ERPO: Token-Level Entropy-Regulated Policy Optimization for Large Reasoning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28204v2
• Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:30:42 GMT
• Title: ERPO: Token-Level Entropy-Regulated Policy Optimization for Large Reasoning Models
• Abstract summary: We show that Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) typically assigns a uniform, sequence-level advantage to all tokens.<n>We propose Entropy-Regulated Policy Optimization (ERPO), which transitions the optimization focus from coarse sequences to fine-grained token dynamics.
• Score: 3.463914032107119
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards has significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models. However, Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) typically assigns a uniform, sequence-level advantage to all tokens, thereby overlooking the intrinsic information heterogeneity along reasoning chains. We show that this coarse-grained credit assignment leads to premature entropy collapse and encourages the model to generate redundant, low-quality reasoning paths. Through systematic empirical analysis, we identify Critical Decision Pivots (CDPs): transient high-entropy states where the policy's trajectory is most sensitive to perturbations. These pivots represent the "forks in the road" where effective multi-path exploration is most crucial yet often suppressed by uniform advantage signals. Building on these insights, we propose Entropy-Regulated Policy Optimization (ERPO), which transitions the optimization focus from coarse sequences to fine-grained token dynamics. ERPO introduces three synergistic components: (i) Entropy-aware Gating, which adaptively amplifies exploration at CDPs to facilitate diverse path discovery; (ii) Bucket-based Implicit Normalization, which mitigates difficulty bias by aligning token progress windows; and (iii) Result-anchored Advantage Synthesis, which re-weights token-level signals via outcome-driven anchors. Extensive experiments on competitive mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that ERPO significantly outperforms GRPO. Notably, ERPO not only boosts reasoning accuracy but also yields significantly more concise and robust derivation paths, while achieving performance comparable to large models with orders of magnitude more parameters.

Related papers

• Reasoning Matters: Mitigate Hallucination in Multimodal Large Reasoning Models via Reasoning-Conditioned Preference Optimization [59.20570719781289]
  Multimodal Large Reasoning Models introduce the reasoning paradigm, demonstrating strong capabilities on complex vision-language tasks.<n>Existing training-based methods typically mitigate hallucinations through response-level direct preference optimization (DPO), where the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and the final answer are treated as a monolithic output and optimized jointly.<n>We derive Reasoning-Conditioned Direct Preference Optimization (RC-DPO), which models the CoT as a condition for answer generation and contrasts the preference for the same preferred answer under different CoT conditions, promoting answer-supportive reasoning chain alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T03:27:23Z)
• Taming the Thinker: Conditional Entropy Shaping for Adaptive LLM Reasoning [63.36243250685778]
  Conditional Entropy Shaping (CES) is a framework that dynamically controls token-level response entropy.<n>CES consistently improves average accuracy while reducing response length relative to DAPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T04:41:51Z)
• Taming Extreme Tokens: Covariance-Aware GRPO with Gaussian-Kernel Advantage Reweighting [35.85110049085719]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization ( GRPO) has emerged as a promising approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>We propose a hyper parameter-free, covariance-weighted optimization method that dynamically down-weights extreme token-level updates.<n>Our approach improves downstream performance across reasoning benchmarks compared with GRPO, and effectively stablizes entropy as training progresses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T05:05:47Z)
• EP-GRPO: Entropy-Progress Aligned Group Relative Policy Optimization with Implicit Process Guidance [3.463914032107119]
  We propose Entropy-Progress Aligned GRPO, a framework that mines the model's intrinsic information flow for dense, self-supervised guidance.<n>EP- GRPO achieves superior accuracy and efficiency compared to GRPO and its variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T14:21:54Z)
• Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data [55.84428098924793]
  We propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration.<n>We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance.<n> Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T16:43:28Z)
• P^2O: Joint Policy and Prompt Optimization [74.45293488495592]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose P2O, a novel framework that synergizes Prompt Optimization with Policy Optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T12:08:47Z)
• Back to Basics: Revisiting Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning via Generative Probabilities [10.235183326885794]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as an indispensable paradigm for enhancing reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We analyze this issue from the perspective of sampling probability dynamics, identifying that the standard objective disproportionately reinforces the highest-likelihood paths.<n>We propose a novel Advantage Re-weighting Mechanism (ARM) designed to equilibrate the confidence levels across all correct responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T04:06:55Z)
• Outcome-Grounded Advantage Reshaping for Fine-Grained Credit Assignment in Mathematical Reasoning [60.00161035836637]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization has emerged as a promising critic-free reinforcement learning paradigm for reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce Outcome-grounded Advantage Reshaping (OAR), a fine-grained credit assignment mechanism that redistributes advantages based on how much each token influences the model's final answer.<n>OAR-G achieves comparable gains with negligible computational overhead, both significantly outperforming a strong GRPO baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T10:48:02Z)
• MAESTRO: Meta-learning Adaptive Estimation of Scalarization Trade-offs for Reward Optimization [56.074760766965085]
  Group-Relative Policy Optimization has emerged as an efficient paradigm for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose MAESTRO, which treats reward scalarization as a dynamic latent policy, leveraging the model's terminal hidden states as a semantic bottleneck.<n>We formulate this as a contextual bandit problem within a bi-level optimization framework, where a lightweight Conductor network co-evolves with the policy by utilizing group-relative advantages as a meta-reward signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T05:02:48Z)
• DaGRPO: Rectifying Gradient Conflict in Reasoning via Distinctiveness-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization [20.66452395111739]
  We propose Distinctiveness-aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (DaGRPO)<n>DaGRPO incorporates two core mechanisms: (1) Sequence-level Gradient Rectification, which utilizes fine-grained scoring to dynamically mask sample pairs with low distinctiveness; and (2) Off-policy Data Augmentation, which introduces high-quality anchors to recover training signals for challenging tasks.<n>In-depth analysis confirms that DaGRPO effectively mitigates gradient explosion and accelerates the emergence of long-chain reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-06T07:51:36Z)
• Beyond High-Entropy Exploration: Correctness-Aware Low-Entropy Segment-Based Advantage Shaping for Reasoning LLMs [6.948242693954442]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a central approach for improving the reasoning ability of large language models.<n>We propose LESS, a correctness-aware reinforcement framework that performs fine-grained advantage modulation over low-entropy segments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T14:19:36Z)
• ARES: Multimodal Adaptive Reasoning via Difficulty-Aware Token-Level Entropy Shaping [54.37497695483689]
  We propose ARES, a unified framework for adaptive reasoning that dynamically allocates exploration effort based on task difficulty.<n>Our approach is motivated by two key empirical findings: (i) while single-token entropy is noisy, high window-entropy (HWE) tokens can reliably capture reasoning-critical moments.<n>In the Adaptive Cold-Start stage, we curate multimodal and textual data paired with reasoning traces of length proportional to problem difficulty, equipping the model with initial difficulty awareness.<n>In the second stage, we develop Adaptive Entropy Policy Optimization (AEPO), which uses HWE tokens as exploration triggers
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:03:28Z)
• Conditional Advantage Estimation for Reinforcement Learning in Large Reasoning Models [50.84995206660551]
  We introduce Conditional advANtage estimatiON (CANON) to amplify the impact of a target metric without presuming its direction.<n>CANON based on entropy consistently outperforms prior methods on both math reasoning and high-complexity logic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T16:33:07Z)
• GTPO and GRPO-S: Token and Sequence-Level Reward Shaping with Policy Entropy [5.691990020513277]
  We propose Dynamic Entropy Weighting, a novel mechanism that facilitates fine-grained rewards through two new algorithms.<n>By repurposing policy entropy for reward shaping, we achieve true per-token credit assignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T11:42:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.