Whose Norms? Disentangling Cultural and Personal Alignment in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07877v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 22:20:30 GMT
• Title: Whose Norms? Disentangling Cultural and Personal Alignment in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: Large language models are increasingly used for social decision-making situations that require balancing cultural norms with personal preferences.<n>We introduce PACT, the Personal-Preference and Cultural-Norm Trade-off framework, which evaluates whether models choose to follow a cultural norm or allow personal preferences.<n>Our five-country human study on PACT shows that culture-following in humans is mainly driven by scenario country, with the lowest agreement when participants judge their own cultural contexts.
• Score: 66.34115263472931
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used for social decision-making situations that require balancing cultural norms with personal preferences. For example, a user preferring honesty might ask whether to correct a coworker publicly when local norms favor indirect feedback. Yet existing research studies cultural alignment and personalization largely separately. We introduce PACT, the Personal-Preference and Cultural-Norm Trade-off framework, which evaluates whether models choose to follow a cultural norm or allow personal preferences. We find that LLMs vary in how rigidly they enforce cultural norms, with behavior shifted more by country context (7.8%) than age (1%) and gender (0.7%) and shifting non-uniformly after instruction tuning. Furthermore, our five-country human study on PACT shows that culture-following in humans is mainly driven by scenario country, with the lowest agreement when participants judge their own cultural contexts, showing within-culture pluralism. Finally, human-LLM alignment experiments show that models can match majority choices, but fail to capture response distributions and uncertainty (with best correlations reaching only 0.24). Together, these findings motivate alignment evaluations that go beyond majority to capture cultural pluralism and disagreement in social judgment.

Related papers

• DiSCo: A Distribution-First Steering and Cultural Prior Evaluation Framework for Measuring Cultural Preference Bias in LLMs [1.2802720336459552]
  Large language models can systematically favour some cultures over others.<n>Existing benchmarks evaluate accuracy against a single "correct" answer.<n>We proposeo, a distribution-first forced-choice evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T14:40:08Z)
• CCBENCH: Assessing LLM Cultural Competence via Implicitly Signaled Norms using Health Queries [42.15271207948674]
  We introduce CCBENCH, a framework for evaluating cultural competency in large language models (LLMs)<n>As a case study on health, we create CCBENCH-Health, which includes 60 theoretically grounded personas exhibiting varied norm-adherence states across six cultures.<n> Benchmarking five leading models reveals that even the best achieve culturally appropriate responses only 20-30% of the time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T22:52:34Z)
• CultureForest: Understanding and Evaluating Cultural Norm Grounded Reasoning in LLMs [59.09971492475217]
  We introduce CultureForest, a benchmark for textitCultural Norm Grounded Reasoning<n>CultureForest comprises 5,378 examples across 8 domains and 53 countries/regions.<n>Extensive experiments reveal that even top-tier models degrade substantially in open-ended settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T08:25:12Z)
• Identity-Aware Large Language Models require Cultural Reasoning [3.1866496693431934]
  We define cultural reasoning as the capacity of a model to recognise culture-specific knowledge values and social norms.<n>Because culture shapes interpretation, emotional resonance, and acceptable behaviour, cultural reasoning is essential for identity-aware AI.<n>We argue that cultural reasoning must be treated as a foundational capability alongside factual accuracy and linguistic coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T10:50:51Z)
• CAReDiO: Cultural Alignment of LLM via Representativeness and Distinctiveness Guided Data Optimization [50.90288681622152]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) more deeply integrate into human life across various regions.<n>Existing approaches develop culturally aligned LLMs through fine-tuning with culture-specific corpora.<n>We introduce CAReDiO, a novel cultural data construction framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T13:40:13Z)
• CARE: Multilingual Human Preference Learning for Cultural Awareness [48.760262639641496]
  We introduce textbfCARE, a multilingual resource containing 3,490 culturally specific questions and 31.7k responses with human judgments.<n>We demonstrate how a modest amount of high-quality native preferences improves cultural awareness across various LMs.<n>Our analyses reveal that models with stronger initial cultural performance benefit more from alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T14:57:06Z)
• CulturePark: Boosting Cross-cultural Understanding in Large Language Models [63.452948673344395]
  This paper introduces CulturePark, an LLM-powered multi-agent communication framework for cultural data collection. It generates high-quality cross-cultural dialogues encapsulating human beliefs, norms, and customs. We evaluate these models across three downstream tasks: content moderation, cultural alignment, and cultural education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T01:49:02Z)
• NormAd: A Framework for Measuring the Cultural Adaptability of Large Language Models [26.64843536942309]
  Large language models (LLMs) may need to adapt outputs to user values and cultures, not just know about them.<n>We introduce NormAd, an evaluation framework to assess LLMs' cultural adaptability.<n>We create NormAd-Eti, a benchmark of 2.6k situational descriptions representing social-etiquette related cultural norms from 75 countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T18:48:50Z)
• Not All Countries Celebrate Thanksgiving: On the Cultural Dominance in Large Language Models [89.94270049334479]
  This paper identifies a cultural dominance issue within large language models (LLMs) LLMs often provide inappropriate English-culture-related answers that are not relevant to the expected culture when users ask in non-English languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T05:38:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.