Policy Improvement Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00860v1
• Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:10:20 GMT
• Title: Policy Improvement Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a central post-training paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>Existing methods share a common blind spot: they optimize policies based on instantaneous group-level or batch-level statistics without ever verifying whether the resulting update actually improved the model.<n>We argue that the missing ingredient is policy improvement feedback: the ability to measure and optimize inter-iteration progress directly.
• Score: 40.05196753615896
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a central post-training paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models. Yet existing methods share a common blind spot: they optimize policies based on instantaneous group-level or batch-level statistics without ever verifying whether the resulting update actually improved the model. This open-loop design -- updating in isolation at each step, guided only by within-group (batch) reward signals -- means optimization can drift or collapse with no mechanism to detect and correct these failures. We argue that the missing ingredient is policy improvement feedback: the ability to measure and optimize inter-iteration progress directly. To this end, we introduce Policy Improvement Reinforcement Learning (PIRL), a framework that replaces surrogate reward maximization with the explicit objective of maximizing cumulative policy improvement across iterations, and prove this temporal objective is perfectly aligned with maximizing final task performance. Building on PIRL, we propose Policy Improvement Policy Optimization (PIPO), which implements closed-loop optimization through retrospective verification. At each iteration, PIPO evaluates whether the previous update yielded genuine improvement against a sliding-window historical baseline, then actively reinforces beneficial updates and suppresses the harmful ones -- transforming an open-loop process into a self-correcting one. We provide theoretical analysis showing that PIPO performs ascent on the PIRL objective in expectation, and experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate improved stability and performance over GRPO and its variants.

Related papers

• One-Way Policy Optimization for Self-Evolving LLMs [63.8638342097375]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a promising paradigm for scaling reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose One-Way Policy Optimization (OWPO), a method based on the principle of decoupling optimization direction from update magnitude.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that OWPO outperforms strong baselines, including DAPO, OPD, and MOPD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T08:25:27Z)
• Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning [72.25890308541334]
  Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) serves as the de facto standard algorithm for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose Divergence Proximal Policy Optimization (DPPO), which substitutes clipping with a more principled constraint.<n>DPPO achieves superior training and efficiency compared to existing methods, offering a more robust foundation for RL-based fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T18:59:04Z)
• GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization [133.27496265096445]
  We show how to apply Group Relative Policy Optimization under multi-reward setting without examining its suitability.<n>We then introduce Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (GDPO), a new policy optimization method to resolve these issues.<n>GDPO consistently outperforms GRPO, demonstrating its effectiveness and generalizability for multi-reward reinforcement learning optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T18:59:24Z)
• Anchoring Values in Temporal and Group Dimensions for Flow Matching Model Alignment [61.80228667422234]
  VGPO redefines value estimation across both temporal and group dimensions.<n>It transforms the sparse terminal reward into dense, process-aware value estimates.<n>It replaces standard group normalization with a novel process enhanced by absolute values to maintain a stable optimization signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-13T16:31:26Z)
• FAPO: Flawed-Aware Policy Optimization for Efficient and Reliable Reasoning [42.18368547352248]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a promising paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose Flawed-Aware Policy Optimization (FAPO), which presents a parameter-free reward penalty for flawed-positive rollouts.<n>Experiments show that FAPO is effective in broad domains, improving outcome correctness, process reliability, and training stability without increasing the token budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T05:49:38Z)
• GRPO-Guard: Mitigating Implicit Over-Optimization in Flow Matching via Regulated Clipping [63.33669214116784]
  GRPO-Guard is a simple yet effective enhancement to existing GRPO frameworks.<n>It restores a balanced and step-consistent importance ratio, ensuring that PPO clipping properly constrains harmful updates.<n>It substantially mitigates implicit over-optimization without relying on heavy KL regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-25T14:51:17Z)
• Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Policies for Vision-Language-Action Models [7.316631310935769]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have shown strong generalization by leveraging large-scale demonstrations.<n>We propose Flow Policy Optimization (FPO) algorithm, which reformulates importance sampling by leveraging per-sample changes in the conditional flow-matching objective.<n>We evaluate FPO on the LIBERO benchmark and the ALOHA simulation task against supervised, preference-aligned, diffusion-based, autoregressive online RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T03:11:18Z)
• GTPO: Trajectory-Based Policy Optimization in Large Language Models [42.60363805227946]
  Policy-based optimizations are widely adopted today for the training and alignment of language models.<n>In this paper, we reveal and analyze two major limitations of GRPO.<n>We introduce GTPO, which identifies conflict tokens, tokens appearing in the same position across completions with opposite rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T08:15:01Z)
• Overcoming Reward Overoptimization via Adversarial Policy Optimization with Lightweight Uncertainty Estimation [46.61909578101735]
  Adversarial Policy Optimization (AdvPO) is a novel solution to the pervasive issue of reward over-optimization in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback. In this paper, we introduce a lightweight way to quantify uncertainties in rewards, relying solely on the last layer embeddings of the reward model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T09:20:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.