Agentic Tool Use in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00835v1
• Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 12:46:51 GMT
• Title: Agentic Tool Use in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: This paper organizes the literature into three paradigms: prompting as plug-and-play, supervised tool learning and reward-driven tool policy learning.<n>It aims to address this fragmentation and provide a more structured evolutionary view of agentic tool use.
• Score: 33.63702247846896
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models are increasingly being deployed as autonomous agents yet their real world effectiveness depends on reliable tools for information retrieval, computation and external action. Existing studies remain fragmented across tasks, tool types, and training settings, lacking a unified view of how tool-use methods differ and evolve. This paper organizes the literature into three paradigms: prompting as plug-and-play, supervised tool learning and reward-driven tool policy learning, analyzes their methods, strengths and failure modes, reviews the evaluation landscape and highlights key challenges, aiming to address this fragmentation and provide a more structured evolutionary view of agentic tool use.

Related papers

• The Tool Illusion: Rethinking Tool Use in Web Agents [60.49303190288166]
  We revisit tool use in web agents through an extensive and carefully controlled study.<n>Our findings both revise some prior conclusions and complement others with broader evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T21:18:26Z)
• AdaReasoner: Dynamic Tool Orchestration for Iterative Visual Reasoning [66.24374176797075]
  We introduce textbfAdaReasoner, a family of multimodal models that learn tool use as a general reasoning skill rather than as tool-specific or explicitly supervised behavior.<n>AdaReasoner is enabled by (i) a scalable data curation pipeline exposing models to long-horizon, multi-step tool interactions; (ii) Tool-GRPO, a reinforcement learning algorithm that prioritizes tool selection and sequencing based on end-task success; and (iii) an adaptive learning mechanism that dynamically regulates tool usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T16:04:43Z)
• Improving Large Language Models Function Calling and Interpretability via Guided-Structured Templates [56.73907811047611]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning and tool-use capabilities.<n>LLMs often fail in real-world tool-interactions due to incorrect parameterization, poor tool selection, or misinterpretation of user intent.<n>We introduce a curriculum-inspired framework that leverages structured reasoning templates to guide LLMs through more deliberate step-by-step instructions for generating function callings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T17:55:14Z)
• Tool Graph Retriever: Exploring Dependency Graph-based Tool Retrieval for Large Language Models [43.50789219459378]
  We propose Tool Graph Retriever (TGR), which exploits the dependencies among tools to learn better tool representations for retrieval.<n>First, we construct a dataset termed TDI300K to train a discriminator for identifying tool dependencies.<n>Then, we represent all candidate tools as a tool dependency graph and use graph convolution to integrate the dependencies into their representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T08:36:26Z)
• CRITICTOOL: Evaluating Self-Critique Capabilities of Large Language Models in Tool-Calling Error Scenarios [30.20881816731553]
  The ability of large language models to utilize external tools has enabled them to tackle an increasingly diverse range of tasks.<n>As the tasks become more complex and long-horizon, the intricate tool utilization process may trigger various unexpected errors.<n>How to effectively handle such errors, including identifying, diagnosing, and recovering from them, has emerged as a key research direction for advancing tool learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T17:59:18Z)
• From Exploration to Mastery: Enabling LLMs to Master Tools via Self-Driven Interactions [60.733557487886635]
  This paper focuses on bridging the comprehension gap between Large Language Models and external tools.<n>We propose a novel framework, DRAFT, aimed at Dynamically Refining tool documentation.<n>This methodology pivots on an innovative trial-and-error approach, consisting of three distinct learning phases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:58:44Z)
• Enhancing Tool Retrieval with Iterative Feedback from Large Language Models [9.588592185027455]
  Large language models (LLMs) can effectively handle a certain amount of tools through in-context learning or fine-tuning. In real-world scenarios, the number of tools is typically extensive and irregularly updated, emphasizing the necessity for a dedicated tool retrieval component. We propose to enhance tool retrieval with iterative feedback from the large language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T11:12:01Z)
• What Are Tools Anyway? A Survey from the Language Model Perspective [67.18843218893416]
  Language models (LMs) are powerful yet mostly for text generation tasks. We provide a unified definition of tools as external programs used by LMs. We empirically study the efficiency of various tooling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:20:07Z)
• Making Language Models Better Tool Learners with Execution Feedback [36.30542737293863]
  Tools serve as pivotal interfaces that enable humans to understand and reshape the environment. Existing tool learning methodologies induce large language models to utilize tools indiscriminately. We propose Tool leaRning wIth exeCution fEedback (TRICE), a two-stage end-to-end framework that enables the model to continually learn through feedback derived from tool execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T14:37:05Z)
• Tool Learning with Foundation Models [158.8640687353623]
  With the advent of foundation models, AI systems have the potential to be equally adept in tool use as humans. Despite its immense potential, there is still a lack of a comprehensive understanding of key challenges, opportunities, and future endeavors in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T15:16:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.