VeriAct: Beyond Verifiability -- Agentic Synthesis of Correct and Complete Formal Specifications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00280v1
• Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 22:12:15 GMT
• Title: VeriAct: Beyond Verifiability -- Agentic Synthesis of Correct and Complete Formal Specifications
• Abstract summary: We compare classical and prompt-based approaches for automated JML specification synthesis.<n>We investigate whether prompt optimization can push synthesis quality further by evolving prompts through structured verification feedback.<n>We propose VeriAct, a verification-guided agentic framework that iteratively synthesizes and repairs specifications.
• Score: 0.3240750198587795
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Formal specifications play a central role in ensuring software reliability and correctness. However, automatically synthesizing high-quality formal specifications remains a challenging task, often requiring domain expertise. Recent work has applied large language models to generate specifications in Java Modeling Language (JML), reporting high verification pass rates. But does passing a verifier mean that the specification is actually correct and complete? In this work, we first conduct a comprehensive evaluation comparing classical and prompt-based approaches for automated JML specification synthesis. We then investigate whether prompt optimization can push synthesis quality further by evolving prompts through structured verification feedback. While optimization improves verifier pass rates, we find a clear performance ceiling. More critically, we propose Spec-Harness, an evaluation framework that measures specification correctness and completeness through symbolic verification, revealing that a large fraction of verifier-accepted specifications, including optimized ones, are in fact incorrect or incomplete, over- or under-constraining both inputs and outputs in ways invisible to the verifier. To push beyond this ceiling, we propose VeriAct, a verification-guided agentic framework that iteratively synthesizes and repairs specifications through a closed loop of LLM-driven planning, code execution, verification, and Spec-Harness feedback. Our experiments on two benchmark datasets show that VeriAct outperforms both prompt-based and prompt-optimized baselines, producing specifications that are not only verifiable but also correct and complete.

Related papers

• SkillForge: Compositional Skill Synthesis with Verification-in-the-Loop for Generating Formally Verified Dafny Programs [10.916179875278326]
  We introduce SKILLFORGE, a framework that decomposes formal code synthesis into a library of atomic, reusable skills.<n>A verification-driven harness orchestrates these skills.<n>On a curated benchmark of natural language to Dafny specification pairs, SKILLFORGE substantially outperforms both state-of-the-art agentic approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-30T15:15:00Z)
• How Powerful are LLMs in Generating Formal Program Specifications? [20.791968710071973]
  Coins is an evaluation framework that assesses specification quality by instantiating specifications under evaluation on trusted test cases and generating concrete proof obligations.<n>We conduct a large scale study on HumanEval with a curated set of human written Rocq specifications.<n>Our results show that specification generation remains a formidable challenge, and that verification complexity can obscure genuine differences in specification quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-13T10:45:18Z)
• ClarifyCodeBench: Evaluating LLMs on Clarifying Ambiguous Requirements for Code Generation [54.788849448970154]
  We introduce ClarifyCodeBench, a novel interactive benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' capability in resolving requirement ambiguity.<n>We conduct a systematic evaluation of six state-of-the-art LLMs using ClarifyCodeBench.<n>Our empirical results yield three critical insights: 1) Capability Decoupling: Strong code generation performance does not inherently translate to effective requirement clarification; 2) The Reasoning Paradox: While increased computational thinking enhances code correctness, it yields marginal gains in identifying ambiguities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T09:58:59Z)
• LiveFMBench: Unveiling the Power and Limits of Agentic Workflows in Specification Generation [75.05397479715576]
  Large language models (LLMs) and agents have shown promising progress, but their true capabilities and failure modes remain unclear.<n>We present the first systematic and contamination-aware study of LLM- and agent-based formal specification generation for C programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T11:31:33Z)
• SpecSyn: LLM-based Synthesis and Refinement of Formal Specifications for Real-world Program Verification [10.586396714718457]
  SpecSyn is a novel LLM-based specification generation method.<n>In experiments, SpecSyn maintains high precision over 90% and outstanding recall over 75%.<n>In further evaluations, SpecSyn successfully handles 1071 out of 1365 target properties for open-source programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T11:46:19Z)
• Certified Program Synthesis with a Multi-Modal Verifier [5.998029529040967]
  LeetProof is an agentic pipeline built on Velvet, a multi-modal verifier embedded in Lean.<n>It combines dynamic validation, automated proofs, and interactive proof scripting in one foundational framework.<n>We evaluate LeetProof on benchmarks derived from prior work on certified synthesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T14:56:45Z)
• InFi-Check: Interpretable and Fine-Grained Fact-Checking of LLMs [48.98720183285795]
  InFi-Check is a framework for interpretable and fine-grained fact-checking of large language models.<n>InFi-Checker provides supporting evidence, classify fine-grained error types, and produce justifications along with corrections.<n>Experiments show that InFi-Checker achieves state-of-the-art performance on InFi-Check-FG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T20:00:17Z)
• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• AssertCoder: LLM-Based Assertion Generation via Multimodal Specification Extraction [32.14733357890831]
  We propose AssertCoder, a novel unified framework that automatically generates high-quality SVAs.<n>AssertCoder employs a modality-sensitive preprocessing to parse heterogeneous specification formats.<n>The framework incorporates a mutation-based evaluation approach to assess assertion quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T14:43:14Z)
• VerifyThisBench: Generating Code, Specifications, and Proofs All at Once [9.383313869205628]
  We introduce a new benchmark that evaluates end-to-end program verification from natural language descriptions.<n>Our evaluation reveals that even state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, such as o3-mini, achieve a pass rate of less than 4%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T19:00:52Z)
• FactLens: Benchmarking Fine-Grained Fact Verification [6.814173254027381]
  We advocate for a shift towards fine-grained verification, where complex claims are broken down into smaller sub-claims for individual verification.<n>We introduce FactLens, a benchmark for evaluating fine-grained fact verification, with metrics and automated evaluators of sub-claim quality.<n>Our results show alignment between automated FactLens evaluators and human judgments, and we discuss the impact of sub-claim characteristics on the overall verification performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T21:26:57Z)
• OpenFactCheck: Building, Benchmarking Customized Fact-Checking Systems and Evaluating the Factuality of Claims and LLMs [59.836774258359945]
  OpenFactCheck is a framework for building customized automatic fact-checking systems.<n>It allows users to easily customize an automatic fact-checker and verify the factual correctness of documents and claims.<n>CheckerEVAL is a solution for gauging the reliability of automatic fact-checkers' verification results using human-annotated datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T07:15:19Z)
• Factcheck-Bench: Fine-Grained Evaluation Benchmark for Automatic Fact-checkers [121.53749383203792]
  We present a holistic end-to-end solution for annotating the factuality of large language models (LLMs)-generated responses. We construct an open-domain document-level factuality benchmark in three-level granularity: claim, sentence and document. Preliminary experiments show that FacTool, FactScore and Perplexity are struggling to identify false claims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T14:41:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.