Voice-based debate with an AI adversary is associated with increased divergent ideation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27073v1
• Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 01:23:38 GMT
• Title: Voice-based debate with an AI adversary is associated with increased divergent ideation
• Abstract summary: Concerns that interacting with generative AI homogenizes human cognition are largely based on evidence from text-based interactions.<n>This study examines whether these patterns depend on communication modality rather than on AI itself.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Concerns that interacting with generative AI homogenizes human cognition are largely based on evidence from text-based interactions, potentially conflating the effects of AI systems with those of written communication. This study examines whether these patterns depend on communication modality rather than on AI itself. Analyzing 957 open-ended debates between university students and a knowledgeable AI adversary, we show that modality corresponds to distinct structural patterns in discourse. Consistent with classic distinctions between orality and literacy, spoken interactions are significantly more verbose and exhibit greater repetition of words and phrases than text-based exchanges. This redundancy, however, is functional: voice users rely on recurrent phrasing to maintain coherence while exploring a wider range of ideas. In contrast, text-based interaction favors concision and refinement but constrains conceptual breadth. These findings suggest that perceived cognitive limitations attributed to generative AI partly reflect the medium through which it is accessed.

Related papers

• When Contextual Inference Fails: Cancelability in Interactive Instruction Following [51.2195840589474]
  We introduce Build What I Mean, an interactive benchmark for contextual meaning construction.<n>In BWIM, models must resolve ambiguity by either performing a contextual inference or requesting clarification at a small communication cost.<n>We observe suboptimal strategies, such as partner-blind over-clarification and question-averse guessing under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T14:46:59Z)
• The Silent Thought: Modeling Internal Cognition in Full-Duplex Spoken Dialogue Models via Latent Reasoning [76.96796481909581]
  Internal cognitive processing is instrumental in formulating high-quality responses.<n>We propose a novel method named FLAIR that conducts latent thinking simultaneously with speech perception.<n>Our approach aligns seamlessly with spoken dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T15:30:29Z)
• What Drives Students' Use of AI Chatbots? Technology Acceptance in Conversational AI [0.17188280334580194]
  We examine how perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use relate to students' behavioral intention to use conversational AI.<n>We find perceived usefulness remains the strongest predictor of students' intention to use conversational AI.<n>Trust and subjective norms significantly influence perceptions of usefulness, while perceived enjoyment exerts both a direct and indirect effect on usage intentions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T05:00:41Z)
• Computational Analysis of Conversation Dynamics through Participant Responsivity [18.116125865284666]
  We develop and evaluate methods for quantifying responsivity.<n>We evaluate both methods against a ground truth set of human-annotated conversations.<n>We then develop conversation-level derived metrics to address various aspects of conversational discourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T23:13:13Z)
• How Real Is AI Tutoring? Comparing Simulated and Human Dialogues in One-on-One Instruction [6.649393350057383]
  This study systematically investigates the structural and behavioral differences between AI-simulated and authentic human tutoring dialogues.<n>Results show that human dialogues are significantly superior to their AI counterparts in utterance length, as well as in questioning (I-Q) and general feedback (F-F) behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T03:18:39Z)
• Conversational DNA: A New Visual Language for Understanding Dialogue Structure in Human and AI [15.417809900388262]
  We introduce Conversational DNA, a novel visual language that treats any dialogue as a living system with interpretable structure.<n>Unlike traditional conversation analysis that reduces rich interaction to statistical summaries, our approach reveals the temporal architecture of dialogue through biological metaphors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T00:43:35Z)
• Aligning Spoken Dialogue Models from User Interactions [55.192134724622235]
  We propose a novel preference alignment framework to improve spoken dialogue models on realtime conversations from user interactions.<n>We create a dataset of more than 150,000 preference pairs from raw multi-turn speech conversations annotated with AI feedback.<n>Our findings shed light on the importance of a well-calibrated balance among various dynamics, crucial for natural real-time speech dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T16:45:20Z)
• Sibyl: Empowering Empathetic Dialogue Generation in Large Language Models via Sensible and Visionary Commonsense Inference [40.96005200292604]
  We present an innovative framework named Sensible and Visionary Commonsense Knowledge (Sibyl)<n>It is designed to concentrate on the immediately succeeding dialogue, aiming to elicit more empathetic responses.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that incorporating our paradigm for acquiring commonsense knowledge into LLMs comprehensively enhances the quality of their responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-26T14:35:23Z)
• Re-mine, Learn and Reason: Exploring the Cross-modal Semantic Correlations for Language-guided HOI detection [57.13665112065285]
  Human-Object Interaction (HOI) detection is a challenging computer vision task. We present a framework that enhances HOI detection by incorporating structured text knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T14:20:52Z)
• Improving Empathetic Dialogue Generation by Dynamically Infusing Commonsense Knowledge [39.536604198392375]
  In empathetic conversations, individuals express their empathy towards others. Previous work has mainly focused on generating empathetic responses by utilizing the speaker's emotion. We propose a novel approach for empathetic response generation, which incorporates an adaptive module for commonsense knowledge selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:25:12Z)
• Channel-aware Decoupling Network for Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension [81.47133615169203]
  We propose compositional learning for holistic interaction across utterances beyond the sequential contextualization from PrLMs. We employ domain-adaptive training strategies to help the model adapt to the dialogue domains. Experimental results show that our method substantially boosts the strong PrLM baselines in four public benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-10T13:18:25Z)
• You Impress Me: Dialogue Generation via Mutual Persona Perception [62.89449096369027]
  The research in cognitive science suggests that understanding is an essential signal for a high-quality chit-chat conversation. Motivated by this, we propose P2 Bot, a transmitter-receiver based framework with the aim of explicitly modeling understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-11T12:51:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.