Does Claude's Constitution Have a Culture?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28123v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 07:38:46 GMT
• Title: Does Claude's Constitution Have a Culture?
• Abstract summary: We evaluate Claude Sonnet on 55 World Values Survey items, selected for high cross-cultural variance across six value domains.<n>We find that Claude's value profile most closely resembles those of Northern European and Anglophone countries.<n>We discuss the compounding nature of this risk and the need for globally representative constitution-authoring processes.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Constitutional AI (CAI) aligns language models with explicitly stated normative principles, offering a transparent alternative to implicit alignment through human feedback alone. However, because constitutions are authored by specific groups of people, the resulting models may reflect particular cultural perspectives. We investigate this question by evaluating Anthropic's Claude Sonnet on 55 World Values Survey items, selected for high cross-cultural variance across six value domains and administered as both direct survey questions and naturalistic advice-seeking scenarios. Comparing Claude's responses to country-level data from 90 nations, we find that Claude's value profile most closely resembles those of Northern European and Anglophone countries, but on a majority of items extends beyond the range of all surveyed populations. When users provide cultural context, Claude adjusts its rhetorical framing but not its substantive value positions, with effect sizes indistinguishable from zero across all twelve tested countries. An ablation removing the system prompt increases refusals but does not alter the values expressed when responses are given, and replication on a smaller model (Claude Haiku) confirms the same cultural profile across model sizes. These findings suggest that when a constitution is authored within the same cultural tradition that dominates the training data, constitutional alignment may codify existing cultural biases rather than correct them--producing a value floor that surface-level interventions cannot meaningfully shift. We discuss the compounding nature of this risk and the need for globally representative constitution-authoring processes.

Related papers

• DiSCo: A Distribution-First Steering and Cultural Prior Evaluation Framework for Measuring Cultural Preference Bias in LLMs [1.2802720336459552]
  Large language models can systematically favour some cultures over others.<n>Existing benchmarks evaluate accuracy against a single "correct" answer.<n>We proposeo, a distribution-first forced-choice evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T14:40:08Z)
• CCBENCH: Assessing LLM Cultural Competence via Implicitly Signaled Norms using Health Queries [42.15271207948674]
  We introduce CCBENCH, a framework for evaluating cultural competency in large language models (LLMs)<n>As a case study on health, we create CCBENCH-Health, which includes 60 theoretically grounded personas exhibiting varied norm-adherence states across six cultures.<n> Benchmarking five leading models reveals that even the best achieve culturally appropriate responses only 20-30% of the time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T22:52:34Z)
• Whose Norms? Disentangling Cultural and Personal Alignment in Large Language Models [66.34115263472931]
  Large language models are increasingly used for social decision-making situations that require balancing cultural norms with personal preferences.<n>We introduce PACT, the Personal-Preference and Cultural-Norm Trade-off framework, which evaluates whether models choose to follow a cultural norm or allow personal preferences.<n>Our five-country human study on PACT shows that culture-following in humans is mainly driven by scenario country, with the lowest agreement when participants judge their own cultural contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T22:20:30Z)
• Training-Free Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models via Persona Disagreement [7.507356092823674]
  We introduce DISCA, an inference-time method that instantiates each country as a panel of World-Values-Survey-grounded persona agents and converts their disagreement into a bounded, loss-averse logit correction.<n>Our results suggest that inference-time calibration is a scalable alternative to fine-tuning for serving the long tail of global moral preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T16:55:16Z)
• Tears or Cheers? Benchmarking LLMs via Culturally Elicited Distinct Affective Responses [28.3173238194554]
  We introduce CEDAR, a benchmark constructed entirely from scenarios capturing culturally underlinetextscElicited underlinetextscDistinct underlinetextscAffective underlinetextscResponses.<n>The resulting benchmark comprises 10,962 instances across seven languages and 14 fine-grained emotion categories, with each language including 400 multimodal and 1,166 text-only samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T13:04:26Z)
• Identity-Aware Large Language Models require Cultural Reasoning [3.1866496693431934]
  We define cultural reasoning as the capacity of a model to recognise culture-specific knowledge values and social norms.<n>Because culture shapes interpretation, emotional resonance, and acceptable behaviour, cultural reasoning is essential for identity-aware AI.<n>We argue that cultural reasoning must be treated as a foundational capability alongside factual accuracy and linguistic coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T10:50:51Z)
• CultureScope: A Dimensional Lens for Probing Cultural Understanding in LLMs [57.653830744706305]
  CultureScope is the most comprehensive evaluation framework to date for assessing cultural understanding in large language models.<n>Inspired by the cultural iceberg theory, we design a novel dimensional schema for cultural knowledge classification.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our method can effectively evaluate cultural understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T17:47:48Z)
• CAIRe: Cultural Attribution of Images by Retrieval-Augmented Evaluation [61.130639734982395]
  We introduce CAIRe, a novel evaluation metric that assesses the degree of cultural relevance of an image.<n>Our framework grounds entities and concepts in the image to a knowledge base and uses factual information to give independent graded judgments for each culture label.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T17:16:23Z)
• From Surveys to Narratives: Rethinking Cultural Value Adaptation in LLMs [62.9861554207279]
  Adapting cultural values in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents significant challenges.<n>Prior work primarily aligns LLMs with different cultural values using World Values Survey (WVS) data.<n>We investigate WVS-based training for cultural value adaptation and find that relying solely on survey data cane cultural norms and interfere with factual knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:00:01Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
  We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks. We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z)
• Not All Countries Celebrate Thanksgiving: On the Cultural Dominance in Large Language Models [89.94270049334479]
  This paper identifies a cultural dominance issue within large language models (LLMs) LLMs often provide inappropriate English-culture-related answers that are not relevant to the expected culture when users ask in non-English languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T05:38:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.