscores the need for a critical reevaluation of data practices in fair ML and offers directions to improve both the sourcing and usage of datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T09:51:24Z)
• A Sequentially Fair Mechanism for Multiple Sensitive Attributes [0.46040036610482665]
  In the standard use case of Algorithmic Fairness, the goal is to eliminate the relationship between a sensitive variable and a corresponding score. We propose a sequential framework, which allows to progressively achieve fairness across a set of sensitive features. Our approach seamlessly extends to approximate fairness, enveloping a framework accommodating the trade-off between risk and unfairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T22:31:57Z)
• Fairness Under Demographic Scarce Regime [7.523105080786704]
  We propose a framework to build attribute classifiers that achieve better fairness-accuracy tradeoffs. We show that enforcing fairness constraints on samples with uncertain sensitive attributes can negatively impact the fairness-accuracy tradeoff. Our framework can outperform models trained with fairness constraints on the true sensitive attributes in most benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T19:07:34Z)
• Learning for Counterfactual Fairness from Observational Data [62.43249746968616]
  Fairness-aware machine learning aims to eliminate biases of learning models against certain subgroups described by certain protected (sensitive) attributes such as race, gender, and age. A prerequisite for existing methods to achieve counterfactual fairness is the prior human knowledge of the causal model for the data. In this work, we address the problem of counterfactually fair prediction from observational data without given causal models by proposing a novel framework CLAIRE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T04:08:29Z)
• Towards Assumption-free Bias Mitigation [47.5131072745805]
  We propose an assumption-free framework to detect the related attributes automatically by modeling feature interaction for bias mitigation. Experimental results on four real-world datasets demonstrate that our proposed framework can significantly alleviate unfair prediction behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T05:55:25Z)
• Practical Approaches for Fair Learning with Multitype and Multivariate Sensitive Attributes [70.6326967720747]
  It is important to guarantee that machine learning algorithms deployed in the real world do not result in unfairness or unintended social consequences. We introduce FairCOCCO, a fairness measure built on cross-covariance operators on reproducing kernel Hilbert Spaces. We empirically demonstrate consistent improvements against state-of-the-art techniques in balancing predictive power and fairness on real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T11:28:46Z)
• When Fairness Meets Privacy: Fair Classification with Semi-Private Sensitive Attributes [18.221858247218726]
  We study a novel and practical problem of fair classification in a semi-private setting. Most of the sensitive attributes are private and only a small amount of clean ones are available. We propose a novel framework FairSP that can achieve Fair prediction under the Semi-Private setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T01:10:25Z)
• Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
  We consider fairness in the integration component of data management. We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.