Heterogeneous Debate Engine: Identity-Grounded Cognitive Architecture for Resilient LLM-Based Ethical Tutoring
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27404v1
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 20:50:21 GMT
- Title: Heterogeneous Debate Engine: Identity-Grounded Cognitive Architecture for Resilient LLM-Based Ethical Tutoring
- Abstract summary: Heterogeneous Debate Engine (HDE) is a cognitive architecture that combines Identity-Grounded Retrieval-Augmented Generation (ID-RAG) for doctrinal fidelity and Heuristic Theory of Mind for strategic opponent modeling.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly used as autonomous agents in complex reasoning tasks, opening the niche for dialectical interactions. However, Multi-Agent systems implemented with systematically unconstrained systems systematically undergo semantic drift and logical deterioration and thus can hardly be used in providing ethical tutoring where a precise answer is required. Current simulation often tends to degenerate into dialectical stagnation, the agents degenerate into recursive concurrence or circular arguments. A critical challenge remains: how to enforce doctrinal fidelity without suppressing the generative flexibility required for dialectical reasoning? To address this niche, we contribute the Heterogeneous Debate Engine (HDE), a cognitive architecture that combines Identity-Grounded Retrieval-Augmented Generation (ID-RAG) for doctrinal fidelity and Heuristic Theory of Mind for strategic opponent modeling. Our evaluation shows that architectural heterogeneity is a crucial variable to stability: contrary doctrinal initializations (e.g., Deontology vs. Utilitarianism) have increased the Argument Complexity Scores of students by an order of magnitude, over baselines. These findings validate the effectiveness of ID-RAG and Heuristic ToM as architectural requirements in maintaining high-fidelity (adversarial) pedagogy.
Related papers
- CogniVerse: Revolutionizing Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Cognitive Reflection and Geometric Reasoning [15.851694572297612]
Multi-modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MMRAG) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing Multimodal Large Language Models.<n>We introduce textbfCogniVerse, a novel MMRAG framework that addresses these challenges through a cognitive-inspired, mathematically rigorous approach.<n>CogniVerse significantly outperforms state-of-the-art systems in both accuracy and coherence, while reducing retrieval latency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T08:40:34Z) - Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z) - Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z) - OMNIFLOW: A Physics-Grounded Multimodal Agent for Generalized Scientific Reasoning [51.33849811496781]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional logical reasoning capabilities but frequently struggle with the continuous dynamics by Partial Differential Equations (PDEs)<n>We propose OMNIFLOW, a multimodal-symbolic architecture designed to ground frozen LLMs in fundamental physical laws without requiring domain-specific parameter updates.<n>We evaluate it on a benchmark spanning microscopic turbulence, theoretical Navier-Stokes, and macroscopic global weather forecasting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-16T18:29:01Z) - A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z) - CoT-Seg: Rethinking Segmentation with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Self-Correction [50.67483317563736]
This paper aims to explore a system that can think step-by-step, look up information if needed, generate results, self-evaluate its own results, and refine the results.<n>We introduce CoT-Seg, a training-free framework that rethinks reasoning segmentation by combining chain-of-thought reasoning with self-correction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-24T11:41:54Z) - Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning based AI tutor for Socratic Interdisciplinary Instruction [21.65910532497379]
We propose ERL4SIIP, a novel Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning (ERL) framework specifically tailored for this domain.<n>ERL4SIIP integrates: (1) a dynamic student simulator grounded in a STEM knowledge graph for latent state modeling; (2) a Hierarchical Reward Mechanism that decomposes long-horizon goals into dense signals; and (3) a LoRA-Division based optimization strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-12T02:51:27Z) - Exploring Syntropic Frameworks in AI Alignment: A Philosophical Investigation [0.0]
I argue that AI alignment should be reconceived as architecting syntropic, reasons-responsive agents through process-based, multi-agent, developmental mechanisms.<n>I articulate the specification trap'' argument demonstrating why content-based value specification appears structurally unstable.<n>I propose syntropy as an information-theoretic framework for understanding multi-agent alignment dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-19T23:31:29Z) - Hybrid Models for Natural Language Reasoning: The Case of Syllogistic Logic [3.421904493396495]
We investigate the logical generalization capabilities of pre-trained large language models (LLMs) using the syllogistic fragment as a benchmark.<n>We propose a hybrid architecture integrating symbolic reasoning with neural computation.<n>Our experiments show that high efficiency is preserved even with relatively small neural components.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T15:27:29Z) - RealUnify: Do Unified Models Truly Benefit from Unification? A Comprehensive Benchmark [71.3555284685426]
We introduce RealUnify, a benchmark designed to evaluate bidirectional capability synergy.<n>RealUnify comprises 1,000 meticulously human-annotated instances spanning 10 categories and 32 subtasks.<n>We find that current unified models still struggle to achieve effective synergy, indicating that architectural unification alone is insufficient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T15:07:28Z) - Simulating Society Requires Simulating Thought [9.879510182473487]
We present a conceptual modeling paradigm, Generative Minds (GenMinds), which draws from cognitive science to support structured belief representations in generative agents.<n>These contributions advance a broader shift: from surface-level mimicry to generative agents that simulate thought, not just language, for social simulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-08T00:59:02Z) - Hierarchical Invariance for Robust and Interpretable Vision Tasks at Larger Scales [54.78115855552886]
We show how to construct over-complete invariants with a Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)-like hierarchical architecture.
With the over-completeness, discriminative features w.r.t. the task can be adaptively formed in a Neural Architecture Search (NAS)-like manner.
For robust and interpretable vision tasks at larger scales, hierarchical invariant representation can be considered as an effective alternative to traditional CNN and invariants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-23T16:50:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.