Architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header and its application to resolve semantically proximal classification errors with vision transformers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05908v1
• Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 09:18:06 GMT
• Title: Architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header and its application to resolve semantically proximal classification errors with vision transformers
• Abstract summary: This work presents an architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header that can be integrated into feature extractors such as vision transformers.<n>We also propose a novel metric to capture uncertainty and confidence across misclassification rates, as well as an adaptive arithmetic-mean fusion scheme.<n>Although computational costs increase due to Monte Carlo sampling, the method offers plug-and-play compatibility with pre-trained backbones.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Label noise remains a critical bottleneck for the generalization of supervised deep learning models, particularly when errors are structured rather than random. Standard robust training methods often fail in the presence of such semantically proximal classification errors. This work presents an architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header that can be integrated into feature extractors such as vision transformers, yielding the bi-Lipschitz-constrained Bayesian Vision Transformer (LipB-ViT). In contrast to conventional Bayesian layers, our approach enforces spectral normalization on both the mean and log-variance of the variational weights, which promotes calibrated predictive uncertainty and mitigates noise amplification. We further propose a novel metric to jointly capture uncertainty and confidence across misclassification rates, as well as an adaptive arithmetic-mean fusion scheme that combines feature-space proximity with predictive uncertainty to detect corrupted labels outperforming the state of the art k-nearest neighbor based identification methods by more than 7% reaching a recall of more than 0.93 at 15% semantically misclassified labels. Although computational costs increase due to Monte Carlo sampling, the method offers plug-and-play compatibility with pre-trained backbones and consistent hyperparameters across domains, suggesting strong utility for high-stakes applications with variable annotation reliability. The stabilized confidence estimates serve as the foundation for an analysis pipeline that jointly assesses dataset quality and label noise, yielding a second novel metric for their combined quantification. Lastly, we systematically evaluate LipB-ViT under both structured (adversarial) and unstructured noise at inference time, demonstrating its robustness in realistic high-noise and attack scenarios. We compare its performance against baseline methods.

Related papers

• Improving the Sensitivity of Gravitational Wave Detection with Weighted Conformal Prediction [0.0]
  We use a conformal prediction-based framework to provide statistically rigorous confidence estimates for candidate events.<n>A key challenge is distribution shifts between simulated datasets used for training and the real, unlabelled, observations used for testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-10T11:33:49Z)
• Distribution-Aware Robust Bilevel Optimization: Quantile-Guided Huber Updates in Two-Timescale Stochastic Approximation [16.106678611834102]
  Bilevel optimization (BLO) is fundamental to hierarchical decision-making but suffers from critical instability under heavy-tailed noise.<n>Existing techniques typically rely on magnitude checks, which fail to distinguish informative geometric signals from outliers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-21T10:57:37Z)
• A Semi-Supervised Framework for Speech Confidence Detection using Whisper [3.3994598883947496]
  This paper proposes a semi-supervised hybrid framework that fuses deep semantic embeddings from the Whisper encoder with an interpretable acoustic feature vector.<n>To mitigate reliance on scarce ground truth data, we introduce an Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-Labelling strategy.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves a Macro-F1 score of 0.751, outperforming self-supervised baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T16:50:54Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• Variational Rectification Inference for Learning with Noisy Labels [74.85528327499662]
  We propose variational rectification inference (VRI) to formulate the adaptive rectification for loss functions.<n>VRI is constructed as a hierarchical Bayes by treating the rectifying vector as a latent variable.<n>By introducing the variational term in VRI, the conditional posterior is estimated accurately and avoids collapsing to a Dirac delta function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T01:25:08Z)
• The Emergence of Lab-Driven Alignment Signatures: A Psychometric Framework for Auditing Latent Bias and Compounding Risk in Generative AI [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel auditing framework to quantify latent trait estimation under ordinal uncertainty.<n>The research audits nine leading models across dimensions including Optimization Bias, Sycophancy, and Status-Quo Legitimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T06:56:01Z)
• Geometric Calibration and Neutral Zones for Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Class Classification [0.0]
  This work bridges information geometry and statistical learning, offering formal guarantees for uncertainty-aware classification in applications requiring rigorous validation.<n> Empirical validation on Adeno-Associated Virus classification demonstrates that the two-stage framework captures 72.5% of errors while deferring 34.5% of samples, reducing automated decision error rates from 16.8% to 6.9%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T01:29:49Z)
• Prototype-Guided Pseudo-Labeling with Neighborhood-Aware Consistency for Unsupervised Adaptation [12.829638461740759]
  In unsupervised adaptation for vision-language models such as CLIP, pseudo-labels from zero-shot predictions often exhibit significant noise.<n>We propose a novel adaptive pseudo-labeling framework that enhances CLIP's adaptation performance by integrating prototype consistency and neighborhood-based consistency.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in unsupervised adaptation scenarios, delivering more accurate pseudo-labels while maintaining computational efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T19:08:24Z)
• The Lipschitz-Variance-Margin Tradeoff for Enhanced Randomized Smoothing [85.85160896547698]
  Real-life applications of deep neural networks are hindered by their unsteady predictions when faced with noisy inputs and adversarial attacks. We show how to design an efficient classifier with a certified radius by relying on noise injection into the inputs. Our novel certification procedure allows us to use pre-trained models with randomized smoothing, effectively improving the current certification radius in a zero-shot manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T22:41:47Z)
• Birds of a Feather Trust Together: Knowing When to Trust a Classifier via Adaptive Neighborhood Aggregation [30.34223543030105]
  We show how NeighborAgg can leverage the two essential information via an adaptive neighborhood aggregation. We also extend our approach to the closely related task of mislabel detection and provide a theoretical coverage guarantee to bound the false negative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T18:43:15Z)
• Approximate Conditional Coverage via Neural Model Approximations [0.030458514384586396]
  We analyze a data-driven procedure for obtaining empirically reliable approximate conditional coverage. We demonstrate the potential for substantial (and otherwise unknowable) under-coverage with split-conformal alternatives with marginal coverage guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T02:59:05Z)
• Exploiting Sample Uncertainty for Domain Adaptive Person Re-Identification [137.9939571408506]
  We estimate and exploit the credibility of the assigned pseudo-label of each sample to alleviate the influence of noisy labels. Our uncertainty-guided optimization brings significant improvement and achieves the state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T04:09:04Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Consistency Regularization for Certified Robustness of Smoothed Classifiers [89.72878906950208]
  A recent technique of randomized smoothing has shown that the worst-case $ell$-robustness can be transformed into the average-case robustness. We found that the trade-off between accuracy and certified robustness of smoothed classifiers can be greatly controlled by simply regularizing the prediction consistency over noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T06:57:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.