Decomposing Discrimination: Causal Mediation Analysis for AI-Driven Credit Decisions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27510v1
• Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 04:20:09 GMT
• Title: Decomposing Discrimination: Causal Mediation Analysis for AI-Driven Credit Decisions
• Abstract summary: Statistical fairness metrics in AI-driven credit decisions conflate two causally distinct mechanisms.<n>We formalise this distinction using Pearl's framework of natural direct and indirect effects applied to the credit decision setting.<n>We show that interventional direct and indirect effects (IDE/IIE) are identified under the weaker Modified Sequential Ignorability assumption.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Statistical fairness metrics in AI-driven credit decisions conflate two causally distinct mechanisms: discrimination operating directly from a protected attribute to a credit outcome, and structural inequality propagating through legitimate financial features. We formalise this distinction using Pearl's framework of natural direct and indirect effects applied to the credit decision setting. Our primary theoretical contribution is an identification strategy for natural direct and indirect effects under treatment-induced confounding -- the prevalent setting in which protected attributes causally affect both financial mediators and the final decision, violating standard sequential ignorability. We show that interventional direct and indirect effects (IDE/IIE) are identified under the weaker Modified Sequential Ignorability assumption, and prove that IDE/IIE provide conservative bounds on the unidentified natural effects under monotone indirect treatment response. We propose a doubly-robust augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) estimator for IDE/IIE with semiparametric efficiency properties, implemented via cross-fitting. An E-value sensitivity analysis addresses residual confounding on the direct pathway. Empirical evaluation on 89,465 real HMDA conventional purchase mortgage applications from New York State (2022) demonstrates that approximately 77% of the observed 7.9 percentage-point racial denial disparity operates through financial mediators shaped by structural inequality, while the remaining 23% constitutes a conservative lower bound on direct discrimination. The open-source CausalFair Python package implements the full pipeline for deployment at resource-constrained financial institutions.

Related papers

• Beyond Aggregate Calibration: Decomposing Income-Conditional Recall Disparities in Automated Credit Default Prediction [0.0]
  High-income defaulters are disproportionately classified as label noise relative to low-income defaulters.<n>A 16.86 percentage point gap in true positive rate (recall) between high- and low-income borrowers who ultimately defaulted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T15:57:15Z)
• Effect-Level Validation for Causal Discovery [1.8192444294441061]
  Causal discovery is increasingly applied to large-scale telemetry data to estimate the effects of user-facing interventions.<n>But its reliability for decision-making in feedback-driven systems with strong self-selection remains unclear.<n>We propose an effect-centric, admissibility-first framework that treats discovered graphs as structural hypotheses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T07:26:55Z)
• Structural Gender Bias in Credit Scoring: Proxy Leakage [0.0]
  This study provides a comprehensive audit of structural gender bias within the Taiwan Credit Default dataset.<n>Despite the removal of explicit protected attributes, our results demonstrate that gendered predictive signals remain deeply embedded within non-sensitive features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T10:29:45Z)
• The Eminence in Shadow: Exploiting Feature Boundary Ambiguity for Robust Backdoor Attacks [51.468144272905135]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) underpin critical applications yet remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks.<n>We provide a theoretical analysis targeting backdoor attacks, focusing on how sparse decision boundaries enable disproportionate model manipulation.<n>We propose Eminence, an explainable and robust black-box backdoor framework with provable theoretical guarantees and inherent stealth properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T08:09:07Z)
• Neither Consent nor Property: A Policy Lab for Data Law [4.588656982178105]
  This paper makes the opaque data market in the AI economy empirically legible for the first time.<n>The pipeline begins with multi-year fieldwork to extract the market's hidden logic.<n>It is validated against reality, reproducing observed trade patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T17:27:03Z)
• Partial Identification Approach to Counterfactual Fairness Assessment [50.88100567472179]
  We introduce a Bayesian approach to bound unknown counterfactual fairness measures with high confidence.<n>Our results reveal a positive (spurious) effect on the COMPAS score when changing race to African-American (from all others) and a negative (direct causal) effect when transitioning from young to old age.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T18:35:08Z)
• Intrinsic Meets Extrinsic Fairness: Assessing the Downstream Impact of Bias Mitigation in Large Language Models [11.396244643030983]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit socio-economic biases that can propagate into downstream tasks.<n>We present a unified evaluation framework to compare intrinsic bias mitigation via concept unlearning with extrinsic bias mitigation via counterfactual data augmentation.<n>Our results show that intrinsic bias mitigation through unlearning reduces intrinsic gender bias by up to 94.9%, while also improving downstream task fairness metrics, such as demographic parity by up to 82%, without compromising accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T22:59:55Z)
• Fair Deepfake Detectors Can Generalize [51.21167546843708]
  We show that controlling for confounders (data distribution and model capacity) enables improved generalization via fairness interventions.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose Demographic Attribute-insensitive Intervention Detection (DAID), a plug-and-play framework composed of: i) Demographic-aware data rebalancing, which employs inverse-propensity weighting and subgroup-wise feature normalization to neutralize distributional biases; and ii) Demographic-agnostic feature aggregation, which uses a novel alignment loss to suppress sensitive-attribute signals.<n>DAID consistently achieves superior performance in both fairness and generalization compared to several state-of-the-art
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T14:10:02Z)
• Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspective [58.06306331390586]
  We analyze the tension between fairness and accuracy from a causal lens for the first time.<n>We show that enforcing a causal constraint often reduces the disparity between demographic groups.<n>We introduce a new neural approach for causally-constrained fair learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T11:19:52Z)
• The Impact of Differential Feature Under-reporting on Algorithmic Fairness [86.275300739926]
  We present an analytically tractable model of differential feature under-reporting. We then use to characterize the impact of this kind of data bias on algorithmic fairness. Our results show that, in real world data settings, under-reporting typically leads to increasing disparities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T19:16:22Z)
• Latent Imitator: Generating Natural Individual Discriminatory Instances for Black-Box Fairness Testing [45.183849487268496]
  This paper proposes a framework named Latent Imitator (LIMI) to generate more natural individual discriminatory instances. We first derive a surrogate linear boundary to approximate the decision boundary of the target model. We then manipulate random latent vectors to the surrogate boundary with a one-step movement, and further conduct vector calculation to probe two potential discriminatory candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T11:29:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.