SLOW: Strategic Logical-inference Open Workspace for Cognitive Adaptation in AI Tutoring
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28062v1
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 06:01:16 GMT
- Title: SLOW: Strategic Logical-inference Open Workspace for Cognitive Adaptation in AI Tutoring
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable fluency in educational dialogues.<n>Most generative tutors operate through intuitive, single-pass generation.<n>We propose SLOW, a theory-informed tutoring framework that supports deliberate learner-state reasoning.
- Score: 5.563865143843112
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable fluency in educational dialogues, most generative tutors primarily operate through intuitive, single-pass generation. This reliance on fast thinking precludes a dedicated reasoning workspace, forcing multiple diagnostic and strategic signals to be processed in a conflated manner. As a result, learner cognitive diagnosis, affective perception, and pedagogical decision-making become tightly entangled, which limits the tutoring system's capacity for deliberate instructional adaptation. We propose SLOW, a theory-informed tutoring framework that supports deliberate learner-state reasoning within a transparent decision workspace. Inspired by dual-process accounts of human tutoring, SLOW explicitly separates learner-state inference from instructional action selection. The framework integrates causal evidence parsing from learner language, fuzzy cognitive diagnosis with counterfactual stability analysis, and prospective affective reasoning to anticipate how instructional choices may influence learners' emotional trajectories. These signals are jointly considered to guide pedagogically and affectively aligned tutoring strategies. Evaluation using hybrid human-AI judgments demonstrates significant improvements in personalization, emotional sensitivity, and clarity. Ablation studies further confirm the necessity of each module, showcasing how SLOW enables interpretable and reliable intelligent tutoring through a visualized decision-making process. This work advances the interpretability and educational validity of LLM-based adaptive instruction.
Related papers
- Beyond ID Embeddings: Process-Grounded Language Modeling for Cognitive Diagnosis [77.02066500576528]
Process-aware Language Cognitive Diagnosis (PLCD) framework uses language-derived structures as cognitive priors and response records to calibrate student posterior states.<n>PLCD not only outperforms traditional baselines in predicting student performance but also exhibits strong cognitive transfer capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-11T03:51:20Z) - Conversational Learning Diagnosis via Reasoning Multi-Turn Interactive Learning [16.641654527654246]
ParLD is a preview-analyze-reason framework for conversational learning diagnosis.<n>It uses multi-agent collaboration to diagnose students' cognitive state over multiple dialogue turns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-03T18:29:00Z) - From Co-Design to Metacognitive Laziness: Evaluating Generative AI in Vocational Education [0.0]
This study examines the development and deployment of a Generative AI proof-of-concept (POC) designed to support lecturers in a vocational education setting in Singapore.<n>The POC achieved its primary operational goals: lecturers reported streamlined, reduced cognitive load, and observed improved student confidence in navigating course content.<n>Despite enhanced teaching processes, performance data revealed no significant improvement in overall student assessment outcomes.<n>The study raises consequential design questions regarding how AI tools can be engineered to minimise dependency, metacognitive development, and calibrate support across varying ability levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-13T12:26:25Z) - Decoding Student Minds: Leveraging Conversational Agents for Psychological and Learning Analysis [0.15293427903448018]
This paper presents a psychologically-aware conversational agent designed to enhance both learning performance and emotional well-being in educational settings.<n>The system combines Large Language Models (LLMs), a knowledge graph-enhanced BERT (KG-BERT), and a bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) with attention to classify students' cognitive and affective states in real time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-11T09:06:45Z) - UCO: A Multi-Turn Interactive Reinforcement Learning Method for Adaptive Teaching with Large Language Models [59.693733170193944]
Large language models (LLMs) are shifting from answer providers to intelligent tutors in educational settings.<n>Recent reinforcement learning approaches address this limitation but face two critical challenges.<n>We propose the Unidirectional Cognitive Optimization (UCO) method to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-12T01:27:02Z) - Fast, Slow, and Tool-augmented Thinking for LLMs: A Review [57.16858582049339]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in reasoning across diverse domains.<n>Effective reasoning in real-world tasks requires adapting the reasoning strategy to the demands of the problem.<n>We propose a novel taxonomy of LLM reasoning strategies along two knowledge boundaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-17T07:20:32Z) - Discerning minds or generic tutors? Evaluating instructional guidance capabilities in Socratic LLMs [35.33577525791391]
This study moves beyond question generation to emphasize instructional guidance capability.<n>We propose GuideEval, a benchmark grounded in authentic educational dialogues.<n>We introduce a behavior-guided finetuning strategy that leverages behavior-prompted instructional dialogues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-08T01:02:44Z) - Sentiment Analysis in Learning Management Systems Understanding Student Feedback at Scale [0.0]
The absence of non-verbal communication has led to a reliance on verbal feedback which diminished the efficacy of the educational experience.<n>This paper explores the integration of sentiment analysis into learning management systems (LMS) to bridge the student-teacher's gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T18:13:07Z) - Incentivizing Dual Process Thinking for Efficient Large Language Model Reasoning [75.04643265875072]
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance on complex reasoning tasks, but often suffer from overthinking.<n>Inspired by the dual process theory in cognitive science, we propose Adaptive Cognition Policy Optimization.<n>ACPO enables LRMs to achieve efficient reasoning through adaptive cognitive allocation and dynamic system switch.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T07:15:08Z) - From Problem-Solving to Teaching Problem-Solving: Aligning LLMs with Pedagogy using Reinforcement Learning [82.50157695987558]
Large language models (LLMs) can transform education, but their optimization for direct question-answering often undermines effective pedagogy.<n>We propose an online reinforcement learning (RL)-based alignment framework that can quickly adapt LLMs into effective tutors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T15:00:07Z) - From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for
Coherent Physical Commonsense Reasoning [66.98861219674039]
Heuristic-Analytic Reasoning (HAR) strategies drastically improve the coherence of rationalizations for model decisions.
Our findings suggest that human-like reasoning strategies can effectively improve the coherence and reliability of PLM reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T19:46:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.