How Real Is AI Tutoring? Comparing Simulated and Human Dialogues in One-on-One Instruction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01914v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 03:18:39 GMT
• Title: How Real Is AI Tutoring? Comparing Simulated and Human Dialogues in One-on-One Instruction
• Authors: Ruijia Li, Yuan-Hao Jiang, Jiatong Wang, Bo Jiang,
• Abstract summary: This study systematically investigates the structural and behavioral differences between AI-simulated and authentic human tutoring dialogues.<n>Results show that human dialogues are significantly superior to their AI counterparts in utterance length, as well as in questioning (I-Q) and general feedback (F-F) behaviors.
• Score: 6.649393350057383
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Heuristic and scaffolded teacher-student dialogues are widely regarded as critical for fostering students' higher-order thinking and deep learning. However, large language models (LLMs) currently face challenges in generating pedagogically rich interactions. This study systematically investigates the structural and behavioral differences between AI-simulated and authentic human tutoring dialogues. We conducted a quantitative comparison using an Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) coding scheme and Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA). The results show that human dialogues are significantly superior to their AI counterparts in utterance length, as well as in questioning (I-Q) and general feedback (F-F) behaviors. More importantly, ENA results reveal a fundamental divergence in interactional patterns: human dialogues are more cognitively guided and diverse, centered around a "question-factual response-feedback" teaching loop that clearly reflects pedagogical guidance and student-driven thinking; in contrast, simulated dialogues exhibit a pattern of structural simplification and behavioral convergence, revolving around an "explanation-simplistic response" loop that is essentially a simple information transfer between the teacher and student. These findings illuminate key limitations in current AI-generated tutoring and provide empirical guidance for designing and evaluating more pedagogically effective generative educational dialogue systems.

Related papers

• Agentic Conversational Search with Contextualized Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [66.52010873968383]
  We introduce a conversational agent that interleaves search and reasoning across turns, enabling exploratory and adaptive behaviors learned through reinforcement learning (RL) training.<n>The experimental results across four widely used conversational benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T14:55:54Z)
• Beyond Automation: Socratic AI, Epistemic Agency, and the Implications of the Emergence of Orchestrated Multi-Agent Learning Architectures [0.0]
  Generative AI is no longer a peripheral tool in higher education.<n>This paper presents findings from a controlled experiment evaluating a Socratic AI Tutor.<n>Students using the Tutor reported significantly greater support for critical, independent, and reflective thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T07:49:03Z)
• Aligning Spoken Dialogue Models from User Interactions [55.192134724622235]
  We propose a novel preference alignment framework to improve spoken dialogue models on realtime conversations from user interactions.<n>We create a dataset of more than 150,000 preference pairs from raw multi-turn speech conversations annotated with AI feedback.<n>Our findings shed light on the importance of a well-calibrated balance among various dynamics, crucial for natural real-time speech dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T16:45:20Z)
• Towards Actionable Pedagogical Feedback: A Multi-Perspective Analysis of Mathematics Teaching and Tutoring Dialogue [6.13173513227026]
  We propose a multi-perspective discourse analysis that integrates domain-specific talk moves with dialogue act.<n>Our framework may prove helpful for providing human educator feedback, but also aiding in the development of AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T00:48:17Z)
• Contrastive Speaker-Aware Learning for Multi-party Dialogue Generation with LLMs [4.691083532629246]
  Multi-party dialogue generation presents significant challenges due to the complex interplay of multiple speakers and interwoven conversational threads.<n>This paper introduces Speaker-Attentive LLM (SA-LLM), a novel generative model that leverages pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) and a speaker-aware contrastive learning strategy to address these challenges.<n>SA-LLM incorporates a speaker-attributed input encoding and a contrastive learning objective to implicitly learn contextual coherence and speaker roles without explicit relation annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T19:28:12Z)
• Advancing Multi-Party Dialogue Framework with Speaker-ware Contrastive Learning [10.678477576849579]
  We propose Contrastive learning-based Multi-party dialogue Response generation framework.<n>CMR employs a two-stage self-supervised contrastive learning framework.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that CMR not only significantly outperforms state-of-the-art models, but also generalizes well to large pre-trained language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T06:28:22Z)
• DiPlomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoning [89.92601337474954]
  Pragmatic reasoning plays a pivotal role in deciphering implicit meanings that frequently arise in real-life conversations. We introduce a novel challenge, DiPlomat, aiming at benchmarking machines' capabilities on pragmatic reasoning and situated conversational understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T10:41:23Z)
• Opportunities and Challenges in Neural Dialog Tutoring [54.07241332881601]
  We rigorously analyze various generative language models on two dialog tutoring datasets for language learning. We find that although current approaches can model tutoring in constrained learning scenarios, they perform poorly in less constrained scenarios. Our human quality evaluation shows that both models and ground-truth annotations exhibit low performance in terms of equitable tutoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-24T11:00:17Z)
• Ranking Enhanced Dialogue Generation [77.8321855074999]
  How to effectively utilize the dialogue history is a crucial problem in multi-turn dialogue generation. Previous works usually employ various neural network architectures to model the history. This paper proposes a Ranking Enhanced Dialogue generation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-13T01:49:56Z)
• You Impress Me: Dialogue Generation via Mutual Persona Perception [62.89449096369027]
  The research in cognitive science suggests that understanding is an essential signal for a high-quality chit-chat conversation. Motivated by this, we propose P2 Bot, a transmitter-receiver based framework with the aim of explicitly modeling understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-11T12:51:07Z)
• Learning from Easy to Complex: Adaptive Multi-curricula Learning for Neural Dialogue Generation [40.49175137775255]
  Current state-of-the-art neural dialogue systems are mainly data-driven and are trained on human-generated responses. We propose an adaptive multi-curricula learning framework to schedule a committee of the organized curricula.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T03:09:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.