Same Rules, Mixed Messages: Exploring Community Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in Computing Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29762v1
• Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:02:44 GMT
• Title: Same Rules, Mixed Messages: Exploring Community Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in Computing Education
• Abstract summary: Academic dishonesty has long been a concern in computing education.<n>This study examined how different actors in the computer science classroom interpret potential cheating scenarios.<n>Instructors most often attribute cheating to grade pressure and laziness, while students and TAs emphasize gaps in prerequisite knowledge and time management challenges.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Academic dishonesty has long been a concern in computing education, and the rapid growth of online learning and generative artificial intelligence (AI) has further complicated how cheating is perceived and addressed. We report on a study examining how different actors in the computer science (CS) classroom interpret potential cheating scenarios and the motivations behind academic dishonesty. Participants included instructors (n = 6), teaching assistants (TAs; n = 21), and undergraduate students (n = 538) enrolled in two CS courses at a large Southeastern institution in the United States. Respondents classified scenarios as serious cheating, trivial cheating, or not cheating and answered to an open-ended question about motivations for academic dishonesty. Our findings reveal notable discrepancies across groups: instructors most often attribute cheating to grade pressure and laziness, while students and TAs emphasize gaps in prerequisite knowledge and time management challenges. These results highlight misaligned perceptions of academic dishonesty and underscore the need for clearer communication and curricular strategies in computing education, particularly in post-COVID learning environments where hybrid instruction, increased reliance on digital resources, and AI-assisted tools have reshaped students' approaches to coursework and learning.

Related papers

• Beyond Detection: Redesigning Assessment and Governande of Generative AI at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) [39.92037610044293]
  Most institutions frame the debate around AI detection, plagiarism, academic integrity and a presumed drop in student effort as defensive.<n>Other group of pioneering universities is pursuing deeper adoption, and assuming that any policy built on prevention or sanction will not hold.<n>What universities need instead is a coordinated effort to set clear, course-by-course rules for GenAI use.<n>UPM is developing a strategic and sustainable AI policy and adoption framework structured around six dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T18:04:50Z)
• Reshaping Undergraduate Computer Science Education in the Generative AI Era [85.78707817763434]
  Generative AI represents a turning point for Computer Science (CS) education.<n>To keep pace with advances in AI technology, CS curricula should consider a shift toward understanding and verifying AI-generated artifacts.<n>We believe that to effectively prepare future computer science graduates, capable of creating, solving problems, and managing, as well as co-creating, artifacts with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T05:26:24Z)
• Group-Differentiated Discourse on Generative AI in High School Education: A Case Study of Reddit Communities [12.603101932945995]
  We study how different Reddit communities discuss generative AI in high school education.<n>Using 3,789 posts from five education-related subreddits, we compare student, teacher, and mixed communities.<n>Teachers are more likely to articulate explicit pedagogical trade-offs, simultaneously framing AI as both beneficial and harmful for learning.<n>Students more often discuss AI tactically in relation to accusations, grades, and enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T03:06:21Z)
• Exploring the Use of ChatGPT by Computer Science Students in Software Development: Applications, Ethical Considerations, and Insights for Engineering Education [0.0]
  ChatGPT has been increasingly used in computer science, offering efficient support across software development tasks.<n>Prior research has largely relied on surveys, emphasizing trends over in-depth analysis of students' strategies and ethical awareness.<n>This study investigates how computer science students strategically and ethically engage with ChatGPT in software development projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T23:54:08Z)
• Assessing the Prevalence of AI-assisted Cheating in Programming Courses: A Pilot Study [0.0]
  Tools that can generate computer code in response to inputs written in natural language pose an existential threat to Computer Science education.<n>We conducted a pilot study in a large Computer Science class to assess the feasibility of estimating AI plagiarism through anonymous surveys and interviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T22:40:44Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Sports: Insights from a Quantitative Survey among Sports Students in Germany about their Perceptions, Expectations, and Concerns regarding the Use of AI Tools [0.0]
  The manuscript presents findings from a quantitative survey conducted among sports students of all semesters in Germany.<n>Students express confidence that the proliferation of AI will not compromise their critical thinking skills.<n>Students have concerns about plagiarism, lecturer preparedness and their own skills and future skill development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T05:37:53Z)
• Effects of a Prompt Engineering Intervention on Undergraduate Students' AI Self-Efficacy, AI Knowledge and Prompt Engineering Ability: A Mixed Methods Study [36.48421439947282]
  This study designed and implemented a prompt engineering intervention at a university in Hong Kong. It examined students' AI self-efficacy, AI knowledge, and proficiency in creating effective prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T15:05:24Z)
• CourseAssist: Pedagogically Appropriate AI Tutor for Computer Science Education [1.052788652996288]
  This poster introduces CourseAssist, a novel LLM-based tutoring system tailored for computer science education. Unlike generic LLM systems, CourseAssist uses retrieval-augmented generation, user intent classification, and question decomposition to align AI responses with specific course materials and learning objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T20:43:06Z)
• AGI: Artificial General Intelligence for Education [41.45039606933712]
  This position paper reviews artificial general intelligence (AGI)'s key concepts, capabilities, scope, and potential within future education. It highlights that AGI can significantly improve intelligent tutoring systems, educational assessment, and evaluation procedures. The paper emphasizes that AGI's capabilities extend to understanding human emotions and social interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T22:31:59Z)
• Towards Skilled Population Curriculum for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [42.540853953923495]
  We introduce a novel automatic curriculum learning framework, Skilled Population Curriculum (SPC), which adapts curriculum learning to multi-agent coordination. Specifically, we endow the student with population-invariant communication and a hierarchical skill set, allowing it to learn cooperation and behavior skills from distinct tasks with varying numbers of agents. We also analyze the inherent non-stationarity of this multi-agent automatic curriculum teaching problem and provide a corresponding regret bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T12:30:52Z)
• Disadvantaged students increase their academic performance through collective intelligence exposure in emergency remote learning due to COVID 19 [105.54048699217668]
  During the COVID-19 crisis, educational institutions worldwide shifted from face-to-face instruction to emergency remote teaching (ERT) modalities. We analyzed data on 7,528 undergraduate students and found that cooperative and consensus dynamics among students in discussion forums positively affect their final GPA. Using natural language processing, we show that first-year students with low academic performance during high school are exposed to more content-intensive posts in discussion forums.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T20:23:38Z)
• Neural Language Models are Effective Plagiarists [38.85940137464184]
  We find that a student using GPT-J can complete introductory level programming assignments without triggering suspicion from MOSS. GPT-J was not trained on the problems in question and is not provided with any examples to work from. We conclude that the code written by GPT-J is diverse in structure, lacking any particular tells that future plagiarism detection techniques may use to try to identify algorithmically generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-19T04:00:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.