Enhancing User-Feedback Driven Requirements Prioritization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28677v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:58:07 GMT
• Title: Enhancing User-Feedback Driven Requirements Prioritization
• Abstract summary: We enhance ReFeed by shifting the focus of prioritization from treating requirements as independent entities toward interconnecting them.<n>We leverage user feedback from mobile app store to group requirements into topically coherent clusters.<n>Such interconnectedness, in turn, helps to auto-generate additional "requires" relations in candidate requirements.
• Score: 6.358665215744634
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Context: Requirements prioritization is a challenging problem that is aimed to deliver the most suitable subset from a pool of candidate requirements. The problem is NP-hard when formulated as an optimization problem. Feedback from end users can offer valuable support for software evolution, and ReFeed represents a state-of-the-art in automatically inferring a requirement's priority via quantifiable properties of the feedback messages associated with a candidate requirement. Objectives: In this paper, we enhance ReFeed by shifting the focus of prioritization from treating requirements as independent entities toward interconnecting them. Additionally, we explore if interconnecting requirements provides additional value for search-based solutions. Methods: We leverage user feedback from mobile app store to group requirements into topically coherent clusters. Such interconnectedness, in turn, helps to auto-generate additional "requires" relations in candidate requirements. These "requires" pairs are then integrated into a search-based software engineering solution. Results: The experiments on 94 requirements prioritization instances from four real-world software applications show that our enhancement outperforms ReFeed. In addition, we illustrate how incorporating interconnectedness among requirements improves search-based solutions. Conclusion: Our findings show that requirements interconnectedness improves user feedback driven requirements prioritization, helps uncover additional "requires" relations in candidate requirements, and also strengthens search-based release planning.

Related papers

• Ask Before You Optimize: Dynamic Pre-Formulation Clarification for Interactive Optimization [11.777689650316232]
  We introduce OR-Clarify, a benchmark for pre-formulation clarification.<n>We propose Interactive Optimization (InterOPT), a two-stage framework that identifies unresolved formulation-critical gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-04T15:19:38Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models with Searcher Preferences [26.974618053554394]
  We introduce SearchLLM, the first large language model (LLM) for open-ended generative search.<n>We design a hierarchical, multi-dimensional reward system that separates bottom-line constraints.<n> offline evaluations and online A/B tests show improved generation quality and user engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T06:44:30Z)
• Towards Context-aware Reasoning-enhanced Generative Searching in E-commerce [61.03081096959132]
  We propose a context-aware reasoning-enhanced generative search framework for better textbfunderstanding the complicated context.<n>Our approach achieves superior performance compared with strong baselines, validating its effectiveness for search-based recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T16:46:11Z)
• Personalized Reasoning: Just-In-Time Personalization and Why LLMs Fail At It [81.50711040539566]
  Current large language model (LLM) development treats task-solving and preference alignment as separate challenges.<n>We introduce PREFDISCO, an evaluation methodology that transforms static benchmarks into interactive personalization tasks.<n>Our framework creates scenarios where identical questions require different reasoning chains depending on user context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T18:55:28Z)
• Do Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Adapt to Varying User Needs? [28.729041459278587]
  This paper introduces a novel evaluation framework that systematically assesses RALMs under three user need cases.<n>By varying both user instructions and the nature of retrieved information, our approach captures the complexities of real-world applications.<n>Our findings highlight the necessity of user-centric evaluations in the development of retrieval-augmented systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T05:39:38Z)
• IDEAL: Leveraging Infinite and Dynamic Characterizations of Large Language Models for Query-focused Summarization [59.06663981902496]
  Query-focused summarization (QFS) aims to produce summaries that answer particular questions of interest, enabling greater user control and personalization.<n>We investigate two indispensable characteristics that the LLMs-based QFS models should be harnessed, Lengthy Document Summarization and Efficiently Fine-grained Query-LLM Alignment.<n>These innovations pave the way for broader application and accessibility in the field of QFS technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T07:14:56Z)
• QAGCF: Graph Collaborative Filtering for Q&A Recommendation [58.21387109664593]
  Question and answer (Q&A) platforms usually recommend question-answer pairs to meet users' knowledge acquisition needs. This makes user behaviors more complex, and presents two challenges for Q&A recommendation. We introduce Question & Answer Graph Collaborative Filtering (QAGCF), a graph neural network model that creates separate graphs for collaborative and semantic views.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T10:52:37Z)
• Assisted Requirements Selection by Clustering [0.0]
  It is a complex multi-criteria decision process that has been focused by many research works because a balance between business profits and investment is needed. This work studies the combination of the qualitative MoSCoW method and cluster analysis for requirements selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T10:33:44Z)
• Improving Software Requirements Prioritization through the Lens of Constraint Solving [0.0]
  This paper presents an interactive method to requirements prioritization that leverages the pairwise comparisons and a constraint solver. We evaluate the proposed method using the requirements from a real healthcare project.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T17:24:24Z)
• High Quality Related Search Query Suggestions using Deep Reinforcement Learning [0.15229257192293202]
  "High Quality Related Search Query Suggestions" task aims at recommending search queries which are real, accurate, diverse, relevant and engaging. We train a Deep Reinforcement Learning model to predict the query a user would enter next. The reward signal is composed of long-term session-based user feedback, syntactic relatedness and estimated naturalness of generated query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-10T05:22:32Z)
• AI Techniques for Software Requirements Prioritization [91.3755431537592]
  The prioritization approaches discussed in this paper are based on different Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques that can help to improve the overall quality of requirements prioritization processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-02T12:43:00Z)
• Session-Aware Query Auto-completion using Extreme Multi-label Ranking [61.753713147852125]
  We take the novel approach of modeling session-aware query auto-completion as an e Multi-Xtreme Ranking (XMR) problem. We adapt a popular XMR algorithm for this purpose by proposing several modifications to the key steps in the algorithm. Our approach meets the stringent latency requirements for auto-complete systems while leveraging session information in making suggestions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-09T17:56:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.