Certified Program Synthesis with a Multi-Modal Verifier

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16584v1
• Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:56:45 GMT
• Title: Certified Program Synthesis with a Multi-Modal Verifier
• Abstract summary: LeetProof is an agentic pipeline built on Velvet, a multi-modal verifier embedded in Lean.<n>It combines dynamic validation, automated proofs, and interactive proof scripting in one foundational framework.<n>We evaluate LeetProof on benchmarks derived from prior work on certified synthesis.
• Score: 5.998029529040967
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Certified program synthesis (aka vericoding) is the process of automatically generating a program, its formal specification, and a machine-checkable proof of their alignment from a natural-language description. Two challenges make vericoding difficult. First, specifications synthesised from natural language are often either too weak to be meaningful or too strong to be implementable, yet existing approaches lack systematic means to detect such defects. Second, the landscape of program verifiers is fragmented: each tool supports a particular reasoning mode -- auto-active (e.g., Dafny, Verus) or interactive (e.g., Coq, Lean) -- with its own trade-off between automation and expressivity. This forces every synthesis methodology to be tailored to a single verification paradigm, limiting the class of tasks it can handle effectively. We overcome both challenges by structuring the certified synthesis workflow around a multi-modal verifier -- a single tool combining dynamic validation, automated proofs, and interactive proof scripting in one foundational framework. We realise this idea in LeetProof, an agentic pipeline built on Velvet, a multi-modal verifier embedded in Lean. Multi-modality enables LeetProof to validate generated specifications via randomised property-based testing before any code is synthesised, decompose the synthesis task into sub-problems guided by verification conditions, and delegate residual proof obligations to frontier AI provers specialised for Lean. We evaluate LeetProof on benchmarks derived from prior work on certified synthesis. Our specification validation uncovers defects in existing reference benchmarks, and LeetProof's staged pipeline achieves a significantly higher rate of fully certified solutions than a single-mode baseline at the same budget -- consistently across two frontier LLM backends.

Related papers

• SkillForge: Compositional Skill Synthesis with Verification-in-the-Loop for Generating Formally Verified Dafny Programs [10.916179875278326]
  We introduce SKILLFORGE, a framework that decomposes formal code synthesis into a library of atomic, reusable skills.<n>A verification-driven harness orchestrates these skills.<n>On a curated benchmark of natural language to Dafny specification pairs, SKILLFORGE substantially outperforms both state-of-the-art agentic approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-30T15:15:00Z)
• Towards Automated Formal Verification of zkEVMs Using LLM-Guided Constraint Synthesis [14.825615940318038]
  ZkEVMs generate zero-knowledge that guarantee off-chain execution correctness.<n> subtle implementation bugs can lead to valid proofs certifying semantically faulty states.<n>Formal verification via SMT solvers can prevent this, but is bottlenecked by specification.<n>We propose Veri Synth, a framework that synthesizes executable Python/Z3 verification models from Rust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-22T06:20:36Z)
• ClarifyCodeBench: Evaluating LLMs on Clarifying Ambiguous Requirements for Code Generation [54.788849448970154]
  We introduce ClarifyCodeBench, a novel interactive benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' capability in resolving requirement ambiguity.<n>We conduct a systematic evaluation of six state-of-the-art LLMs using ClarifyCodeBench.<n>Our empirical results yield three critical insights: 1) Capability Decoupling: Strong code generation performance does not inherently translate to effective requirement clarification; 2) The Reasoning Paradox: While increased computational thinking enhances code correctness, it yields marginal gains in identifying ambiguities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T09:58:59Z)
• VeriAct: Beyond Verifiability -- Agentic Synthesis of Correct and Complete Formal Specifications [0.3240750198587795]
  We compare classical and prompt-based approaches for automated JML specification synthesis.<n>We investigate whether prompt optimization can push synthesis quality further by evolving prompts through structured verification feedback.<n>We propose VeriAct, a verification-guided agentic framework that iteratively synthesizes and repairs specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T22:12:15Z)
• Training LLMs for Multi-Step Tool Orchestration with Constrained Data Synthesis and Graduated Rewards [76.49428173793386]
  LLMs must invoke multiple dependent APIs in the correct order while propagating intermediate outputs.<n>Training models to handle such faces two obstacles: existing environments focus on simple per-turn function calls with simulated data, and binary rewards.<n>We present a framework addressing both challenges. First, we construct a reinforcement learning environment backed by a large-scale cache of real API responses, enabling a data synthesis pipeline that samples valid multi-step orchestration traces.<n>Second, we propose a graduated reward design that decomposes correctness into atomic validity and orchestration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T18:31:39Z)
• Veri-Sure: A Contract-Aware Multi-Agent Framework with Temporal Tracing and Formal Verification for Correct RTL Code Generation [4.723302382132762]
  silicon-grade correctness remains bottlenecked by: (i) limited test coverage and reliability of simulation-centric evaluation, (ii) regressions and repair hallucinations, and (iii) semantic drift as intent is reinterpreted across agent handoffs.<n>We propose Veri-Sure, a multi-agent framework that establishes a design contract to align agents' intent and uses a patching mechanism guided by static dependency slicing to perform precise, localized repairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T16:10:23Z)
• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• AssertCoder: LLM-Based Assertion Generation via Multimodal Specification Extraction [32.14733357890831]
  We propose AssertCoder, a novel unified framework that automatically generates high-quality SVAs.<n>AssertCoder employs a modality-sensitive preprocessing to parse heterogeneous specification formats.<n>The framework incorporates a mutation-based evaluation approach to assess assertion quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T14:43:14Z)
• Training Language Models to Generate Quality Code with Program Analysis Feedback [66.0854002147103]
  Code generation with large language models (LLMs) is increasingly adopted in production but fails to ensure code quality.<n>We propose REAL, a reinforcement learning framework that incentivizes LLMs to generate production-quality code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:57:47Z)
• VerifyThisBench: Generating Code, Specifications, and Proofs All at Once [9.383313869205628]
  We introduce a new benchmark that evaluates end-to-end program verification from natural language descriptions.<n>Our evaluation reveals that even state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, such as o3-mini, achieve a pass rate of less than 4%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T19:00:52Z)
• Localizing Factual Inconsistencies in Attributable Text Generation [74.11403803488643]
  We introduce QASemConsistency, a new formalism for localizing factual inconsistencies in attributable text generation.<n>We show that QASemConsistency yields factual consistency scores that correlate well with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T22:53:48Z)
• Enchanting Program Specification Synthesis by Large Language Models using Static Analysis and Program Verification [15.686651364655958]
  AutoSpec is an automated approach to synthesize specifications for automated program verification. It overcomes the shortcomings of existing work in specification versatility, synthesizing satisfiable and adequate specifications for full proof. It can be successfully applied to verify the programs in a real-world X509-parser project.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T18:15:49Z)
• A General Framework for Verification and Control of Dynamical Models via Certificate Synthesis [54.959571890098786]
  We provide a framework to encode system specifications and define corresponding certificates. We present an automated approach to formally synthesise controllers and certificates. Our approach contributes to the broad field of safe learning for control, exploiting the flexibility of neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T09:37:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.