Locally Confident, Globally Stuck: The Quality-Exploration Dilemma in Diffusion Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00375v1
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 02:01:30 GMT
- Title: Locally Confident, Globally Stuck: The Quality-Exploration Dilemma in Diffusion Language Models
- Abstract summary: We show that low-confidence remasking improves a proxy for quality while constraining the entropy of the induced sequence distribution.<n>We develop a simple Independent--Hastings sampler that approximately targets this distribution during decoding.
- Score: 52.61023005303122
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) theoretically permit token decoding in arbitrary order, a flexibility that could enable richer exploration of reasoning paths than autoregressive (AR) LLMs. In practice, however, random-order decoding often hurts generation quality. To mitigate this, low-confidence remasking improves single-sample quality (e.g., Pass@$1$) by prioritizing confident tokens, but it also suppresses exploration and limits multi-sample gains (e.g., Pass@$k$), creating a fundamental quality--exploration dilemma. In this paper, we provide a unified explanation of this dilemma. We show that low-confidence remasking improves a myopic proxy for quality while provably constraining the entropy of the induced sequence distribution. To overcome this limitation, we characterize the optimal distribution that explicitly balances quality and exploration, and develop a simple Independent Metropolis--Hastings sampler that approximately targets this distribution during decoding. Experiments across a range of reasoning benchmarks including MATH500, AIME24/25, HumanEval, and MBPP show that our approach yields better exploration-quality tradeoff than both random and low-confidence remasking.
Related papers
- Revisiting Greedy Decoding for Visual Question Answering: A Calibration Perspective [16.787456677570127]
Greedy sampling strategies are widely adopted in large language models to balance output coherence and diversity.<n>We show that greedy decoding can be an efficient yet strong default for Visual Questioning (VQA)<n>We propose Reasoning Models, which outperforms both sampling and standard decoding in multimodal reasoning scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-25T21:01:05Z) - Improving Sampling for Masked Diffusion Models via Information Gain [9.059619122219502]
Masked Diffusion Models (MDMs) offer greater flexibility in decoding order than autoregressive models.<n> Existing samplers typically adopt greedys, prioritizing positions with the highest local certainty to decode at each step.<n>We propose the Info-Gain Sampler, a principled decoding framework that balances immediate uncertainty with information gain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-20T12:26:03Z) - Self-Rewarding Sequential Monte Carlo for Masked Diffusion Language Models [58.946955321428845]
This work presents self-rewarding sequential Monte Carlo (SMC)<n>Our algorithm stems from the observation that most existing MDLMs rely on a confidence-based sampling strategy.<n>We introduce the trajectory-level confidence as a self-rewarding signal for assigning particle importance weights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T09:21:45Z) - Learning Unmasking Policies for Diffusion Language Models [33.44995119635116]
Language Models (dLLMs) now match the downstream performance of their autoregressive counterparts on many tasks.<n>One particularly successful variant is masked discrete diffusion, in which a buffer filled with special mask tokens is progressively replaced with tokens sampled from the model's vocabulary.<n>In this work, we propose to train sampling procedures using reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-09T20:44:33Z) - Sample Smart, Not Hard: Correctness-First Decoding for Better Reasoning in LLMs [72.82403830490084]
We argue that the decoding rule should be calibrated by correctness, not confidence alone.<n>We propose simple strategies that achieve this goal: Greedy-Threshold makes sampling greedy at very low confidence steps.<n>Together, our findings challenge prevailings about decoding under uncertainty and show gains across math and general reasoning benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T14:46:12Z) - Not all tokens are created equal: Perplexity Attention Weighted Networks for AI generated text detection [49.15148871877941]
Next-token distribution outputs offer a theoretically appealing approach for detection of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose the Perplexity Attention Weighted Network (PAWN), which uses the last hidden states of the LLM and positions to weight the sum of a series of features based on metrics from the next-token distribution across the sequence length.<n>PAWN shows competitive and even better performance in-distribution than the strongest baselines with a fraction of their trainable parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-07T17:00:49Z) - Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode.
We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z) - Language Model Cascades: Token-level uncertainty and beyond [65.38515344964647]
Recent advances in language models (LMs) have led to significant improvements in quality on complex NLP tasks.
Cascading offers a simple strategy to achieve more favorable cost-quality tradeoffs.
We show that incorporating token-level uncertainty through learned post-hoc deferral rules can significantly outperform simple aggregation strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T21:02:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.