Towards Explainable Stakeholder-Aware Requirements Prioritisation in Aged-Care Digital Health
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29114v1
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 01:03:42 GMT
- Title: Towards Explainable Stakeholder-Aware Requirements Prioritisation in Aged-Care Digital Health
- Abstract summary: Knowing which human aspects matter most, and for whom, is critical for inclusive and evidence-based requirements prioritisation.<n>We applied an explainable machine learning to identify the human aspects most strongly associated with requirement priorities across 8 aged-care digital health themes.<n>The results show that human-centric requirements analysis should engage stakeholder groups explicitly rather than collapsing their perspectives into a single aggregate view.
- Score: 4.640647592836271
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Requirements engineering for aged-care digital health must account for human aspects, because requirement priorities are shaped not only by technical functionality but also by stakeholders' health conditions, socioeconomics, and lived experience. Knowing which human aspects matter most, and for whom, is critical for inclusive and evidence-based requirements prioritisation. Yet in practice, while some studies have examined human aspects in RE, they have largely relied on expert judgement or model-driven analysis rather than large-scale user studies with meaningful human-in-the-loop validation to determine which aspects matter most and why. To address this gap, we conducted a mixed-methods study with 103 older adults, 105 developers, and 41 caregivers. We first applied an explainable machine learning to identify the human aspects most strongly associated with requirement priorities across 8 aged-care digital health themes, and then conducted 12 semi-structured interviews to validate and interpret the quantitative patterns. The results identify the key human aspects shaping requirement priorities, reveal their directional effects, and expose substantial misalignment across stakeholder groups. Together, these findings show that human-centric requirements analysis should engage stakeholder groups explicitly rather than collapsing their perspectives into a single aggregate view. This paper contributes an identification of the key human aspects driving requirement priorities in aged-care digital health and an explainable, human-centric RE framework that combines ML-derived importance rankings with qualitative validation to surface the stakeholder misalignments that inclusive requirements engineering must address.
Related papers
- HM-Req: A Framework for Embedding Values within CPS Human Monitoring Requirements [4.120304367653955]
HM-Req is a novel requirements elicitation framework including a Controlled Natural Language (CNL) for defining human monitoring requirements.<n>These requirements are augmented with human values from relevant stakeholders and integrated into a Value Dashboard to detect potential conflicts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T13:15:39Z) - Requirements Perception Gap across Stakeholders: A Comparative Survey of Aged Care Digital Health Software [4.640647592836271]
Three key stakeholder groups: older adults, caregivers and digital health software developers on key functional and non-functional requirements.<n>We conducted a survey to gather and analyse data related to the three stakeholder groups' (dis)satisfaction with current aged care digital health software.<n>We found developers tend to prioritise advanced features and functional requirements, significantly overestimating user satisfaction with core NFRs.<n>Our findings can guide future co-design processes, near-term product decisions, and privacy-by-design recommendations in aged care digital health.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-16T05:39:08Z) - Human-MME: A Holistic Evaluation Benchmark for Human-Centric Multimodal Large Language Models [118.44328586173556]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant advances in visual understanding tasks.<n>Human-MME is a curated benchmark designed to provide a more holistic evaluation of MLLMs in human-centric scene understanding.<n>Our benchmark extends the single-target understanding to the multi-person and multi-image mutual understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T12:20:57Z) - HumanPCR: Probing MLLM Capabilities in Diverse Human-Centric Scenes [72.26829188852139]
HumanPCR is an evaluation suite for probing MLLMs' capacity about human-related visual contexts.<n>Human-P, HumanThought-C, and Human-R feature over 6,000 human-verified multiple choice questions.<n>Human-R offers a challenging manually curated video reasoning test.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-19T09:52:04Z) - Preference Learning for AI Alignment: a Causal Perspective [55.2480439325792]
We frame this problem in a causal paradigm, providing the rich toolbox of causality to identify persistent challenges.<n>Inheriting from the literature of causal inference, we identify key assumptions necessary for reliable generalisation.<n>We illustrate failure modes of naive reward models and demonstrate how causally-inspired approaches can improve model robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T10:45:42Z) - Patients Speak, AI Listens: LLM-based Analysis of Online Reviews Uncovers Key Drivers for Urgent Care Satisfaction [26.391629320279904]
This study collects Google Maps reviews across the DMV and Florida areas.<n>We first analyze the geospatial patterns of various aspects, including population density, median income, GINI Index, rent-to-income ratio, household below poverty rate, no insurance rate, and unemployment rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-26T20:45:01Z) - Human-Centric NLP or AI-Centric Illusion?: A Critical Investigation [0.0]
This study identifies a significant gap between the ideas of human-centricity and actual practices.<n>The paper advocates for a redefinition of Human-Centric NLP, urging a broader focus on real-world utility and societal implications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-14T19:16:53Z) - Requirements Engineering for Older Adult Digital Health Software: A Systematic Literature Review [2.7992435001846827]
Growth of the older adult population has led to an increasing interest in technology-supported aged care.
Digital health can be important in supporting older adults wellbeing, emotional requirements, and social needs.
There is a gap in the understanding between developers and ageing people of their requirements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T04:35:39Z) - ConSiDERS-The-Human Evaluation Framework: Rethinking Human Evaluation for Generative Large Language Models [53.00812898384698]
We argue that human evaluation of generative large language models (LLMs) should be a multidisciplinary undertaking.
We highlight how cognitive biases can conflate fluent information and truthfulness, and how cognitive uncertainty affects the reliability of rating scores such as Likert.
We propose the ConSiDERS-The-Human evaluation framework consisting of 6 pillars -- Consistency, Scoring Criteria, Differentiating, User Experience, Responsible, and Scalability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T22:45:28Z) - Human Body Pose Estimation for Gait Identification: A Comprehensive
Survey of Datasets and Models [4.17510581764131]
Person identification is a problem that has received substantial attention, particularly in security domains.
There are several review studies addressing person identification such as the utilization of facial images, silhouette images, and wearable sensor.
Despite skeleton-based person identification gaining popularity while overcoming the challenges of traditional approaches, existing survey studies lack the comprehensive review of skeleton-based approaches to gait identification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T07:30:00Z) - UniHCP: A Unified Model for Human-Centric Perceptions [75.38263862084641]
We propose a Unified Model for Human-Centric Perceptions (UniHCP)
UniHCP unifies a wide range of human-centric tasks in a simplified end-to-end manner with the plain vision transformer architecture.
With large-scale joint training on 33 human-centric datasets, UniHCP can outperform strong baselines by direct evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-06T07:10:07Z) - A Survey on Computer Vision based Human Analysis in the COVID-19 Era [58.79053747159797]
The emergence of COVID-19 has had a global and profound impact, not only on society as a whole, but also on the lives of individuals.
Various prevention measures were introduced around the world to limit the transmission of the disease, including face masks, mandates for social distancing and regular disinfection in public spaces, and the use of screening applications.
These developments triggered the need for novel and improved computer vision techniques capable of (i) providing support to the prevention measures through an automated analysis of visual data, on the one hand, and (ii) facilitating normal operation of existing vision-based services, such as biometric authentication
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-07T17:20:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.