K$α$LOS finds Consensus: A Meta-Algorithm for Evaluating Inter-Annotator Agreement in Complex Vision Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27197v1
• Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:54:05 GMT
• Title: K$α$LOS finds Consensus: A Meta-Algorithm for Evaluating Inter-Annotator Agreement in Complex Vision Tasks
• Abstract summary: We propose K$$LOS, a unified meta-algorithm that generalizes the "Localization First" principle to dataset quality evaluation.<n>By resolving spatial correspondence before assessing agreement, our framework transforms complex-categorical problems into nominal reliability.
• Score: 4.297070083645049
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Progress in object detection benchmarks is stagnating. It is limited not by architectures but by the inability to distinguish model improvements from label noise. To restore trust in benchmarking the field requires rigorous quantification of annotation consistency to ensure the reliability of evaluation data. However, standard statistical metrics fail to handle the instance correspondence problem inherent to vision tasks. Furthermore, validating new agreement metrics remains circular because no objective ground truth for agreement exists. This forces reliance on unverifiable heuristics. We propose K$α$LOS (KALOS), a unified meta-algorithm that generalizes the "Localization First" principle to standardize dataset quality evaluation. By resolving spatial correspondence before assessing agreement, our framework transforms complex spatio-categorical problems into nominal reliability matrices. Unlike prior heuristic implementations, K$α$LOS employs a principled, data-driven configuration; by statistically calibrating the localization parameters to the inherent agreement distribution, it generalizes to diverse tasks ranging from bounding boxes to volumetric segmentation or pose estimation. This standardization enables granular diagnostics beyond a single score. These include annotator vitality, collaboration clustering, and localization sensitivity. To validate this approach, we introduce a novel and empirically derived noise generator. Where prior validations relied on uniform error assumptions, our controllable testbed models complex and non-isotropic human variability. This provides evidence of the metric's properties and establishes K$α$LOS as a robust standard for distinguishing signal from noise in modern computer vision benchmarks.

Related papers

• Conformal Changepoint Localization and Root Cause Analysis with Corrupted Observations [55.76952683833966]
  This paper proposes weighted CONCH (W-CONCH) and weighted CROC (W-CROC) to reduce confidence set size when data may be corrupted.<n>Experiments on image-based and real-world changepoint and root-cause benchmarks show that uncertainty-based weighting substantially reduces confidence set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T05:16:59Z)
• Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation [3.966528468818454]
  This paper presents a standardized workflow for light field QA, developed and deployed in the context of JPEG Pleno standardization activities.<n>The benchmark is designed to encompass not only traditional coding-only artifacts but also distortions that arise in processing pipelines.<n>A hybrid subjective method is proposed enabling fine-grained assessment by combining reference-anchored quality rating with targeted pairwise refinement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-03T17:03:45Z)
• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• Architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header and its application to resolve semantically proximal classification errors with vision transformers [0.0]
  This work presents an architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header that can be integrated into feature extractors such as vision transformers.<n>We also propose a novel metric to capture uncertainty and confidence across misclassification rates, as well as an adaptive arithmetic-mean fusion scheme.<n>Although computational costs increase due to Monte Carlo sampling, the method offers plug-and-play compatibility with pre-trained backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T09:18:06Z)
• Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data [55.84428098924793]
  We propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration.<n>We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance.<n> Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T16:43:28Z)
• The Emergence of Lab-Driven Alignment Signatures: A Psychometric Framework for Auditing Latent Bias and Compounding Risk in Generative AI [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel auditing framework to quantify latent trait estimation under ordinal uncertainty.<n>The research audits nine leading models across dimensions including Optimization Bias, Sycophancy, and Status-Quo Legitimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T06:56:01Z)
• Uncertainty in Federated Granger Causality: From Origins to Systemic Consequences [3.122408196953971]
  Granger Causality (GC) provides a rigorous framework for learning causal structures from time-series data.<n> Federated GC algorithms only yield deterministic point estimates of causality and neglect uncertainty.<n>This paper establishes the first methodology for rigorously quantifying uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T15:12:18Z)
• Beyond Raw Detection Scores: Markov-Informed Calibration for Boosting Machine-Generated Text Detection [105.14032334647932]
  Machine-generated texts (MGTs) pose risks such as disinformation and phishing, highlighting the need for reliable detection.<n> Metric-based methods, which extract statistically distinguishable features of MGTs, are often more practical than complex model-based methods that are prone to overfitting.<n>We propose a Markov-informed score calibration strategy that models two relationships of context detection scores that may aid calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T16:06:12Z)
• CORE: Context-Robust Remasking for Diffusion Language Models [51.59514489363897]
  We propose Context-Robust Remasking (CORE), a training-free framework for inference-time revision.<n>Rather than trusting static token probabilities, CORE identifies context-brittle tokens by probing their sensitivity to targeted masked-context perturbations.<n>On LLaDA-8B-Base, CORE delivers consistent improvements across reasoning and code benchmarks, outperforming compute-matched baselines and improving MBPP by up to 9.2 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T00:12:30Z)
• Distributional Shift-Aware Off-Policy Interval Estimation: A Unified Error Quantification Framework [8.572441599469597]
  We study high-confidence off-policy evaluation in the context of infinite-horizon Markov decision processes. The objective is to establish a confidence interval (CI) for the target policy value using only offline data pre-collected from unknown behavior policies. We show that our algorithm is sample-efficient, error-robust, and provably convergent even in non-linear function approximation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-23T06:35:44Z)
• Disentanglement via Latent Quantization [60.37109712033694]
  In this work, we construct an inductive bias towards encoding to and decoding from an organized latent space. We demonstrate the broad applicability of this approach by adding it to both basic data-re (vanilla autoencoder) and latent-reconstructing (InfoGAN) generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T06:30:29Z)
• Approximate Conditional Coverage via Neural Model Approximations [0.030458514384586396]
  We analyze a data-driven procedure for obtaining empirically reliable approximate conditional coverage. We demonstrate the potential for substantial (and otherwise unknowable) under-coverage with split-conformal alternatives with marginal coverage guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T02:59:05Z)
• Exploiting Sample Uncertainty for Domain Adaptive Person Re-Identification [137.9939571408506]
  We estimate and exploit the credibility of the assigned pseudo-label of each sample to alleviate the influence of noisy labels. Our uncertainty-guided optimization brings significant improvement and achieves the state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T04:09:04Z)
• GenDICE: Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Values [108.17309783125398]
  We show that effective estimation can still be achieved in important applications. Our approach is based on estimating a ratio that corrects for the discrepancy between the stationary and empirical distributions. The resulting algorithm, GenDICE, is straightforward and effective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T00:27:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.